Black Racism

Your problem is that I am talking about the fact that what you say is disingenuous when you study how whites would arm one tribe in a war against the other so they could buy the captives. Second, whites didn't have to buy the slaves. Finally, I am talking primarily about what whites have done after slavery to this minute. We are way past slavery cracker, so until you demonstrate a real, genuine willingness to confront continuing white racism, you have permission to kiss the moistest part of my ass.

Such a racist little Sambo you are.

And I'm rather certain that, before I could kiss any part of your ass, I'd have to wait for a great big white dick to be removed from it...
 
That's a lie. Another example of white fragility. I am smarter than you are and the black president we had t.urned a deep recession into record economic growth.

And yet he still didn't see as low an unemployment rate amongst negroes as Trump did...
 
Such a racist little Sambo you are.

And I'm rather certain that, before I could kiss any part of your ass, I'd have to wait for a great big white dick to be removed from it...
There is nothing racist about the truth white boy. And your prreference for white dick is noted. I like women personally.
 
What else can be done? Decades of income transfers by government totaling trillions, affirmative action pushing unqualified minorities to the top, and a big educational effort on condemning racism hasn’t resulted in blacks succeeding.
In my opinion the Democratic Party has always been the most racist political party.

Lyndon Johnson secured the black vote which insured the Democratic Party would survive even when it went off the tracks and started to push Marist socialism. Johnson started the old routine of promising the blacks diamonds and roses but delivering zirconium and dandelions. The object never was to lift the blacks out of poverty but just to get their vote while keeping them poor so they wouldn’t morph into republicans.

If the Democratic Party really wanted to elevate blacks it would make damn sure our educational system in the inner cities was world class. Instead the Democratic Party uses our educational system to brainwash students. They may not be able to read or do math but they will vote to keep their plantation masters in office.

1627029008569.jpg
 
In my opinion the Democratic Party has always been the most racist political party.

Lyndon Johnson secured the black vote which insured the Democratic Party would survive even when it went off the tracks and started to push Marist socialism. Johnson started the old routine of promising the blacks diamonds and roses but delivering zirconium and dandelions. The object never was to lift the blacks out of poverty but just to get their vote while keeping them poor so they wouldn’t morph into republicans.

If the Democratic Party really wanted to elevate blacks it would make damn sure our educational system in the inner cities was world class. Instead the Democratic Party uses our educational system to brainwash students. They may not be able to read or do math but they will vote to keep their plantation masters in office.

View attachment 516182
I have to laugh when a white republican starts talking about what blacks need. You are delusional. The school system brainwashes blacks into believing that whites have made it in America because of education, hard work and merit, not because of the exclusion of others from the same opprtynities for the same amount of time.. That's why you republicans are scared of the 1619 Project.
 
I have to laugh when a white republican starts talking about what blacks need. You are delusional. The school system brainwashes blacks into believing that whites have made it in America because of education, hard work and merit, not because of the exclusion of others from the same opprtynities for the same amount of time.. That's why you republicans are scared of the 1619 Project.
If the schools teach whites make it by education, hard work and merit they are right. From what I have seen that’s how many successful blacks make it too.

When in Rome do as the Romans do.
 
It was because of Obama that the low unemployment happened.
Oh, horseshit.

Trump did more for negroes like you than the mulignan ever did. Coloreds like you just aren't smart enough to realize it.

I love how the idiot left attributes everything good that happened while Trump was in office to Obama, and everything bad to Trump. Talk about a pack of racist fucks. Negroes really take the cake...
 
Not completly how it worked but blacks did not make slavery legal in America, nor did Africans implement Jim Crow in America. If whites were so superior they would not have needed slaves. But the truth is that you descend from lazy, shiftless debtors and peons who didn't have jack shit going for them in Europe so they ran away.
LOL 13 states had slavery 15 and the territories did not. The North was a powerhouse in manufactory and ironworks. You couldn't do facts if they pulled your head off and shit down your neck. Further DEMOCRATS in the south did Jim Crow again a few states. And once again ended BY WHITES not blacks.
 
I have to laugh when a white republican starts talking about what blacks need. You are delusional. The school system brainwashes blacks into believing that whites have made it in America because of education, hard work and merit, not because of the exclusion of others from the same opprtynities for the same amount of time.. That's why you republicans are scared of the 1619 Project.
what do you care 60 percent of blacks drop out of school cause they are taught they can not succeed by the democrats,
 
Such a racist little Sambo you are.

And I'm rather certain that, before I could kiss any part of your ass, I'd have to wait for a great big white dick to be removed from it...
White dk ? You're weird dude. You got something to tell us ?
 
White dk ? You're weird dude. You got something to tell us ?
The point is that IM2 wants me to kiss his ass. The problem is that I have no doubt that, even if I wanted to try, IM2 would have a white dick up his ass.

