Blowing Up Darwin

[abu afak]

..Belief in Darwin is no different than belief in any other religion.
All are based on faith.

Go forth and sin no more.

Lying/sinning Bimb0!
Evolution belief is based on 160 years of ever-growing and overwhelming EVIDENCE.
God/S have none. Just faith/belief without evidence.
`

 

[Woodznutz]

There is no reason to accept claims such as “every living creature was designed”. why would the gods design life on the planet and then destroy it 65 million years ago?

“Do Over” to get rid of the faulty “design”.?

Well, T-Rex did have those stubby little arms.

 

[Hollie]

Does that include marriage before having children?

Inherited traits.

 

[Hollie]

He was just moving on with his plan.

How do you know that?

 

[Woodznutz]

How do you know that?

Seems logical as he didn't recreate them.

 

[Woodznutz]

Inherited traits.

?

 

[Hollie]

Well, T-Rex did have those stubby little arms.

Poor planning on the part of the gods. T-Rex would have had a feast on Adam’s spare ribs.

 

[Hollie]

Seems logical as he didn't recreate them.

Why would the gods recreate such a poor design?

 

[Woodznutz]

Poor planning on the part of the gods. T-Rex would have had a feast on the Adam’s spare ribs.

I believe it might have had something to do with the angel's use of their arms and hands.

 

[Woodznutz]

Why would the gods recreate such a poor design?

He could have improved the design but didn't.

 

[Hollie]

I believe it might have had something to do with the angel's use of their arms.

Do angels have short stubby arms?

 

[Hollie]

He could have improved the design but didn't

The gods told you that?

 

[Woodznutz]

Do angels have short stubby arms?

Short stubby angels probably do.

 

[Woodznutz]

The gods told you that?

I trust the evidence. Why didn't evolution come to the rescue? It seems to have gone in a different direction as well.

 

[Hollie]

I trust the evidence.

What evidence?

 

[Woodznutz]

What evidence?

The fact that the dino's didn't reappear.

 

[Kruska]

Are you more in danger from GOD or from humans?

Obviously you haven't read any of my post - or you simply lack any ability to comprehend statements.

There is no danger from a God to me - because only religious folks buy into that. - therefore they got all reasons to be afraid of the mass murderer.

 

[Kruska]

I trust the evidence. Why didn't evolution come to the rescue? It seems to have gone in a different direction as well.

Evolution factually came to the rescue - e.g. today's birds are the result. And e.g. crocodiles and sharks got smaller.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Make the case for your supernatural gods creating anything.

Nature cannot explain the presence of nature. Laws cannot explain the presence of laws. So if we cannot use nature, laws, naturalism then we must seek a non-natural explanation, aka a supernatural explanation.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Yes you did:
...scientific revolution started, by people who believed they were studying creation, almost every one of them was a Christian in some way.

e.g. neither Galileo, nor Copernicus were studying creation - but the movement of stars - as such they concluded rightfully that not as the Church propagated that the Sun is moving around the earth (aka the earth is the center of the universe) - but the exact opposite - therefore getting "entangled" with religious fanatics and suppressors.

Galileo was not an atheist, he believed an intelligence designed the universe. His struggle with the Catholic authorities was not a struggle about God but a struggle about how those authorities interpreted the Bible.

Why should a person like Volt, be questioned in regards to his findings?? simply due to having been a Christian - silly question.

Exactly, a belief in God has no bearing on one's ability to do science and frankly was an enabler.

What does e.g. Charles Warren and his archeological findings have to do with studying creation? he simply looked for the place and the date in regards to it's founding age have been set by various archeologists and scientists since then at 10,000 B.C., therefore automatically nullifying the Bibles claim of Adam and Eve having been the first humans, being created around 6300 B.C. etc. etc. - again silly question.

The point being made is that holding a belief in God was not a hindrance to doing science, there's no conflict.