Big Bain Backfire

[Conservative]

Are you laughing or gagging on Obama's dick ?

Hard to type anything smart with that going on ?

Which must be a lot because you NEVER say anything that isn't stupid.

80% success with his companies is not being a corporate raider.

I notice you morons never bring up Steel Dynamics or try to explain that one away.

STAPLES.

Bain Capital invested $600,000 in STAPLES. They now employ 70,000 people.

Then there's...
Domino’s Pizza
Sealy
Brookstone
Sports Authority
etc
etc
etc


BTW, on a side note... Romney has degrees from Harvard law AND Harvard Business schools.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gyw7uXe1Dqk]Romney: Obama Spent Too Long at Harvard (But Less Than I Did!) - YouTube[/ame]

"Or maybe just not enough time working in the real world" is the important part of what Romney says there.

He was correct. Obama did NOT spend enough time working in the real world", and his performance shows it.

 

[Listening]

Are you laughing or gagging on Obama's dick ?

Hard to type anything smart with that going on ?

Which must be a lot because you NEVER say anything that isn't stupid.

80% success with his companies is not being a corporate raider.

I notice you morons never bring up Steel Dynamics or try to explain that one away.

STAPLES.

Bain Capital invested $600,000 in STAPLES. They now employ 70,000 people.

Then there's...
Domino’s Pizza
Sealy
Brookstone
Sports Authority
etc
etc
etc


BTW, on a side note... Romney has degrees from Harvard law AND Harvard Business schools.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gyw7uXe1Dqk]Romney: Obama Spent Too Long at Harvard (But Less Than I Did!) - YouTube[/ame]

Ran past the good stuff looking for a way to deflect.

Got it.

 

[Sallow]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH


Robmoney will be forced to stand there and defend distroying jobs to line his pockets when there were pleanty of ways he could have made money instead.

He CHOSE to be a corporate raider.

Idiot...

Companies are not sold for less than the value of their assets.

To the contrary, they are sold for a multiple (usually 4-7 times) of their net margin...a number that is infinitely higher than the value of their assets.

You are naive...and the Obama team knows folks like you are naive...so they have you believing things that are not only NOT TRUE, but makes absolutely no sense....

Yet...

You regurgitate it as fact anyway.

Thus why you are an idiot.

Bottom line is they didn't lose money on the deal..and still came away with a healthy profit.

 

[SniperFire]

If you think what Bain Capital did to that steel company in Kansas City is venture capitalism, you need to go back to school.

you mean their attempt to save a company in a failing industry...and actually keeping it alive for 8 years beyond its projected date of closure?

Funny when you think that Obama pumped a half a billion dollars in a company in an industry that is slated as the "wave of the future" and was unable to keep it alive for more than a year.

So, in essence, what Obama referrs to as a Bain (Romney) failure, lasted 8 more years than his own attempt at "saving a company".

Curious...where is the outrage over Obama costing all of those Solyndra folks their jobs?

Their main product was rebar, moron. We were entering the building boom when they went under.

gawd, this is funny.

'When Bain bought the Kansas City mill in 1993, steel was a scene of carnage. Global players were pouring out cheap products, and America's high-cost steel plants couldn't compete. The industry had lost 200,000 jobs in preceding years. In 1992 alone, the six largest U.S. steel mills had lost a combined $3 billion. Armco, the company Bain would buy the plant from, would lose $641 million in 1993.'

Strassel: Vampire Capitalism? Please - WSJ.com

 

[Jarhead]

If you think what Bain Capital did to that steel company in Kansas City is venture capitalism, you need to go back to school.

you mean their attempt to save a company in a failing industry...and actually keeping it alive for 8 years beyond its projected date of closure?

Funny when you think that Obama pumped a half a billion dollars in a company in an industry that is slated as the "wave of the future" and was unable to keep it alive for more than a year.

So, in essence, what Obama referrs to as a Bain (Romney) failure, lasted 8 more years than his own attempt at "saving a company".

Curious...where is the outrage over Obama costing all of those Solyndra folks their jobs?

Their main product was rebar, moron. We were entering the building boom when they went under.

Did you raise wood when Bain took them over, saddled them with debt, pulled out a huge profit, and let what remained to go belly up, with us taxpayers to cover their pensions?

I suggest you do some reading asshole. This post above is full of so many untruths, it hurts my eyes to read it.

You know NOTHING about the steel industry.....WHAT THEY MADE WAS NOT RELEVANT you ******* tool.

