Birthright Citizenship…Arguments to begin this week at the Supreme Court.

[jc456]

Natural born is anyone subject to our jurisdiction (meaning we have control over them such as making them pay taxes, or subjecting them to arrest and imprisonment) born within our sovereign territory. Which also includes the airspace above. And the seas (within 12 miles) around.

dude, you are fking stinking up this forum, shut the fk already about what you know nothing about.

 

[Unkotare]

So what do you guys think
the definition of natural born citizen is ?

It is someone who is a US citizen because he was born in the US. Simple.

 

[Unkotare]

P

Babies born here as a result of illegal entry do not create the protective provision of jurisdictional benefits for themselves, They are referred to the country where the parents Are legal to receive that.
Such is the thought process .

That may be what you want it to be, but that is not how it is right now.

 

[WEATHER53]

dude, you are fking stinking up this forum, shut the fk already about what you know nothing about.

Wonder what screen name it was a few days ago.? And how many others it has?
Cowardice of hiding is big for all terrorists

 

[Delldude]

dude, you are fking stinking up this forum, shut the fk already about what you know nothing about.

Knows everything about Juris Dick Shun.

 

[Delldude]

Ratty.

Wasn't Ratty a morph from some other clown?

 

[jc456]

It is someone who is a US citizen because he was born in the US. Simple.

By US citizen parents, nor does the baby have to be born here

 

[Etymology gaslight]

It is someone who is a US citizen because he was born in the US. Simple.

Is he or she natural born
irrespective of their lineage ?

If so why or why not.
Cite examples please
Legal precedent
Elk v. Wilkins
De Vattel
Wong


whatever you got.

Could these guys have been president ?

 

[Unkotare]

By US citizen parents.

Not necessarily. If a person is born in the US, he is a natural born US citizen.

 

[Unkotare]

Is he or she natural born
irrespective of their lineage ?

Yes

 

[Rawley]

Wasn't Ratty a morph from some other clown?

He's got two logins, postman and meaner gene. He's the king of inapt analogies

 

[BluesLegend]

1. Russia launches an armed invasion of the U.S., do we let them and their anchor babies stay?

2. Mexico launches an armed invasion of the U.S., 15 million illegals pour across the border. They get busy RAPING and KILLING Americans. Assaults. Robbery. Home invasions. All manner of SCAMS and FRAUD. Do we let them and their anchor babies stay?

 

[BluesLegend]

Yes

RETARD alert! ^^^

 

[Etymology gaslight]

Yes

Okay how

 

[Etymology gaslight]

1. Russia launches an armed invasion of the U.S., do we let them and their anchor babies stay?

2. Mexico launches an armed invasion of the U.S., 15 million illegals pour across the border. They get busy RAPING and KILLING Americans. Assaults. Robbery. Home invasions. All manner of SCAMS and FRAUD. Do we let them and their anchor babies stay?

Yes,
Some of them are in Congress
hoping to run for president.

This is no joke folks

Karmala
is at the top of the pyramid.

Neither of her parents
were citizens
naturalized
natural born or otherwise.

If it would have happened
no one to blame
but the Supreme Court.

Until recently they haven't taken those kinds of cases.

 

[Etymology gaslight]

He's got two logins, postman and meaner gene. He's the king of inapt analogies

Does Donald Trump know about this ?

 

[Etymology gaslight]

Not necessarily. If a person is born in the US, he is a natural born US citizen.

Do your homework
come back in one year.

You just defined natural born citizen.

If the Supreme Court
doesn't come up with something this time,
then it's your call.

 

[Care4all]

OK you don't want to address the commonality relative to the 14th amendment.

Diplomats, Indians, invaders and illegals have not subjected themselves to our jurisdiction. They do not recognize that our laws apply to them. How we treat them is a totally different topic.

Yes, the illegals have done so, and have no choice in the matter, regardless...unless they are foreign diplomats or foreign military...they are subject to our laws and under our protection while on our soil...

The illegal crossers know that the USA has jurisdiction over them, even before they cross and most all turn themselves over to Border Patrol... And most crossers coming from central and south America have walked through several countries before arriving here, and know while on those country's soil, they were subject to their laws.

When I travel in foreign countries, I know I am subject to their laws when on their soil...

Really, it is common knowledge... even for the lesser educated immigrants. They know once they enter the USA, they are under our jurisdiction.

And in the 1840s there was another suit in NY State, that settled even children of foreign temporary travelers or vacationers, when they bore a child on our soil, the child has US birthright citizenship....

I think we need an amendment to change the author's original text of the 14th amendment...and will be quite surprised if the supreme court ruled differently!

They have surprised me before, so I guess we will see...

 

[Delldude]

I think we need an amendment to change the author's original text of the 14th amendment...and will be quite surprised if t

You can't come to grips with the fact that a definitive interpretation of how the Wong vs US decision 'elaborated' on the amendment without creating a new one requires a new one to possibly overturn the original decision?

 

[Unkotare]

1. Russia launches an armed invasion of the U.S., do we let them and their anchor babies stay?

2. Mexico launches an armed invasion of the U.S., 15 million illegals pour across the border. They get busy RAPING and KILLING Americans. Assaults. Robbery. Home invasions. All manner of SCAMS and FRAUD. Do we let them and their anchor babies stay?

There is no such thing as an "anchor baby."