idb
Gold Member
- Dec 26, 2010
- 14,986
- 2,590
- 265
If my husband and I fall on hard times and need assistance, it would be he and I and as many children as we were able to make in 10 years of marriage. If my husband, I and his 4 other wives fall on hard times, you now have 4 times the amount of children needing supported by the state.
As for abuse, polygamy is ripe with abuse in this nation. Child brides, cults, molestation, abandoning boy children. You will find this with polygamy all over the world.
Should there be a mandated maximum family size then?
You know, just in case they fall on hard times.
Maybe the Chinese were onto something.
In fact, maybe marriage should be discouraged, families with only one parent have one less mouth for the state to feed.
One couple marriage is rife with abuse as well, probably more so than polygamy.
Couldn't help the straw man could you?
We, as a society, generally( because there are plently of people who are not ok with helping support other people's families) accept the responsiblity of helping support families down on their luck. A single polygamous family could fill an entire shelter. It's simply, a fact, I'm not a fan of ignoring facts.
What straw man?
If you're so concerned about large families falling back on the state, maybe family sizes should be limited.
My point is that I think this line of argument is weak.
Any proposal can be extrapolated to negative lengths.