Bloomberg destroyed in dem debate !

[Toddsterpatriot]

[
The problem with that is the rich run the show, so they get the goodies. You can be against it, but that’s meaningless. Condemning those who think the government should help more than just rich as communists, is stupid.

Gubmint shouldn't be "helping" (i.e. subsidizing) ANYBODY!....And as an alleged "libertarian/anarchist" you should both know that and represent that mindset.

Methinks you've been bunking with the Golfing Gomer.

View attachment 307764

except. . . we are living in a distorted reality.

I get what Gipper is saying. He is talking about RealPolitik here. We can talk philosophically, or we can talk where the rubber meets the road.

The entire system is tilted toward the elites.

Why is it all right for us to have socialism for the folks that are running the government and the corporations, but the hungry masses? FUCK THEM, let them just struggle to survive. With out a strong middle class? We are all doomed. An international technocratic police state WILL be the end result.

The fact is, the international monetary system, and the Federal Reserve, guaranteeing profits, but socializing the risk, IS socialism for the rich. IT distorts the entire conversation.

With out recognizing the one ton gorilla in the room? No honest conversation can be had.

Federal Reserve Program Is Socialism for the Rich - Shadowproof

‘Socialism for the rich’: the evils of bad economics

Socialism for the Rich, Capitalism for the Poor: An Interview With Noam Chomsky

The American Way: Socialism for the Rich, Free Enterprise for the Rest

Socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor - Wikipedia

Lemon socialism - Wikipedia




Now, if we END THE FED, put strict limits on corporate and citizen lobbying, and pass a public funding of campaigns Amendment? Hell, I think we could all be on the same page.

The first link is funny!!!

Druckenmiller hit the nail on the head. QE and any program that relies on the wealth effect is, in truth, a redistribution of wealth from the lower classes to the rich because the rich are the ones who own the assets that are being inflated.

If Apple stock goes up, that doesn't take from the poor.


The consequences of the spending however are borne by the lower classes who not only by definition don’t own many assets but are forced to deal with higher food and fuel prices resulting inflation can cause while also getting zero return on their savings. QE is socialism for the rich and even the 1% are admitting it. Game. Set. Match.

If inflation was an issue, interest on savings would be higher, not lower.
Who'd this clown learn economics from, AOC? DURR

 

[MisterBeale]

[
The problem with that is the rich run the show, so they get the goodies. You can be against it, but that’s meaningless. Condemning those who think the government should help more than just rich as communists, is stupid.

Gubmint shouldn't be "helping" (i.e. subsidizing) ANYBODY!....And as an alleged "libertarian/anarchist" you should both know that and represent that mindset.

Methinks you've been bunking with the Golfing Gomer.

View attachment 307764

except. . . we are living in a distorted reality.

I get what Gipper is saying. He is talking about RealPolitik here. We can talk philosophically, or we can talk where the rubber meets the road.

The entire system is tilted toward the elites.

Why is it all right for us to have socialism for the folks that are running the government and the corporations, but the hungry masses? FUCK THEM, let them just struggle to survive. With out a strong middle class? We are all doomed. An international technocratic police state WILL be the end result.

The fact is, the international monetary system, and the Federal Reserve, guaranteeing profits, but socializing the risk, IS socialism for the rich. IT distorts the entire conversation.

With out recognizing the one ton gorilla in the room? No honest conversation can be had.

Federal Reserve Program Is Socialism for the Rich - Shadowproof

‘Socialism for the rich’: the evils of bad economics

Socialism for the Rich, Capitalism for the Poor: An Interview With Noam Chomsky

The American Way: Socialism for the Rich, Free Enterprise for the Rest

Socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor - Wikipedia

Lemon socialism - Wikipedia




Now, if we END THE FED, put strict limits on corporate and citizen lobbying, and pass a public funding of campaigns Amendment? Hell, I think we could all be on the same page.

I understand the argument just fine....But arguing for equality and shades of grey in servitude to The State is a piss poor way to go about moving the cause of freedom and individuality forward.

Sorry but the game’s over. We lost. Accept it.

 

[MisterBeale]

[
The problem with that is the rich run the show, so they get the goodies. You can be against it, but that’s meaningless. Condemning those who think the government should help more than just rich as communists, is stupid.

Gubmint shouldn't be "helping" (i.e. subsidizing) ANYBODY!....And as an alleged "libertarian/anarchist" you should both know that and represent that mindset.

Methinks you've been bunking with the Golfing Gomer.

