The T
George S. Patton Party
But write in 'Dreams From My father' that working for private company was like "being behind enemy lines".
Bill Clinton's sex life was for public record but not Mitt's tax returns!
- Thread starter Bloodline
- Start date
But write in 'Dreams From My father' that working for private company was like "being behind enemy lines".
Bill Clinton was sued in a court of law for sexual harassment. Romney has been sued no where. To say that Clinton should not have been questioned about it would have put him above the law denying Paula Jones and Juanita Broderick their day in court. Are we still a nation that believes that no one is above the law? Or is the president free to take whatever woman he desires for the moment he desires them and those women have no recourse? Saddam Hussein's sons were just democrats.
Had Clinton not lied under oath, there would have been no further proceedings, he would not have been impeached nor would he have been disbarred. He would have lost the case, as he did, paid off the judgment and gone on.
It is disturbing that democrats really want democrat presidents to have rights, including sexual rights, that no one else in the nation has. Democrats possess the divine right of Kings.
Had Clinton not lied under oath, there would have been no further proceedings, he would not have been impeached nor would he have been disbarred. He would have lost the case, as he did, paid off the judgment and gone on.
It is disturbing that democrats really want democrat presidents to have rights, including sexual rights, that no one else in the nation has. Democrats possess the divine right of Kings.
Full-Auto
Gold Member
- Jun 13, 2009
- 13,555
- 1,625
- 153
Why are you entitled?
The T
George S. Patton Party
Well said, The T. I regret being out of rep right now.
No problemThese people have to be reminded of real history that they forget when they think it will help them.
The OP is a stooge.
Only one here digging is YOU.
Conservative
Type 40
I find it hilarious that the left assumes tax evasion with zero evidence. I guess anyone who does not release their tax returns to the public is guilty of tax evasion, huh.
That would be about 99.999% of the population, dumb asses.
- Banned
- #47
Um....Clinton was actively being sued by Paula jones in a sexual harassment lawsuit. It was in that context that Linda Tripp came forward with damaging evidence. And you think no questions should have been asked of Clinton regarding that new evidence? What should Paula jones have done with that information? Just sat on it? What should Linda Tripp have done with that evidence? Conceal it? Why do you feel as though Paula jones did not deserve equal consideration under the rules of evidence?
Lonestar_logic
Republic of Texas
- May 13, 2009
- 24,539
- 2,233
- 205
This is an example of what liberals do. They throw out accusations and when challenged they run away.
Ernie S.
Diamond Member
Exactly how is the invasion of Iraq illegal? If I remember correctly, Congress authorized President Bush to use the military to force Sadam to comply with UN resolutions.
Are you going to demand the DOJ release all info on fast and furious too?
aaronleland
Diamond Member
- May 19, 2012
- 33,953
- 11,432
- 1,430
I never minded Clinton as a president but he deserved to be impeached. I don't hold one of the most powerful positions in the world, but if I was caught having sexual relations with anybody at work I would be fired immediately, and rightfully so. Most people would be unless they owned the company.
That said, there is a big difference between a candidate releasing tax returns and releasing college transcripts. Candidates are never asked to release college transcripts. On the other hand it has been a regular tradition since the 70s to release tax records when running for POTUS. The far right is on nothing more than a witch hunt. First it was his birth certificate. Now it's his college transcripts. If he releases that information they will either call the records fake or drag up some other faux conspiracy.
That said, there is a big difference between a candidate releasing tax returns and releasing college transcripts. Candidates are never asked to release college transcripts. On the other hand it has been a regular tradition since the 70s to release tax records when running for POTUS. The far right is on nothing more than a witch hunt. First it was his birth certificate. Now it's his college transcripts. If he releases that information they will either call the records fake or drag up some other faux conspiracy.
Papageorgio
The Ultimate Winner
I agree with you on Clinton.
I also agree on the birth certificate.
On the college transcript, it goes back at least Clinton that college transcripts are released, I remember in the primaries Gore and Clinton bantering about it. To me it's a non-issue, I feel the same with the Tax BS. It really doesn't matter to me, it wouldn't change my vote either way.
Soggy in NOLA
Diamond Member
- Jul 31, 2009
- 40,565
- 5,360
- 1,830
The T
George S. Patton Party
Swallow has opened his old playbook. He wasn't told to use the other.
Soggy in NOLA
Diamond Member
- Jul 31, 2009
- 40,565
- 5,360
- 1,830
Swallow's borderline mentally retarded.
The T
George S. Patton Party
Completely.
Conservative
Type 40
actually, that's not really any of your business. It's between law enforcement and him. All you have to 'prove' Romney did something illegal, is his refusal to release tax returns he is not legally obligated to release. By that libtard logic, 99.999% of the country is guilty of whatever you think Romney is guilty of.
Similar threads
- Locked
