I confused you and the original poster. The OP gave the link and there was no mention of going to the hospital for tests. She went to the police a month after the supposed rape. Or it was statuary rape when it was consensual but under age. But read the link for the CORRECT information.
The link in the OP is fake news, jackass. That means it is disinformation. Everybody who is not an idiot knew right away that the headline was way too absurd to be anything but a ridiculous lie. But not you, because you're an idiot.
I gave the CORRECT information, as always.
BTW, he was not accused of raping statues, dumbass.
Raping statues is no statuary rape. Statuary rape is having sex with a minor even if it was consensual.
If the link in the OP was fake, give the accurate link. You are pretty free with the word "idiot" when you talk about raping statues, don't you think?
stat·u·ar·y
/ˈstaCHəˌwerē/
noun
- sculpture consisting of statues; statues regarded collectively.
"classical statuary"
You're an idiot.
You have to have sexual contact before you can call something rape dumbass.
Here are the FACTS
Man sentenced to more than 12 years for raping teen he met at Lawrence college bar
Those are not the facts.
These are.
The Accuser’s Testimony
The accuser testified at trial that she was drinking before going on the dancefloor. She stated that when on the dancefloor, Wilson lifted up her skirt and sexually assaulted her. She testified that Wilson then led her out of the bar, drunkenly stumbling, to his house a couple of blocks away.
The accuser stated in testimony that she told Wilson, “No, I’m too drunk, I can’t do this,” but Wilson persisted to hold her down and rape her anyway. According to the accuser, she then left Wilson’s home to return to the bar. She met her cousin there, who she originally came to the club with, and the following day she proceeded to go to a hospital for a sexual assault examination.
Mr. Wilson’s Testimony
Mr. Wilson testified that on the dance floor, he and the accuser were consensually kissing and touching each other in a somewhat sexual manner. He stated that he did not have the impression that the accuser was intoxicated.
Mr. Wilson stated that to the contrary of his accuser’s testimony that she stumbled out of the nightclub drunkenly, she, in fact, stumbled on a crack in the sidewalk while walking back to his home. According to Wilson, after asking if she was okay, the accuser jumped onto Mr. Wilson and wrapped her arms and legs around him while continuing to kiss him.
Mr. Wilson said that although consent was not completely verbalized, he believed that they had reached a consensus to proceed to his home and have sexual intercourse. He testified that sexual intercourse never took place.
Mr. Wilson estimated that the two were inside his room for about five minutes before leaving and going back to the nightclub. He testified that his accuser came upstairs with him and she laid on his bed. They then continued to kiss, according to Mr. Wilson, but he never removed her clothes nor did they have sexual intercourse.
He said that he got a text from his friend stating “where you at” and a missed call. He then decided to go see what his friend needed. At the point of telling his accuser that he was leaving, she gave him a “mad look”, according to Mr. Wilson, then they both walked back toward the bar.
The Evidence Presented
At 12:15 AM, surveillance video shows Mr. Wilson and his accuser walking down 14th street to his home, two blocks away, while holding hands.
Surveillance footage of the nightclub did not show the accuser stumbling or being led away by Mr. Wilson as she had testified. Footage also showed that the two were in Wilson’s home for approximately five minutes before returning to the nightclub.
Google Maps states that it takes roughly five minutes to reach Mr. Wilson’s home from the Hawk nightclub by foot. The pair left the nightclub at 12:15 AM. Assuming Google Maps’ calculations are correct, they would have reached Mr. Wilson’s home at 12:20 AM. Surveillance footage shows that the two arrived back at the nightclub at 12:30 AM. Meaning, that they would have had to leave Mr. Wilson’s home at 12:25 AM to get back to the club at the time they did; heavily suggesting that only five minutes were spent in Mr. Wilson’s home as was said in his testimony.
When walking back to the nightclub from Mr. Wilson’s home, surveillance video shows that he and the accuser were not holding hands this time.
Forensic examination found no seminal fluid on the accuser’s clothing or vaginal swab. No corroborating DNA evidence was presented to the court.
Man Sentenced to Prison for Rape With No Hard Evidence · 71 Republic