So, help me out here.
What does an edited and out of context Dept. of Agriculture employee's speech at a NAACP conference that was released by Breitbart have to do with any of the things you've mentioned?
The "scandal" here was the video. She was fired in response to the video, which was later proven to be edited and out of context.
How does this help Obama and Holder?
Why was the NAALCP so fast to nail her? Must you really ask this?
Hasn't the recent crap with the NBPP piqued your interest?
The NAALCP proclimation on the Tea Party?
Does it even rise to the occasion for YOU to ask why the Obama DOJ has a
Double Standard?
What of the Conviction of an Oakland COP that was convicted of Manslughter?
What of The Fifth Amendment and Double Jepoardy in the DOJ review of that case?
Every bit of this is diversionary tactics to label The Tea Party, and those that oppose Obama and what he's done thusfar as
Rascist.
So why not NAIL a woman whom made comments long ago...to
distract...or CLOUD what they're really doing with the upcoming Mid-Terms?
And that word would be out of the four...[Drum Roll.....]
Obfuscate.