 

[Listening]

If you think what Bain Capital did to that steel company in Kansas City is venture capitalism, you need to go back to school.

you mean their attempt to save a company in a failing industry...and actually keeping it alive for 8 years beyond its projected date of closure?

Funny when you think that Obama pumped a half a billion dollars in a company in an industry that is slated as the "wave of the future" and was unable to keep it alive for more than a year.

So, in essence, what Obama referrs to as a Bain (Romney) failure, lasted 8 more years than his own attempt at "saving a company".

Curious...where is the outrage over Obama costing all of those Solyndra folks their jobs?

Their main product was rebar, moron. We were entering the building boom when they went under.

Did you raise wood when Bain took them over, saddled them with debt, pulled out a huge profit, and let what remained to go belly up, with us taxpayers to cover their pensions?

Now, it's out....

You are either a zealot.

Or you are a total moron.

As has already been shown....the Chinese were hitting the U.S. with cheap steel and that is why the market went soft for them. Other steel companies failed at the same time.

Do you ever do any reading before you make claims that clearly show you have your head up your ass ?

 

[Dick Tuck]

Bain ran the company dry

Really?

Back that up, asswipe.


LOL

He can't. Obama's dick is too far up his ass

I gather that you're getting your kicks sucking his salad.

Do you use toilet paper to clean your tongue before brushing? Or is brushing something you never learned.

 

[Sallow]

STAPLES.

Bain Capital invested $600,000 in STAPLES. They now employ 70,000 people.

Then there's...
Domino’s Pizza
Sealy
Brookstone
Sports Authority
etc
etc
etc


BTW, on a side note... Romney has degrees from Harvard law AND Harvard Business schools.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gyw7uXe1Dqk]Romney: Obama Spent Too Long at Harvard (But Less Than I Did!) - YouTube[/ame]

"Or maybe just not enough time working in the real world" is the important part of what Romney says there.

He was correct. Obama did NOT spend enough time working in the real world", and his performance shows it.

What "real" world?

Who want to go down that road?

You want to start defining what sort of work counts as "real"?

Okay..I worked as a mover/trucker for 11 years. If you haven't ever done any physical labor..you haven't really worked.

Thus..Romney's NEVER worked in the real world either.

 

[Jarhead]

you mean their attempt to save a company in a failing industry...and actually keeping it alive for 8 years beyond its projected date of closure?

Funny when you think that Obama pumped a half a billion dollars in a company in an industry that is slated as the "wave of the future" and was unable to keep it alive for more than a year.

So, in essence, what Obama referrs to as a Bain (Romney) failure, lasted 8 more years than his own attempt at "saving a company".

Curious...where is the outrage over Obama costing all of those Solyndra folks their jobs?

Their main product was rebar, moron. We were entering the building boom when they went under.

Did you raise wood when Bain took them over, saddled them with debt, pulled out a huge profit, and let what remained to go belly up, with us taxpayers to cover their pensions?

Now, it's out....

You are either a zealot.

Or you are a total moron.

As has already been shown....the Chinese were hitting the U.S. with cheap steel and that is why the market went soft for them. Other steel companies failed at the same time.

Do you ever do any reading before you make claims that clearly show you have your head up your ass ?

This....ABOVE...

It had nothing to do with what the steel was used for. It had to do with the cost to produce steel.

Thus why the steel industry was dying in the US.

 

[Listening]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH


Robmoney will be forced to stand there and defend distroying jobs to line his pockets when there were pleanty of ways he could have made money instead.

He CHOSE to be a corporate raider.

Idiot...

Companies are not sold for less than the value of their assets.

To the contrary, they are sold for a multiple (usually 4-7 times) of their net margin...a number that is infinitely higher than the value of their assets.

You are naive...and the Obama team knows folks like you are naive...so they have you believing things that are not only NOT TRUE, but makes absolutely no sense....

Yet...

You regurgitate it as fact anyway.

Thus why you are an idiot.

Bottom line is they didn't lose money on the deal..and still came away with a healthy profit.

Not by their standards.

You don't sell banks and cities on a bond issue, then see a company go bankrupt and not pay a price. The next time you are in the capital markets....that is going to get used against you big time.

If you think Bain was laughing while GTS went belly up...you are nothing but a tool.

 

[Jarhead]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH


Robmoney will be forced to stand there and defend distroying jobs to line his pockets when there were pleanty of ways he could have made money instead.