View attachment 307764

except. . . we are living in a distorted reality.

I get what Gipper is saying. He is talking about RealPolitik here. We can talk philosophically, or we can talk where the rubber meets the road.

The entire system is tilted toward the elites.

Why is it all right for us to have socialism for the folks that are running the government and the corporations, but the hungry masses? FUCK THEM, let them just struggle to survive. With out a strong middle class? We are all doomed. An international technocratic police state WILL be the end result.

The fact is, the international monetary system, and the Federal Reserve, guaranteeing profits, but socializing the risk, IS socialism for the rich. IT distorts the entire conversation.

With out recognizing the one ton gorilla in the room? No honest conversation can be had.

Federal Reserve Program Is Socialism for the Rich - Shadowproof

‘Socialism for the rich’: the evils of bad economics

Socialism for the Rich, Capitalism for the Poor: An Interview With Noam Chomsky

The American Way: Socialism for the Rich, Free Enterprise for the Rest

Socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor - Wikipedia

Lemon socialism - Wikipedia




Now, if we END THE FED, put strict limits on corporate and citizen lobbying, and pass a public funding of campaigns Amendment? Hell, I think we could all be on the same page.

The first link is funny!!!

Druckenmiller hit the nail on the head. QE and any program that relies on the wealth effect is, in truth, a redistribution of wealth from the lower classes to the rich because the rich are the ones who own the assets that are being inflated.

If Apple stock goes up, that doesn't take from the poor.


The consequences of the spending however are borne by the lower classes who not only by definition don’t own many assets but are forced to deal with higher food and fuel prices resulting inflation can cause while also getting zero return on their savings. QE is socialism for the rich and even the 1% are admitting it. Game. Set. Match.

If inflation was an issue, interest on savings would be higher, not lower.
Who'd this clown learn economics from, AOC? DURR

If the FED destroys the purchasing power of the currency to inflate the value of assets, it is the poor, fixed income, working classes are the ones who suffer so corporate, retiree and investor classes can benefit.

If the price of Apple goes up b/c of the action of the FED? Yeah, the poor do have the bread taken out of their mouths, they can afford less next time they go grocery shopping. When I started raising my kid, a box of Mac-n-Cheese was a quarter. Now? It is about 80 cents.

I hope you are getting a good price on your stocks and bonds.

The FED is also the one who sets interest rates.

Who the hell do you think you are fooling?

There is a reason the lying ass pols don't figure in energy and food into the CPI.


. . . I just noticed something. Toddster? Bankster?

Damn. . . you don't even try to hide your shilling, do ya?

 

[Obiwan]

View attachment 307695

Nope. What I remember was that a Muslim group wanted to buy an abandoned building in New York and the racists all had a fit.

Then you might want to sober up, where you can remember shit...
Analysis: NYC Mayor Bloomberg emerges as eloquent advocate for ground zero mosque

 

[yidnar]

First of all you are a proven liar

Yeah? WHERE? WHEN, assfuck?

so you expecting me to believe you didn't vote for McCain or Romney is hysterical.

No you drooling JACKASS. Like I originally said, YOU SAID you'd give me $1,000 if I voted for Romney and McCain and I AGREED I HAD! I had no choice. It was either that or pick Obama! SO PAY UP you stupid deadbeat!

Secondly you are such a dick even if I did owe you the only payment you would get is the middle finger.

WELCHER. Might expect as much from a guy who bent over backwards to say to the disagreement of the rest of the world that Bloomberg WASN'T a racist. Eat shit and die.

And finally I find it amusing that you are carring on a conversation from 3 or 4 days ago all by yourself.

Yes, talking to a tulip bulb like you IS like talking to the wall.

Gramps: WRONG on Bloomberg.

Gramps: Welcher of bets.

Admit it, you're another closet liberal like Mac. You'll sleep better once you admit the truth for once.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

ELIZABETH WARREN SCALPS BILLIONAIRE WHO CALLS WOMEN FAT BROADS.

Bloomberg skinned alive.

Mother Goose

Elizardbeth Warpaint, the Nanny Granny, was bobbing her beak so much at Bloombox that I thought she would waddle over and peck him to death.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

[
The problem with that is the rich run the show, so they get the goodies. You can be against it, but that’s meaningless. Condemning those who think the government should help more than just rich as communists, is stupid.

Gubmint shouldn't be "helping" (i.e. subsidizing) ANYBODY!....And as an alleged "libertarian/anarchist" you should both know that and represent that mindset.

