Blackburn demands investigation into Justice Jackson over Grammy appearance applauding anti-ICE rhetoric

Why wouldn’t Jackson define what a woman is when asked?
You know why. She was thinking ahead to a possible case where a man claims he’s now a woman and wants to compete in a major tournament on the women’s team, or a case where a man/woman wants to share a dorm room with a woman, or whatever, and she doesn’t want to be locked into a definition, such as XX chromosomes or born with female genitalia. Already shows she will be biased in favor of the transgender and against the normal women.
 
The Constitution gives Congress the power to regulate federal elections. The Voting Rights Act is constitutional and the Supreme Court eviscerating it is legislating from the bench.
Hahahahahahaha.......who decided it was constitutional?
 
Well, being on the SCOTUS doesn't reduce her citizen status and she can attend anything she wants. It isn't as if she has any real experience in judicial integrity. She's just a diversity hire.
So if say she attended an ICE riot and threw smoke bombs...then the following month had to rule on ICE laws...what would that mean? :P
 
Yea, just keep it lily white.

Oh, that's right my bad, he does have one token black at HUD.
A number of Hispanics and South Pacific Islander

Far more representative of the diverse nation then Joey Xiden who just put up idiots they are embarrassments and can’t define what a woman is
 
You should have a citizenship verified ID to vote. That should be pretty basic
Nah, not needed, since there is no significant, in person fraud anywhere. It's not worth even one voter not being able to vote because the proper ID is not with them.

And, in the bigger picture, not ONE more concession should be made to the Republicans about any election, anywhere, until they publicly apologize as a party for the spreading of lies about the 2020 election and go on record that the 2020 election was free and fair and secure.

Not one.
 
Nah, not needed, since there is no significant, in person fraud anywhere. It's not worth even one voter not being able to vote because the proper ID is not with them.

And, in the bigger picture, not ONE more concession should be made to the Republicans about any election, anywhere, until they publicly apologize as a party for the spreading of lies about the 2020 election and go on record that the 2020 election was free and fair and secure.

Not one.

Nobody is going to be apologezing to the demafasict terrorist
 
Nah, not needed, since there is no significant, in person fraud anywhere. It's not worth even one voter not being able to vote because the proper ID is not with them.

And, in the bigger picture, not ONE more concession should be made to the Republicans about any election, anywhere, until they publicly apologize as a party for the spreading of lies about the 2020 election and go on record that the 2020 election was free and fair and secure.

Not one.
You are very worried that the ballots collected by the FBI in Georgia expose fraud.
 
Nah, not needed, since there is no significant, in person fraud anywhere.

That we know of. Like I said, they need to start looking into people who were accidentally registered to vote via auto registration methods who are considered legal voters and nobody is looking for them.


It's not worth even one voter not being able to vote because the proper ID is not with them.

Remember how you all said “paying taxes should be the price to live in a civilized country?” Well, “proof of citizenship should be the price for people to vote in a civilized country”


And, in the bigger picture, not ONE more concession should be made to the Republicans about any election, anywhere, until they publicly apologize as a party for the spreading of lies about the 2020 election and go on record that the 2020 election was free and fair and secure.

Not one.

Only we are seeing that there were issues with some of the states.

Despite you not wanting to admit it, 315,000 votes not being verified is a big deal.
 
OMFG! Are you serious?

Have you read her legal opinions? They not only lack any Constitutional merit, but they also read right out of a Critical Marx playbook.

She is in contention for the absolute worst SC Justice in the entire history of the United States.

Barrett is a good Justice except she wants to be liked and so her rulings can be a little left field.


Even the other 2 liberals on the court are embarrassed by Jackson. We may see Kagan voting against the other two more often.
 
15th post
A number of Hispanics and South Pacific Islander

Far more representative of the diverse nation then Joey Xiden who just put up idiots they are embarrassments and can’t define what a woman is
1770518009795.webp


1770518128119.webp
 
Even the other 2 liberals on the court are embarrassed by Jackson. We may see Kagan voting against the other two more often.
What Jackson’s appointment to the SCOTUS tells us is the same lesson we got from Kamala’s appointment as VP: that when you prioritize female blackness over merit and competence, you end up with black women in high positions.
 
Back
Top Bottom