Black Voter Support For Trump Nearly Doubles To 36%: Rasmussen

[buckeye45_73]

Gallup has been a joke since 2010.

Rasmussen has never been credible

They are literally right more than 80% of the time in increasingly unpredictable elections.

Turn off the CNN for 5 minutes and get some oxygen for your brain.

Immediately before an election, Rasmussen will release polls that are not such outliers

Prior to that....they give whatever numbers Republicans need

OMG you are projecting again, that's what you lefties do. ALL the time.....Hillary is up by a million....then you get closer at election day......it's why we laugh at you 40% approval ratings....it's all bullshit

Hard to find an approval for Trump above 40 percent no matter how many times you try

These approval polls are non sense.....it's propaganda....they always show the democrats high, republicans low....and we know that's not always the case......

 

[Pogo]

Meanwhile in the real world, latest poll (YouGov) sez of black voters:

Strongly approve ---------- 3%
Somewhat approve ----- 10%
Somewhat disapprove -- 8%
Strongly disapprove ---- 64%

Meanwhile, in the real world, we just got an anarcho-communist to join the #walkaway campaign.

You are even losing ******* Antifa now.

I have no idea what that even means. My Stormfront translator app is down.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Meanwhile in the real world, latest poll (YouGov) sez of black voters:

Strongly approve ---------- 3%
Somewhat approve ----- 10%
Somewhat disapprove -- 8%
Strongly disapprove ---- 64%

Meanwhile, in the real world, we just got an anarcho-communist to join the #walkaway campaign.

You are even losing ******* Antifa now.

I have no idea what that even means. My Stormfront translator app is down.

So is ours......tell Richard Spencer in your socialist language we don't like him.
Now, he was saying that members of ANTIFA are waking up and leaving your side.....your side promotes all the shit you talk about...

in fact, I bet your happy what going on in South Africa

 

[rightwinger]

Polling firms that have interviewed far more African Americans, and that are much more transparent than Rasmussen, all show that Trump’s black approval rating is much lower than 36 percent.

For example, Gallup has interviewed thousands of African American respondents in 2018. Its polling suggests that Trump’s black approval rating has consistently been around 10 to 15 percent through 2018.

Gallup has been a joke since 2010.

Rasmussen has never been credible

yeah, that's why they are lauded as one of the most accurate polls every election.

Actually they are hit or miss

But they did predict HIllary winning the election

And not just win.....they had her at 90%+ and could never find a way Trump could hit 270. It was embarrassing for them and the media......they need to get out of New York and DC.

They under sampled Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and it cost them.

I never understood why pollsters use a nationwide sample. It is irrelevant in evaluating the Electoral College.

They should sample the hell out of the dozen or so swing states and ignore the rest of the country

 

[Pogo]

Meanwhile in the real world, latest poll (YouGov) sez of black voters:

Strongly approve ---------- 3%
Somewhat approve ----- 10%
Somewhat disapprove -- 8%
Strongly disapprove ---- 64%

Meanwhile, in the real world, we just got an anarcho-communist to join the #walkaway campaign.

You are even losing ******* Antifa now.

I have no idea what that even means. My Stormfront translator app is down.

So is ours......tell Richard Spencer in your socialist language we don't like him.
Now, he was saying that members of ANTIFA are waking up and leaving your side.....your side promotes all the shit you talk about...

in fact, I bet your happy what going on in South Africa

Umm yyyeah unfortunately I don't have a "side". My vinyl records have "sides"; I don't.

And by the way whattaya mean "ours" and "we", paleface? Are you in some auditorium somewhere? Posting by committee?

Nor do I talk about 'shit', although I do point it out when it's in the way. Kind of a public service.

Nor, just to keep this crazy train rollin', do I live in South Africa. Never been there. Same with Antifa and Richard Spencer, who I'm pretty sure are on opposite "sides". So whatever Proud 2B White is babbling about is a mystery. I simply posted a poll result. That's it.

 

[Hossfly]

Is there like an email chain or a Facebook group where you guys get this stuff? You are like the 4th person to post this.

Does the GOP send you your talking points?

It's all over the net.
Sorry if you only watch trusted sources that practice censorship.

I turned on CNN a while ago and they were going crazy over Brennan's comedown. Switched to MSNBC and it was about Brennan too. Those 2 networks are worse than a dog with a bone.

They needed something to keep everyone off of their demands for the identities of the Manafort jury. They were about to totally lose control of the story. So they focused on this jerk (Brennan) instead.

Why would they need to keep everyone off of a normal request that is made at most high profile cases, a request that even the judge stated he understood the need for and would normally grant it.

Whatever your "trusted" sources are, you need some new ones, you are one of the most ill-informed people on this forum

When have you ever seen a published list of a jury? I've never seen one.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Is there like an email chain or a Facebook group where you guys get this stuff? You are like the 4th person to post this.

Does the GOP send you your talking points?

It's all over the net.
Sorry if you only watch trusted sources that practice censorship.

I turned on CNN a while ago and they were going crazy over Brennan's comedown. Switched to MSNBC and it was about Brennan too. Those 2 networks are worse than a dog with a bone.