Of course, I'm just guessin'.

Now, since we know you have nothing of consequence to add, fuck off Buckwheat...
 
So, people here have whined to me about why I never show examples of "black racism." So let's discuss this "black racism" that people complain about. And I am not going to come from the simple minded assertion that any consideration of a persons skin color makes a person a racist. Nor am I going to come with the cloddish notion of "if you substitute the word white" this is racist. I refuse to give validity to the two wrongs defense without starting with the first wrong, which I  will be showing and so let's begin.

The argument or claim of black racism comes from a belief in a racial symmetry or egalitarianism that has never existed in this country. Symmetry assumes everything is the same, egalitarianism assumes everybody has had the same experience. Some Whites and some people of color have adopted this false reality.

So let's look at how things began. The that was in the past argument convenently denies the difference in the experiences of blacks and whites which is esential to understanding the disingenuous nature of the black racism claim.

The system in America is built upon a belief in white racial superiority. What made whites believe they were superior therefore entitled to things that others were not? What made the whites from Europe decide they had the right to invade this continent and create a government when governments were already here?

For the answer, it appears that we must take ourselves back to the era of what was called the Age of Enlightenment. Now I do not know just exactly who was enlightened by these ideas, because to people who were not of European descent the era had nothing to do with being “enlightened.” Europeans really were not enlightened either. This era was also called the Age of Reason, but what came out of this age were some of the most unreasoned and crazed ideas in the history of mankind. This era is credited with advancing modern concepts like liberty, constitutional government, as well as the separation of church and state. Such “reason and enlightenment” came equipped with philosophies steeped in racism. As usual, half of the story is not told to promote some great ideal of the superiority of thought and reason based on the European or white model. However, the top thinkers of the time held ideas or beliefs such as this:

“I am apt to suspect the negroes and in general all other species of men (for there are four or five different kinds) to be naturally inferior to the whites. There never was a civilized nation of any other complexion than white, nor even any individual eminent either in action or speculation. No ingenious manufactures amongst them, no arts, no sciences. On the other hand, the most rude and barbarous of the whites, such as the ancient GERMANS, the present TARTARS, have still something eminent about them in their valour, form of government, or some other particular. Such a uniform and constant differences could not happen in so many countries and ages, if nature had not made an original distinction betwixt these breeds of men. Not to mention our colonies, there are Negroe slaves dispersed all over Europe, of which none ever discovered any symptoms of ingenuity, tho' low people, without education, will start up amonst us, and distinguish themselves in every profession. In JAMAICA indeed they talk of one negroe as a man of parts and learning; but 'tis likely he is admired for very slender accomplishments like a parrot, who speaks a few words plainly. “

David Hume, “Of National Characters”

Scientific racism, sometimes termed biological racism, is the pseudoscientific belief that empirical evidence exists to support or justify racism (racial discrimination), racial inferiority, or racial superiority. Historically, scientific racism received credence throughout the scientific community, but it is no longer considered scientific. Dividing humankind into biologically distinct groups is sometimes called racialism, race realism, or race science by its proponents.


Simply put, scientific racism is the use of scientific theories to justify racial superiority or inferiority. It creates a belief in the natural or genetic superiority of a race. Scientific racism as a belief or ideology has been a problem since the 1600s. Such beliefs still exist today among specific segments of the worldwide white community, and it is called racial realism. Scientific racism more bluntly put, is racist B.S.

Immanuel Kant was one of the earliest advocates of scientific racism and was considered the greatest thinker of the times. This is how misguided we have been relative to our educations in this and other western societies. The excuse of “that is how they thought at the time” has been used as a defense for his racism.

In three separate works Kant claimed that the Negro is, in most respects, the lowest of all races. He also referred to blacks as the “bad race” and whites as “the good race,” argued that the white race contains “all incentives and talents,” and felt that whites were the “only ones who always progress toward perfection.”

To my knowledge, Kant never repudiated any of these explicitly racist claims.

- Ryan Very, Kant’s Racism,

Kant's belief that the European white was the only race capable of self-improvement and the highest level of civilization, were widely accepted. These ideas created the belief in European superiority that we still see today couched under a newer descriptive term called western civilization. Kant and Hume were not alone in this belief. 

It is a serious question among them whether they [Africans] are descended from monkeys or whether the monkeys come from them. Our wise men have said that man was created in the image of God. Now here is a lovely image of the Divine Maker: a flat and black nose with little or hardly any intelligence. A time will doubtless come when these animals will know how to cultivate the land well, beautify their houses and gardens, and know the paths of the stars: one needs time for everything.