Methinks you've been bunking with the Golfing Gomer.

View attachment 307764

except. . . we are living in a distorted reality.

I get what Gipper is saying. He is talking about RealPolitik here. We can talk philosophically, or we can talk where the rubber meets the road.

The entire system is tilted toward the elites.

Why is it all right for us to have socialism for the folks that are running the government and the corporations, but the hungry masses? FUCK THEM, let them just struggle to survive. With out a strong middle class? We are all doomed. An international technocratic police state WILL be the end result.

The fact is, the international monetary system, and the Federal Reserve, guaranteeing profits, but socializing the risk, IS socialism for the rich. IT distorts the entire conversation.

With out recognizing the one ton gorilla in the room? No honest conversation can be had.

Federal Reserve Program Is Socialism for the Rich - Shadowproof

‘Socialism for the rich’: the evils of bad economics

Socialism for the Rich, Capitalism for the Poor: An Interview With Noam Chomsky

The American Way: Socialism for the Rich, Free Enterprise for the Rest

Socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor - Wikipedia

Lemon socialism - Wikipedia




Now, if we END THE FED, put strict limits on corporate and citizen lobbying, and pass a public funding of campaigns Amendment? Hell, I think we could all be on the same page.

The first link is funny!!!

Druckenmiller hit the nail on the head. QE and any program that relies on the wealth effect is, in truth, a redistribution of wealth from the lower classes to the rich because the rich are the ones who own the assets that are being inflated.

If Apple stock goes up, that doesn't take from the poor.


The consequences of the spending however are borne by the lower classes who not only by definition don’t own many assets but are forced to deal with higher food and fuel prices resulting inflation can cause while also getting zero return on their savings. QE is socialism for the rich and even the 1% are admitting it. Game. Set. Match.

If inflation was an issue, interest on savings would be higher, not lower.
Who'd this clown learn economics from, AOC? DURR

If the FED destroys the purchasing power of the currency to inflate the value of assets, it is the poor, fixed income, working classes are the ones who suffer so corporate, retiree and investor classes can benefit.

If the price of Apple goes up b/c of the action of the FED? Yeah, the poor do have the bread taken out of their mouths, they can afford less next time they go grocery shopping. When I started raising my kid, a box of Mac-n-Cheese was a quarter. Now? It is about 80 cents.

I hope you are getting a good price on your stocks and bonds.

The FED is also the one who sets interest rates.

Who the hell do you think you are fooling?

There is a reason the lying ass pols don't figure in energy and food into the CPI.


. . . I just noticed something. Toddster? Bankster?

Damn. . . you don't even try to hide your shilling, do ya?

If the FED destroys the purchasing power of the currency to inflate the value of assets,

Inflation was lower between 2010-2019 than 2000-2009 .
Inflation was lower between 2000-2009 than 1990-1999 .
Inflation was lower between 1990-1999 than 1980-1989 .

If the price of Apple goes up b/c of the action of the FED?

Or for any other reason, according to the comedian who wrote that "article".

I hope you are getting a good price on your stocks and bonds.​

Kicking ass.​

​

The FED is also the one who sets interest rates.​

They set the overnight rate, they don't set the rate on your credit card or the rate on my mortgage.​

​

Who the hell do you think you are fooling?​

Can't fool an idiot like you, everything you know is wrong.
​

There is a reason the lying ass pols don't figure in energy and food into the CPI.​

Don't know the difference between inflation and core inflation......because you're ignorant.

Why Core Inflation is Important

Consumer Price Index Frequently Asked Questions : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics​

 

[MisterBeale]

[
The problem with that is the rich run the show, so they get the goodies. You can be against it, but that’s meaningless. Condemning those who think the government should help more than just rich as communists, is stupid.

Gubmint shouldn't be "helping" (i.e. subsidizing) ANYBODY!....And as an alleged "libertarian/anarchist" you should both know that and represent that mindset.

Methinks you've been bunking with the Golfing Gomer.

View attachment 307764

except. . . we are living in a distorted reality.

I get what Gipper is saying. He is talking about RealPolitik here. We can talk philosophically, or we can talk where the rubber meets the road.

The entire system is tilted toward the elites.

Why is it all right for us to have socialism for the folks that are running the government and the corporations, but the hungry masses? FUCK THEM, let them just struggle to survive. With out a strong middle class? We are all doomed. An international technocratic police state WILL be the end result.