They needed something to keep everyone off of their demands for the identities of the Manafort jury. They were about to totally lose control of the story. So they focused on this jerk (Brennan) instead.

Why would they need to keep everyone off of a normal request that is made at most high profile cases, a request that even the judge stated he understood the need for and would normally grant it.

Whatever your "trusted" sources are, you need some new ones, you are one of the most ill-informed people on this forum

When have you ever seen a published list of a jury? I've never seen one.

Please provide the evidence that any of the organizations that requested the data was going to publish it?

They are not getting it to publish it, but to contact them after the trial for stories.

**** you people are stupid


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Slyhunter]

It's all over the net.
Sorry if you only watch trusted sources that practice censorship.

I turned on CNN a while ago and they were going crazy over Brennan's comedown. Switched to MSNBC and it was about Brennan too. Those 2 networks are worse than a dog with a bone.

They needed something to keep everyone off of their demands for the identities of the Manafort jury. They were about to totally lose control of the story. So they focused on this jerk (Brennan) instead.

Why would they need to keep everyone off of a normal request that is made at most high profile cases, a request that even the judge stated he understood the need for and would normally grant it.

Whatever your "trusted" sources are, you need some new ones, you are one of the most ill-informed people on this forum

When have you ever seen a published list of a jury? I've never seen one.

Please provide the evidence that any of the organizations that requested the data was going to publish it?

They are not getting it to publish it, but to contact them after the trial for stories.

**** you people are stupid


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Your stupid if you believe that.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I turned on CNN a while ago and they were going crazy over Brennan's comedown. Switched to MSNBC and it was about Brennan too. Those 2 networks are worse than a dog with a bone.

They needed something to keep everyone off of their demands for the identities of the Manafort jury. They were about to totally lose control of the story. So they focused on this jerk (Brennan) instead.

Why would they need to keep everyone off of a normal request that is made at most high profile cases, a request that even the judge stated he understood the need for and would normally grant it.

Whatever your "trusted" sources are, you need some new ones, you are one of the most ill-informed people on this forum

When have you ever seen a published list of a jury? I've never seen one.

Please provide the evidence that any of the organizations that requested the data was going to publish it?

They are not getting it to publish it, but to contact them after the trial for stories.

**** you people are stupid


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Your stupid if you believe that.

It is always why they ask for them. As was pointed out above you have never seen the names published but they have gotten them in the past.

Put your tinfoil hat back on.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[buckeye45_73]

Gallup has been a joke since 2010.

Rasmussen has never been credible

yeah, that's why they are lauded as one of the most accurate polls every election.

Actually they are hit or miss

But they did predict HIllary winning the election

And not just win.....they had her at 90%+ and could never find a way Trump could hit 270. It was embarrassing for them and the media......they need to get out of New York and DC.

They under sampled Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and it cost them.

I never understood why pollsters use a nationwide sample. It is irrelevant in evaluating the Electoral College.

They should sample the hell out of the dozen or so swing states and ignore the rest of the country

Yeah, I think state polls would be better, but I think they are not sampling the correct people in general.

 

[mudwhistle]

It's all over the net.
Sorry if you only watch trusted sources that practice censorship.

I turned on CNN a while ago and they were going crazy over Brennan's comedown. Switched to MSNBC and it was about Brennan too. Those 2 networks are worse than a dog with a bone.

They needed something to keep everyone off of their demands for the identities of the Manafort jury. They were about to totally lose control of the story. So they focused on this jerk (Brennan) instead.

Why would they need to keep everyone off of a normal request that is made at most high profile cases, a request that even the judge stated he understood the need for and would normally grant it.

Whatever your "trusted" sources are, you need some new ones, you are one of the most ill-informed people on this forum

When have you ever seen a published list of a jury? I've never seen one.

Please provide the evidence that any of the organizations that requested the data was going to publish it?

They are not getting it to publish it, but to contact them after the trial for stories.

**** you people are stupid


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

**** u people are gullible.

 

[Hossfly]

It's all over the net.
Sorry if you only watch trusted sources that practice censorship.

I turned on CNN a while ago and they were going crazy over Brennan's comedown. Switched to MSNBC and it was about Brennan too. Those 2 networks are worse than a dog with a bone.

They needed something to keep everyone off of their demands for the identities of the Manafort jury. They were about to totally lose control of the story. So they focused on this jerk (Brennan) instead.

Why would they need to keep everyone off of a normal request that is made at most high profile cases, a request that even the judge stated he understood the need for and would normally grant it.

Whatever your "trusted" sources are, you need some new ones, you are one of the most ill-informed people on this forum

When have you ever seen a published list of a jury? I've never seen one.

Please provide the evidence that any of the organizations that requested the data was going to publish it?

They are not getting it to publish it, but to contact them after the trial for stories.

**** you people are stupid


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I asked you a question and as usual, deflected and projected. When does anyone get a list of jurors? And what about a list of people on a grand jury? Are you a jurist?

 

[rightwinger]

Rasmussen has never been credible

yeah, that's why they are lauded as one of the most accurate polls every election.

