Stumbled on this earlier. Listened to what the guy said. I thought it's another click bait thread, then I looked up what he was discussing. Damn, 9th circuit court just made a ruling several days ago that will provide good arguments for Trump's BRC EO. It will probably go SCOTUS but from the conclusion, I doubt it will be overturned. Not sure if this destroys it but it sure is going to be interesting.
YET WHEN THE CIRCUMSTANCES LEAVE A PERSON IMMUNE FROM THE JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES AT BIRTH.
Illegals born here are subject to the jurisdiction that their parents left.
Formality is a virtue of birthright citizenship. It requires
no inquiry into lineage but is “restricted only by place and
jurisdiction.” Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. at 676. Yet when
circumstances leave a person immune from the jurisdiction
of the United States at birth, this same formality requires a
court to “give full effect” to that restriction. Id. at 694. Thus,
we affirm the judgment of the district court.
YET WHEN THE CIRCUMSTANCES LEAVE A PERSON IMMUNE FROM THE JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES AT BIRTH.
Illegals born here are subject to the jurisdiction that their parents left.
Formality is a virtue of birthright citizenship. It requires
no inquiry into lineage but is “restricted only by place and
jurisdiction.” Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. at 676. Yet when
circumstances leave a person immune from the jurisdiction
of the United States at birth, this same formality requires a
court to “give full effect” to that restriction. Id. at 694. Thus,
we affirm the judgment of the district court.