The fact is, the international monetary system, and the Federal Reserve, guaranteeing profits, but socializing the risk, IS socialism for the rich. IT distorts the entire conversation.

With out recognizing the one ton gorilla in the room? No honest conversation can be had.

Federal Reserve Program Is Socialism for the Rich - Shadowproof

‘Socialism for the rich’: the evils of bad economics

Socialism for the Rich, Capitalism for the Poor: An Interview With Noam Chomsky

The American Way: Socialism for the Rich, Free Enterprise for the Rest

Socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor - Wikipedia

Lemon socialism - Wikipedia




Now, if we END THE FED, put strict limits on corporate and citizen lobbying, and pass a public funding of campaigns Amendment? Hell, I think we could all be on the same page.

The first link is funny!!!

Druckenmiller hit the nail on the head. QE and any program that relies on the wealth effect is, in truth, a redistribution of wealth from the lower classes to the rich because the rich are the ones who own the assets that are being inflated.

If Apple stock goes up, that doesn't take from the poor.


The consequences of the spending however are borne by the lower classes who not only by definition don’t own many assets but are forced to deal with higher food and fuel prices resulting inflation can cause while also getting zero return on their savings. QE is socialism for the rich and even the 1% are admitting it. Game. Set. Match.

If inflation was an issue, interest on savings would be higher, not lower.
Who'd this clown learn economics from, AOC? DURR

If the FED destroys the purchasing power of the currency to inflate the value of assets, it is the poor, fixed income, working classes are the ones who suffer so corporate, retiree and investor classes can benefit.

If the price of Apple goes up b/c of the action of the FED? Yeah, the poor do have the bread taken out of their mouths, they can afford less next time they go grocery shopping. When I started raising my kid, a box of Mac-n-Cheese was a quarter. Now? It is about 80 cents.

I hope you are getting a good price on your stocks and bonds.

The FED is also the one who sets interest rates.

Who the hell do you think you are fooling?

There is a reason the lying ass pols don't figure in energy and food into the CPI.


. . . I just noticed something. Toddster? Bankster?

Damn. . . you don't even try to hide your shilling, do ya?

If the FED destroys the purchasing power of the currency to inflate the value of assets,

Inflation was lower between 2010-2019 than 2000-2009 .
Inflation was lower between 2000-2009 than 1990-1999 .
Inflation was lower between 1990-1999 than 1980-1989 .

If the price of Apple goes up b/c of the action of the FED?

Or for any other reason, according to the comedian who wrote that "article".

I hope you are getting a good price on your stocks and bonds.

Kicking ass.
The FED is also the one who sets interest rates.

They set the overnight rate, they don't set the rate on your credit card or the rate on my mortgage.
Who the hell do you think you are fooling?

Can't fool an idiot like you, everything you know is wrong.

There is a reason the lying ass pols don't figure in energy and food into the CPI.

Don't know the difference between inflation and core inflation......because you're ignorant.

View attachment 307869

Why Core Inflation is Important

View attachment 307868


Consumer Price Index Frequently Asked Questions : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics​

O.K. You are right.

I must be imagining the fact that my money is buying less.

You are a fool. Trying to convince me and the forum that the purchasing power of the dollar is not going down? Sell your bullshit somewhere else.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Gubmint shouldn't be "helping" (i.e. subsidizing) ANYBODY!....And as an alleged "libertarian/anarchist" you should both know that and represent that mindset.

Methinks you've been bunking with the Golfing Gomer.

View attachment 307764

except. . . we are living in a distorted reality.

I get what Gipper is saying. He is talking about RealPolitik here. We can talk philosophically, or we can talk where the rubber meets the road.

The entire system is tilted toward the elites.

Why is it all right for us to have socialism for the folks that are running the government and the corporations, but the hungry masses? FUCK THEM, let them just struggle to survive. With out a strong middle class? We are all doomed. An international technocratic police state WILL be the end result.

The fact is, the international monetary system, and the Federal Reserve, guaranteeing profits, but socializing the risk, IS socialism for the rich. IT distorts the entire conversation.

With out recognizing the one ton gorilla in the room? No honest conversation can be had.

Federal Reserve Program Is Socialism for the Rich - Shadowproof

‘Socialism for the rich’: the evils of bad economics

Socialism for the Rich, Capitalism for the Poor: An Interview With Noam Chomsky

The American Way: Socialism for the Rich, Free Enterprise for the Rest

Socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor - Wikipedia

Lemon socialism - Wikipedia




Now, if we END THE FED, put strict limits on corporate and citizen lobbying, and pass a public funding of campaigns Amendment? Hell, I think we could all be on the same page.

