Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Humm...I can name righteous Jews, and righteous Christians, But I can't really name any righteous muslims of the top of my head?
1. Sorry old bud, but what is tefilin?
The Torah tells us "And you shall bind them as a sign on your arm, and they shall be as frontlets on your head between your eyes" (Deuteronomy 6:8).
This is the Mitzvah of Tefillin which is the binding of ones heart and soul to G-d. However, how the Torah is interpreted into the book of laws is not more than inspired thinking. So, the laying of the tefillin is only the cultural representation of the traditionally interpreted Tefillin expression in the Torah.
There's a lot of wiggle room in the term "bind them as a sign on your arm, and they shall be as frontlets on your head, between your eyes."
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9NJtJJoVIY[/ame]
That's what I mean by interpretations are at issue, not the belief. I know, you don't see that, but maybe someday. I know you understand my words, just not their connections.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbvkwiFg3Yw[/ame]
2. We haven't gotten into the G-d questions, we are still asking is there *Satan*?
^Slow down, read up^
4. So you killed Muslims because it was kill or be killed?
5. I think thats okay my friend.
6. I just told you, seeing you were protecting your Nation, its justified, relax, theres killing, then theres murder, Muslims just murder, they do it to thier own, and any body who gets in the way, and feel nothing about it, inhuman, at least you are human, and have feelings of guilt, but this guilt is misplaced, forgetabloutit!:
It's not you who will be judging my actions.I personally fought Egyptians. Calling them Muslims indicts all other Muslims into an attachment with this fight.
I won't go there. It's not real to me. It's a lie of words.
I know what the Jews believe.I'm not impressed with the cut and paste, No one man opinion's is the right one, No interpretations of the ancient text are set in stone, They are only opinions.
I know what the Jews believe.I'm not impressed with the cut and paste, No one man opinion's is the right one, No interpretations of the ancient text are set in stone, They are only opinions.
I studied with them for 2 years at a synagogue.
What I posted is very accurate.
Prove me wrong.![]()
I know what the Jews believe.I'm not impressed with the cut and paste, No one man opinion's is the right one, No interpretations of the ancient text are set in stone, They are only opinions.
I studied with them for 2 years at a synagogue.
What I posted is very accurate.
Prove me wrong.![]()
I know what the Jews believe.
I studied with them for 2 years at a synagogue.
What I posted is very accurate.
Prove me wrong.![]()
OK then, tell me what is wrong with the post concerning the Jewish view of Satan?A FULL EXPLANATION?
Who's explaining Sunni Man? And what is an explanation?
An interpretation????
Then you might need to research Jroc. The loudest voices are often the most frightening and quell the more moderate voices.
OK then, tell me what is wrong with the post concerning the Jewish view of Satan?A FULL EXPLANATION?
Who's explaining Sunni Man? And what is an explanation?
An interpretation????
That's simply extreme. To look at the books, one must needs look at the times in which the books were birthed.
When I look to the ancient Hebrew Torah and use pilpul to study Talmud with many other who are more learned than I, there is a marked difference in the approach of ancient Judaism then and how it is practiced today.
The difference, as I said, is interpretive. I know you will not accept this, so I will just agree to disagree with you.
OK then, tell me what is wrong with the post concerning the Jewish view of Satan?A FULL EXPLANATION?
Who's explaining Sunni Man? And what is an explanation?
An interpretation????
“The Role of Righteous Muslim Persons,”I know there is such thing as moderate muslims I just said I couldn’t name any RIGHTOUS muslims off the top of my head, which says something about that religion
That's simply extreme. To look at the books, one must needs look at the times in which the books were birthed.
When I look to the ancient Hebrew Torah and use pilpul to study Talmud with many other who are more learned than I, there is a marked difference in the approach of ancient Judaism then and how it is practiced today.
The difference, as I said, is interpretive. I know you will not accept this, so I will just agree to disagree with you.
Ropey,
You are correct in that I will OBVIOUSLY disagree with you.
Could be because you are STILL missing my point.
I get the impression that we are in the apple/orange stage.
I am talking about apples.....you responding by talking about oranges.
I agree with you that when we talk about statements by people, when interpreting what they say you must consider the context, and obviously the "times" when that made some things culturally acceptable and others not....example a hottie wearing a bikini.....where here it's not only whether this is in the 50's or today.....but location as well (i.e. Saudi Arabia vs Fort Lauterdale).
But, this should occur when we "INTERPRET" the statement and pronounce judgment on the whole statement !
Example: PSYCHO MOHAMMED stated: "KILL THE MISHRAKUN"
That's a DOCUMENTED FACT. You may "INTERPRET" the statement from all perspectives: Context, Age, Place, etc....BUT YOU CANNOT CHANGE or "MISINTERPRET" THE ACTUAL WORDS INVOLVED in the sentence by Psycho Mohammed.
You can "INTERPRET" Mohammed's statement by saying "that's par for the course". That was a "good" or "bad" thing. Or, it is a "good" or "bad" thing in that period of History..........BUT YOU CANNOT DO ANY "INTERPRETATION" of the fact that Psycho Mohammed actually said the words: "KILL THE MISHRAKUN !!!"
THE WORDS IN "KILLTHE MISHRAKUN" are INVIOLATE..... THE WORDS CANNOT BE CHANGED IN THE PROCESS OF "INTERPRETATION".
And, that my confused friend is what I am stating in my post:
I state the INVIOLATE WORDS of Mohammed, or the people in the HADITH that have given the FINALLY APPROVED ISLAMIC VERSION that has the same INVIOLABILITY as the KORAN'S WORDS........and then......ONLY THEN...... I make my judgment......
And, in most cases I don't even have to "INTERPRET" or make my judgment.
The very words and actions of the PSYCHO Mohammed are so fucking REPULSIVE that NO INTERPRETATION IS NECESSARY.
When I repeatedly state that the PSYCHO Mohammed is a Historically Documented MASS MURDERER, THIEF, PEDOPHILIC RAPIST........Each one of these epithets IS A DOCUMENTED FACT USING THE INVIOLATE WORDS OF THE KORAN and/or THE HADITH !!!
Yes, my conclusion is an "INTERPRETATION". However, if in the Koran or Hadith, the Psycho Mohammed is stated as saying that he actually robbed caravans.....and those words are INVIOLATE then my "INTERPRETATION" of the TRUTH of the subject should be, by all that's sacred in LOGIC, that Psycho Mohammed was a THIEF.
I get the distinct impression that you are confused and doing some "double-talk" to cover up your confusion.
1. Okay man, I wasn't getting the answers I was asking for anyways.
2. Stay thirsty my friend.
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
Good and Evil
But the tree was knowledge. Nowhere did I say that evil was fictional. You do not read to understand.
My last post to you and advice.
Use your knowledge to make your choices.
If your choices are to vomit hate, then go ahead.
There are more than a few others here on all sides of the divides that will support it.
I won't. Even if you put the platform that ISLAM = Devil that must be fought.
I simply disagree with your interpretation.
Keep yours. I keep mine.