Blocking evidence: Clinton campaign tries to keep memos from Durham's upcoming trial

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2016
15,711
27,669
2,430

Blocking evidence:

Clinton campaign tries to keep memos from Durham's upcoming trial

Clinton campaign and its top two former officials, John Podesta and Robby Mook, argue evidence about its Russia dirt digging on Trump should be protected by attorney-client privilege.
20 Apr 2022 ~~ By John Solomon

Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and its former top officials are intervening in Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation, seeking to block the release of memos about its Russia research on Donald Trump on grounds that it is covered by attorney-client privilege.
The requests were filed late Tuesday by the campaign, its former chairman John Podesta, its former campaign manager Robby Mook and its former law firm Perkins Coie, coming about a month before the start of former campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann’s trial on a charge of lying to the FBI.
“Hillary for America respectfully moves this honorable court to intervene as an interested non party to assert privilege claims over documents and information that the government seeks to compel,” the campaign wrote in its motion.
The motion is designed to block evidence of the campaign's work with former MI6 agent Christopher Steele and the firm Fusion GPS to dig up dirt on Trump alleging Russia collusion, some of which was later shared with the FBI and CIS by Sussmann.


Commentary:
Attorney-Client PRIVILEGE is exactly that, a privilege, not a right.
If it involves illegalities of either or both parties the privilege is revoked.
Progressive Maoist/DSA Democrat Leftist keep telling us we must have total transparency, so that there will not be even the appearance of impropriety. Yet, the attempt to stop the truth of transparency to proceed. While as usual,
the Clintons have other rules and standards. I’m shocked, just shocked.
It seems no matter how well Bleach Bit and the destruction of State Dept. documents were there is still damning exculpatory information available to destroy the Clinton crime family. Criminal conduct negates attorney client privilege
 
Clinton obstructing Justice? :04:


1650509275878.png
 
She learned from Trump to never give in to demands.


Indeed, "What difference does it make."


Here's your answer
 

Blocking evidence:

Clinton campaign tries to keep memos from Durham's upcoming trial

Clinton campaign and its top two former officials, John Podesta and Robby Mook, argue evidence about its Russia dirt digging on Trump should be protected by attorney-client privilege.
20 Apr 2022 ~~ By John Solomon

Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and its former top officials are intervening in Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation, seeking to block the release of memos about its Russia research on Donald Trump on grounds that it is covered by attorney-client privilege.
The requests were filed late Tuesday by the campaign, its former chairman John Podesta, its former campaign manager Robby Mook and its former law firm Perkins Coie, coming about a month before the start of former campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann’s trial on a charge of lying to the FBI.
“Hillary for America respectfully moves this honorable court to intervene as an interested non party to assert privilege claims over documents and information that the government seeks to compel,” the campaign wrote in its motion.
The motion is designed to block evidence of the campaign's work with former MI6 agent Christopher Steele and the firm Fusion GPS to dig up dirt on Trump alleging Russia collusion, some of which was later shared with the FBI and CIS by Sussmann.


Commentary:
Attorney-Client PRIVILEGE is exactly that, a privilege, not a right.
If it involves illegalities of either or both parties the privilege is revoked.
Progressive Maoist/DSA Democrat Leftist keep telling us we must have total transparency, so that there will not be even the appearance of impropriety. Yet, the attempt to stop the truth of transparency to proceed. While as usual,
the Clintons have other rules and standards. I’m shocked, just shocked.
It seems no matter how well Bleach Bit and the destruction of State Dept. documents were there is still damning exculpatory information available to destroy the Clinton crime family. Criminal conduct negates attorney client privilege


That shit goes out the window when the law firm in question is a coconspirator.

.
 
The trial is supposed to start May 24th I believe. If it does, this is going to be a real sh** show for the Left. In one, fell, swoop, it will throw the narratives out for 1/2 the Leftists across the country. How many and whom are going to serve jail time is not the point, although that would be excellent if it happened. What is most important is--------->that the Lefts whole narrative be debunked, along with showing the DNC knowingly pulled this off under their leader at the time, Hillary.