The first link is funny!!!

Druckenmiller hit the nail on the head. QE and any program that relies on the wealth effect is, in truth, a redistribution of wealth from the lower classes to the rich because the rich are the ones who own the assets that are being inflated.

If Apple stock goes up, that doesn't take from the poor.


The consequences of the spending however are borne by the lower classes who not only by definition don’t own many assets but are forced to deal with higher food and fuel prices resulting inflation can cause while also getting zero return on their savings. QE is socialism for the rich and even the 1% are admitting it. Game. Set. Match.

If inflation was an issue, interest on savings would be higher, not lower.
Who'd this clown learn economics from, AOC? DURR

If the FED destroys the purchasing power of the currency to inflate the value of assets, it is the poor, fixed income, working classes are the ones who suffer so corporate, retiree and investor classes can benefit.

If the price of Apple goes up b/c of the action of the FED? Yeah, the poor do have the bread taken out of their mouths, they can afford less next time they go grocery shopping. When I started raising my kid, a box of Mac-n-Cheese was a quarter. Now? It is about 80 cents.

I hope you are getting a good price on your stocks and bonds.

The FED is also the one who sets interest rates.

Who the hell do you think you are fooling?

There is a reason the lying ass pols don't figure in energy and food into the CPI.


. . . I just noticed something. Toddster? Bankster?

Damn. . . you don't even try to hide your shilling, do ya?

If the FED destroys the purchasing power of the currency to inflate the value of assets,

Inflation was lower between 2010-2019 than 2000-2009 .
Inflation was lower between 2000-2009 than 1990-1999 .
Inflation was lower between 1990-1999 than 1980-1989 .

If the price of Apple goes up b/c of the action of the FED?

Or for any other reason, according to the comedian who wrote that "article".

I hope you are getting a good price on your stocks and bonds.

Kicking ass.
The FED is also the one who sets interest rates.

They set the overnight rate, they don't set the rate on your credit card or the rate on my mortgage.
Who the hell do you think you are fooling?

Can't fool an idiot like you, everything you know is wrong.

There is a reason the lying ass pols don't figure in energy and food into the CPI.

Don't know the difference between inflation and core inflation......because you're ignorant.

View attachment 307869

Why Core Inflation is Important

View attachment 307868


Consumer Price Index Frequently Asked Questions : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics​

O.K. You are right.

I must be imagining the fact that my money is buying less.

You are a fool. Trying to convince me and the forum that the purchasing power of the dollar is not going down? Sell your bullshit somewhere else.

I must be imagining the fact that my money is buying less.

Look at how much less the dollar bought under the gold standard.
Holy shit!!! Looks like 50% less in about 6 years. Weird.

Trying to convince me and the forum that the purchasing power of the dollar is not going down?

What makes you think that when I point out your ignorance, I'm claiming there is no inflation?

 

[toobfreak]

In all the watching of the Democratic Debate last night, I was taken back by the fact that neither there during the debate nor here that I’ve seen, no one has asked or asked the candidates the

THREE OBVIOUS QUESTIONS that begged to be asked!

Over and over, most of the candidates stated that their strongest most urgent goal and the greatest reason to vote for them was to get Trump out of office! MUST REMOVE TRUMP! Yet no on asked these begging questions:

1). The economy is soaring! Employment is sky high! Wages are up! Fairer Trade is being addressed. Borders are safer. Crime is down. Several top terrorist leaders have been eliminated. The military has been modernized. Veteran care is improved. ISIS all but destroyed. North Korea has been visited and stabilized. Drug prices have been reduced. Construction jobs way up. America now largest oil producer. Russia was sanctioned. New space defense policy created. New USMCA trade agreement replaces NAFTA. War prisoners brought home. School Choice educational grants. And $500 billion in errors found at HUD plus much, MUCH more. And all this accomplished under incredible obstruction, resistance. hostility and distraction. So just what has Trump done or not done that makes it so urgently important to replace him?​

2). Liz Warren stated that healthcare is in a crisis! How is that? How can that be when we were told that the ACA Act / Obamacare was going to fix so very much? I mean, it was supposedly in a crisis BEFORE Obamacare! So it really didn’t fix anything after all?​

3). Bloomberg stated that “What Trump did to healthcare is a disgrace.” What was that? I didn’t know that Trump had done anything to healthcare! He was stopped by McCain and Congress! All I’ve heard for three years is that Trump has FAILED to address healthcare. Now he’s wrecked it?​

Why is it that these questions are never asked nor answered? I mean, these people just spent two hours on stage telling us how VITAL it was that Trump must go!!!