Actually they are hit or miss

But they did predict HIllary winning the election

And not just win.....they had her at 90%+ and could never find a way Trump could hit 270. It was embarrassing for them and the media......they need to get out of New York and DC.

They under sampled Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and it cost them.

I never understood why pollsters use a nationwide sample. It is irrelevant in evaluating the Electoral College.

They should sample the hell out of the dozen or so swing states and ignore the rest of the country

Yeah, I think state polls would be better, but I think they are not sampling the correct people in general.

Statistically, I think they do the best they can. Random is still random

But why sample anyone in California, NY, Texas, Alabama?
Might as well ring those states up as blue or red beforehand

Florida, Ohio, Virginia, N Carolina and now Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin need to be sampled to death........They will decide the 2020 election

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What do other polls say?

For some reason I wonder why you guys always post Rasmussen polls

Other polling shows that Trump has no path to the White House. Go with that

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Wow if that keeps trending, Democrats might have to pretend harder to care about Blacks.

....or let Illegals vote everywhere

 

[buckeye45_73]

yeah, that's why they are lauded as one of the most accurate polls every election.

Actually they are hit or miss

But they did predict HIllary winning the election

And not just win.....they had her at 90%+ and could never find a way Trump could hit 270. It was embarrassing for them and the media......they need to get out of New York and DC.

They under sampled Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and it cost them.

I never understood why pollsters use a nationwide sample. It is irrelevant in evaluating the Electoral College.

They should sample the hell out of the dozen or so swing states and ignore the rest of the country

Yeah, I think state polls would be better, but I think they are not sampling the correct people in general.

Statistically, I think they do the best they can. Random is still random

But why sample anyone in California, NY, Texas, Alabama?
Might as well ring those states up as blue or red beforehand

Florida, Ohio, Virginia, N Carolina and now Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin need to be sampled to death........They will decide the 2020 election

Well I think you might learn trends and such, but yeah I would focus more on battle grounds. And I'm not sure how to classify, it seems like Trump got a lot of people who didn't vote previously.....so not sure how you catch those.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I turned on CNN a while ago and they were going crazy over Brennan's comedown. Switched to MSNBC and it was about Brennan too. Those 2 networks are worse than a dog with a bone.

They needed something to keep everyone off of their demands for the identities of the Manafort jury. They were about to totally lose control of the story. So they focused on this jerk (Brennan) instead.

Why would they need to keep everyone off of a normal request that is made at most high profile cases, a request that even the judge stated he understood the need for and would normally grant it.

Whatever your "trusted" sources are, you need some new ones, you are one of the most ill-informed people on this forum

When have you ever seen a published list of a jury? I've never seen one.

Please provide the evidence that any of the organizations that requested the data was going to publish it?

They are not getting it to publish it, but to contact them after the trial for stories.

**** you people are stupid


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I asked you a question and as usual, deflected and projected. When does anyone get a list of jurors? And what about a list of people on a grand jury? Are you a jurist?

You question was based upon a lie, thus it was ignored.



Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[rightwinger]

What do other polls say?

For some reason I wonder why you guys always post Rasmussen polls

Other polling shows that Trump has no path to the White House. Go with that

Rasmussen predicted he was going to lose

 

[rightwinger]

Actually they are hit or miss

But they did predict HIllary winning the election

And not just win.....they had her at 90%+ and could never find a way Trump could hit 270. It was embarrassing for them and the media......they need to get out of New York and DC.

They under sampled Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and it cost them.

I never understood why pollsters use a nationwide sample. It is irrelevant in evaluating the Electoral College.

They should sample the hell out of the dozen or so swing states and ignore the rest of the country

Yeah, I think state polls would be better, but I think they are not sampling the correct people in general.

Statistically, I think they do the best they can. Random is still random

But why sample anyone in California, NY, Texas, Alabama?
Might as well ring those states up as blue or red beforehand

Florida, Ohio, Virginia, N Carolina and now Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin need to be sampled to death........They will decide the 2020 election

Well I think you might learn trends and such, but yeah I would focus more on battle grounds. And I'm not sure how to classify, it seems like Trump got a lot of people who didn't vote previously.....so not sure how you catch those.

Could be, but they should be picked up in the polls

I think most polls undersample cell phones and only sample those willing to take polls
I think a lot of the “go fuk yourself” calls were Trump voters

 

[Hossfly]

They needed something to keep everyone off of their demands for the identities of the Manafort jury. They were about to totally lose control of the story. So they focused on this jerk (Brennan) instead.

Why would they need to keep everyone off of a normal request that is made at most high profile cases, a request that even the judge stated he understood the need for and would normally grant it.

Whatever your "trusted" sources are, you need some new ones, you are one of the most ill-informed people on this forum

When have you ever seen a published list of a jury? I've never seen one.

Please provide the evidence that any of the organizations that requested the data was going to publish it?

They are not getting it to publish it, but to contact them after the trial for stories.

**** you people are stupid


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I asked you a question and as usual, deflected and projected. When does anyone get a list of jurors? And what about a list of people on a grand jury? Are you a jurist?

You question was based upon a lie, thus it was ignored.



Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Afraid to answer because you don't know squat?