It is going to be a very large political present to the GOP come November, and a very large present to the Trump family also.
 
If the lawyers for the Campaign asked or told Sussman to go to the FBI and lie about it, and were stupid enough to leave a paper trail to their collusion, then let a judge decide if it was criminal or not. If it was then it should be allowed as evidence.
 
If the lawyers for the Campaign asked or told Sussman to go to the FBI and lie about it, and were stupid enough to leave a paper trail to their collusion, then let a judge decide if it was criminal or not. If it was then it should be allowed as evidence.
~~~~~~
  • Clinton compares Trump's lawsuit to a 'press release' and 'list of political grievances' in a Wednesday court filing
  • She's one of a dozen people the ex-president named in a lawsuit last month
  • He accused Clinton, Jim Comey, the DNC and others of an 'unthinkable plot' to 'weave a false narrative' that he was colluding with a hostile foreign power
  • In her filing, Clinton's lawyers called Trump's lawsuit 'fact-free pleading'

Running Scared Hillary? Afraid they may find out that you did collude to damage his campaign. Hillary uses a lot of angry adjectives without reference to any particular item. Especially with the information coming from Durham, she has got to be getting worried. She's skated on things for decades, but just maybe she'll finally pay for what she has done.
The 'Steel Dossier', Alpha Bank and Russian collusion were not only 'fundraising tools, a press release or a list of political grievances' needed to be investigated by federal law enforcement and should not be dismissed with prejudice.'
No matter how much evidence she and her co-conspirators have destroyed, there is still more than enough evidence people like Sussman, Elias and others still possess that will bury her.
 
~~~~~~
  • Clinton compares Trump's lawsuit to a 'press release' and 'list of political grievances' in a Wednesday court filing
  • She's one of a dozen people the ex-president named in a lawsuit last month
  • He accused Clinton, Jim Comey, the DNC and others of an 'unthinkable plot' to 'weave a false narrative' that he was colluding with a hostile foreign power
  • In her filing, Clinton's lawyers called Trump's lawsuit 'fact-free pleading'

Running Scared Hillary? Afraid they may find out that you did collude to damage his campaign. Hillary uses a lot of angry adjectives without reference to any particular item. Especially with the information coming from Durham, she has got to be getting worried. She's skated on things for decades, but just maybe she'll finally pay for what she has done.
The 'Steel Dossier', Alpha Bank and Russian collusion were not only 'fundraising tools, a press release or a list of political grievances' needed to be investigated by federal law enforcement and should not be dismissed with prejudice.'
No matter how much evidence she and her co-conspirators have destroyed, there is still more than enough evidence people like Sussman, Elias and others still possess that will bury her.

Nice pole vault.
 

Durham Wins First Part of the Fight to Obtain “Privileged” Fusion GPS Documents in Huge Blow to Clinton Campaign

5 May 2022 ~~ By Cristina Laila

Special Prosecutor John Durham secured a victory against Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign.
As previously reported by Techno Fog, as part of the prosecution of former Clinton Campaign/DNC lawyer Michael Sussmann: Special Counsel Durham is seeking the following e-mails/communications that have been either redacted or hidden from his review:
  1. Documents involving Fusion GPS’s provision of opposition research and media-related strategies to Hillary for America, the DNC, and Perkins Coie. This includes the Fusion GPS/Perkins Coie contract and 38 e-mails and attachments between and among Fusion GPS, Rodney Joffe, and Perkins Coie.
  2. Communications between Fusion GPS and Rodney Joffe relating to the Alfa Bank allegations, and “other emails that precede, and appear to relate to, those communications.” This includes emails between Joffe and Laura Seago, whom Durham has subpoenaed as a trial witness.
The Clinton Campaign (including Robby Mook and John Podesta), Fusion GPS, Perkins Coie, Rodney Joffe, and the DNC are fighting to keep these e-mails and records secret, reasoning Fusion’s “role was to provide consulting services in support of the legal advice attorneys at Perkins Coie were providing to” the Clinton Campaign.
~Snip~
John Durham won the first round in the fight to obtain the “privileged” Fusion GPS documents.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top