 

[toobfreak]

Oh, the other question I keep wondering about:
In 2016, when Trump was running, he gave interviews to everyone. Every network, every paper, no matter their leanings. Answered every question.

SO WHY IS IT THAT these Democrats only interview with Stephen Colbert, Oprah, The View, CNN and MSNBC? Why are they so afraid to interview with Mark Levin or Tucker Carson or debate on Fox News where the hosts aren't leading them with soft questions?

 

[Zorro!]

ELIZABETH WARREN SCALPS BILLIONAIRE WHO CALLS WOMEN FAT BROADS.

Bloomberg skinned alive.

Mother Goose

Elizardbeth Warpaint, the Nanny Granny, was bobbing her beak so much at Bloombox that I thought she would waddle over and peck him to death.

She does have the "Granny on Crack" thing down.

 

[Zorro!]

 

[a loss for words]

In the Bloomberg organization, there is a sycophant who is looking for a job. The one who said if trump can do this so can you.
I think there is someone who said Bloomberg would be great comedy. And he was.
Warren got off a great riff. I think Bloomberg will quietly disappear. It only cost him a boatload of money. That will be great for the rest of them. Who had someone they could pile on.
That was great

 

[The Republicans]

Bloomberg is the elite and the little people are stupid and they need guidance to life. If you are a democrat and support Bloomberg. Here’s a question for you. Did your parents drop you as a kid? Honestly, Bernie is a socialist but he has some decency to respect the people. Bloomberg is the type would release the wrath and he doesn’t care if you have civil rights. He is scared of me and you. So what he do, violate civil rights by checking you. Anyone who is a attorney would argue that Bloomberg is going to be more like North Korea

 

[JoeB131]

BLOOMERS got depantsed by the Democrats last night, period!

To many people think that was NOT planned. It was, and probably by the DNC.

Huh you say, why would they do that, it makes no sense!

OH yes it does! The last question tells you everything you need know, along with the polls.

The DNC does NOT want DOOMBERG versus BERNARD the rest of the way out. Were that to happen, it would mean that one of them mathematically would win the nomination on the 1st ballot. What if it was BERNARD? The DNC would then HAVE to take him.

Quite the contrary, A lot of people in the DNC want Bloomberg because they know Biden is a flop and Buttigeig is too gay. Tuesday was a setback for Mike.

No one wants a contested convention. Those are just clusterfucks.

It would look a lot worse if Commie Bernie goes into a convention leading in delegates and comes out with someone else being picked by the Superdelegates.

 

[JoeB131]

Another idiotic rock throwing attempt.
It wasn't just an abandoned building somewhere in NY.

Uh, yeah, actually it was. No one was in the building at the time.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

and destroyed is a kind way to described how he fared in his 1st debate appearance ! in the end his oponents effectively painted an insensitive racist,sexist asshole ... normally this would be the end of any candidate ...but not every candidate has nearly 60 billion to buy the dnc and the election.

Got destroyed or destroyed himself ?

Sounds like he is a bigger moron than we originally thought.

 

[JoeB131]

"It took exactly one question at Wednesday’s Democratic presidential debate for Michael Bloomberg’s opponents to lay into him. Bernie Sanders slammed Bloomberg for his “stop-and-frisk” policy while he was New York's mayor, which the senator described as “outrageous” and a way to guarantee low turnout from black and Hispanic voters. Elizabeth Warren called Bloomberg “a billionaire who calls women fat broads and horse-faced lesbians.” Joe Biden slammed him for “throwing close to 5 million young black men up against the wall.”

There were five million minorities that got thrown up against the wall? Or there were just a few hundred thousand who got thrown up against a wall multiple times because they were malingering? The funny thing is, no one really complained about Stop and Frisk at the time. They were happy that the police were being proactive and crime was going down.

A lot of working people know the kind of woman who files a "sexual harassment suit" after she gets fired is the same one who was kind of a drag on the team when she worked there.

The other Democrats are falling all over themselves to appease the base, while ignoring middle America. That's how they got McGovern in 1972, and he lost 49 states to Tricky Dick.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Bloomberg is Einstein compared to trump. trump could not have survived that debate.

If you can call it a debate.

It sounded more like the table at the local McDonald's when the breakfast farts show up.