nope. you stated there was no difference between these beliefs below (no proof Ayers planted any bombs)
We were very careful from the moment of the townhouse on to be sure we weren't going to hurt anybody, and we never did hurt anybody. Whenever we put a bomb in a public space, we had figured out all kinds of ways to put checks and balances on the thing and also to get people away from it, and we were remarkably successful.
— Bill Ayers 2003[6]
and what Timothy McVeigh did.
you belittled right wing terrorism in order to link a sixties radical student to President Obama.
like I said in another post, Ayers wasn't even on the radar until the right wing noise machine resurrected him from political oblivion.
Wow are you gullable. So, in 2003, 30 years later, the domestic terrorist HIMSELF tells you he purposely tried not to harm anyone, and you BELIEVE it? Isn't it FAR more likely that he just sucked at building bombs, was embarrassed that he was so ineffective, and in retrospect decided to take a moral high ground in his newfound professorship to claim he is an honorable terrorist?
God d**n liberals are gullable. Hey, truthmatters, did you see the new Bin Laden video? He said "We didn't intend to hit the buildings, we intended to fly by, miss them and just scare everyone a lot, but there was a mechanical malfunction in BOTH planes and we lost steering and had a bad accident. Sorry, we didn't mean it."
You'd be first in line to say "Well, they didn't MEAN to hit the towers, he said so himself."
Or better yet, if you were a NYPD detective, interviewing a guy arrested for shooting at people but not hitting anyone, you would take a plea of "I intentionally missed, just to scare everyone, I purposely and carefully aimed around them for effect and did not want to harm anyone." You'd let the guy walk, wouldn't you?