Voltaire - Les Lettres d'Amabed (1769)

A long line of European thinkers supported this and expanded it. Voltaire is given credit as an advocate for civil liberties, yet Voltaire had a racial hierarchy where blacks were lower than whites and ranked just above oysters. Benjamin Rush, a founding father of this country, believed that being black meant you had a skin disease. He even had a name for it, Negroidism. He believed that people born black had a form of leprosy. In every instance of trying to provide this “scientific” understanding of cultural differences and skin complexion whites always gave themselves top billing as being more advanced.

Scientific racism has been a huge part of the American experience. On March 12, 1851, Dr. Samuel Cartwright read a report he was appointed as a member of a committee to do for the Medical Association of Louisiana titled, “Report On The Diseases And Physical Peculiarities Of The Negro Race”. Dr. Samuel Cartwright was the guy who made up the disease called drapetomania to claim blacks running away from slavery suffered from a mental disorder. Hoss Cartwright could have written a better report. Cartwright claimed Blacks had been running around in Africa with no medical facilities or medical study. I think Imhotep and a few others would disagree with Cartwright regarding his opinion. Cartwright also claimed that the brain size of blacks is a “ninth or tenth less than in other races of men.” He goes on to use the skeletal, vascular, and nervous systems of blacks to claim that blacks are like children and that blacks can only prosper in a situation where they are governed by a controlling force. He claimed that blacks were incapable of self-rule, that blacks gravitate towards slavery and enjoy being under such rule.

This is just a small bit of the things that created a belief in white racial superiority in America. These beliefs manifested itself into a legal, govermental, educational and economic system of white racial preference. This preference was and still today has been enforced and maintained by enacting or enforcing law and policy.

And so what is black racism?

The response to this system by blacks in opposition by calling out whites because of the existence of this system is called black racism. The comeback by primarily far right extremist or racist whites is that because blacks are calling out racists they are claiming an inherent trait in all white people therefore they are racists. But this is not the case.

What many whites call black racism is a conclusion blacks have made by observed behavior and lived experiences based on actions committed by members of the white race. The conclusion is based on things having actual existence and are actual occurrences. It is information presented having objective reality: originating in or based on observation or experience. These conclusions rely on experience or observation alone often without due regard for system and theory. Not only are they capable of being verified or disproved by observation or experiment, they have been verified or disproved by such. These conclusions do not include any claim of inherent traits in every single white person, but it does describe a behavior that has been exhibited among members of the white race. A belief in black inferiority does not meet any of these requirements.

My point here is that blacks did not develop racial classifications and determine that blacks were at the top of the ladder. Blacks did not come to America on the Mayflower either. Blacks did not establish laws in this country that have denied whites of constitutional rights. Blacks have not found ways to subvert laws to continue maintaining a racial advantage every time potential racial advancements were supposed to be made. The old line of two wrongs don’t make a right needs to be dropped from the rhetoric of white people. It is time to recognize the first wrong from whence all others have come.

Sources:

Hume, David, “Of Natural Characters,” Part I Essay XXI of Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary
Ryan Very, Kant’s Racism, Kant's Racism
A'ndrea Elyse Messer, Scientific racism's long history mandates caution, Penn State News, February 14, 2014
Kenan Malik, On The Enlightenment’s ‘Race Problem’, ON THE ENLIGHTENMENT’S ‘RACE PROBLEM’
Bernasconi, R. (2001) ‘Who Invented the Concept of Race? Kant’s Role in the Enlightenment Construction of Race’ in Bernasconi, R. (Ed.) Race, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers
Voltaire, Les Lettres d’Amabed, Volume 21 (p. 462-463)., Les Lettres d’Amabed/Lettre 7b d’Amabed - Wikisource
“Report On The Diseases And Physical Peculiarities Of The Negro Race” The New Orleans Medical And Surgical Journal : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
Thomas Jefferson, “Notes on the State of Virginia”(1785), pg.240, Thomas Jefferson, 1743-1826. Notes on the State of Virginia
I see no significant difference between your hackneyed racial collectivism and that of Hume.
 
What else can be done? Decades of income transfers by government totaling trillions, affirmative action pushing unqualified minorities to the top, and a big educational effort on condemning racism hasn’t resulted in blacks succeeding.

Don't blame northern liberals. Our ancestors didn't import Africans to the colonies or the states. Blame greedy Englishmen from the Southern colonies for the hopeless mess we're in today.
 
Don't blame northern liberals. Our ancestors didn't import Africans to the colonies or the states. Blame greedy Englishmen from the Southern colonies for the hopeless mess we're in today.
Wrong. Slavery existed in all 13 colonies at one time or another. Had the northern states needed large numbers of labors to farm their lands, black slaves would have been imported there just like the south.
 
I see no significant difference between your hackneyed racial collectivism and that of Hume.
That's because you're a white racist looking for a false equivalence.
 

Forum List

Back
Top