He CHOSE to be a corporate raider.

Idiot...

Companies are not sold for less than the value of their assets.

To the contrary, they are sold for a multiple (usually 4-7 times) of their net margin...a number that is infinitely higher than the value of their assets.

You are naive...and the Obama team knows folks like you are naive...so they have you believing things that are not only NOT TRUE, but makes absolutely no sense....

Yet...

You regurgitate it as fact anyway.

Thus why you are an idiot.

Bottom line is they didn't lose money on the deal..and still came away with a healthy profit.

Actuially, when you factor in the cost of money, the profit was not nearly as healthy as you think.

And while they did it, they saved those jobs for 8 years.

Now...lets compare that to Obamas bailout of Solyndra.

They saved those jobs for....wait...they didnt save them at all.

Where is your outrage?

 

[Dick Tuck]

you mean their attempt to save a company in a failing industry...and actually keeping it alive for 8 years beyond its projected date of closure?

Funny when you think that Obama pumped a half a billion dollars in a company in an industry that is slated as the "wave of the future" and was unable to keep it alive for more than a year.

So, in essence, what Obama referrs to as a Bain (Romney) failure, lasted 8 more years than his own attempt at "saving a company".

Curious...where is the outrage over Obama costing all of those Solyndra folks their jobs?

Their main product was rebar, moron. We were entering the building boom when they went under.

Did you raise wood when Bain took them over, saddled them with debt, pulled out a huge profit, and let what remained to go belly up, with us taxpayers to cover their pensions?

Now, it's out....

You are either a zealot.

Or you are a total moron.

As has already been shown....the Chinese were hitting the U.S. with cheap steel and that is why the market went soft for them. Other steel companies failed at the same time.

Do you ever do any reading before you make claims that clearly show you have your head up your ass ?

So that's why Bain decided to saddle the company with debt, immediately pull out their investment with a huge profit, and leave the pension liability to us Real Americans?

If the problem was dumping, why didn't Bush deal with it? It wasn't about dumping, moron. It was about sucking a company dry, and asking for the taxpayer to clean up their mess.

 

[Jarhead]

Their main product was rebar, moron. We were entering the building boom when they went under.

Did you raise wood when Bain took them over, saddled them with debt, pulled out a huge profit, and let what remained to go belly up, with us taxpayers to cover their pensions?

Now, it's out....

You are either a zealot.

Or you are a total moron.

As has already been shown....the Chinese were hitting the U.S. with cheap steel and that is why the market went soft for them. Other steel companies failed at the same time.

Do you ever do any reading before you make claims that clearly show you have your head up your ass ?

So that's why Bain decided to saddle the company with debt, immediately pull out their investment with a huge profit, and leave the pension liability to us Real Americans?

If the problem was dumping, why didn't Bush deal with it? It wasn't about dumping, moron. It was about sucking a company dry, and asking for the taxpayer to clean up their mess.

wow...just ******* wow.

You are so out there, it pains me to read your crap.

When you are able to show me how a company can buy something that is failing for $1 and sell it for $2 without increasing its value...then I will respond to you.

But since you wont be able to, I will simply continue to ignore your childish, unfounded claims.

 

[SniperFire]

Their main product was rebar, moron. We were entering the building boom when they went under.

Did you raise wood when Bain took them over, saddled them with debt, pulled out a huge profit, and let what remained to go belly up, with us taxpayers to cover their pensions?

Now, it's out....

You are either a zealot.

Or you are a total moron.

As has already been shown....the Chinese were hitting the U.S. with cheap steel and that is why the market went soft for them. Other steel companies failed at the same time.

Do you ever do any reading before you make claims that clearly show you have your head up your ass ?

If the problem was dumping, why didn't Bush deal with it?

I used to think you were an idiot. I was wrong.

You are a complete idiot.

 

[Jarhead]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH


Robmoney will be forced to stand there and defend distroying jobs to line his pockets when there were pleanty of ways he could have made money instead.

He CHOSE to be a corporate raider.

Idiot...

Companies are not sold for less than the value of their assets.

To the contrary, they are sold for a multiple (usually 4-7 times) of their net margin...a number that is infinitely higher than the value of their assets.

You are naive...and the Obama team knows folks like you are naive...so they have you believing things that are not only NOT TRUE, but makes absolutely no sense....

Yet...

You regurgitate it as fact anyway.

Thus why you are an idiot.

Bottom line is they didn't lose money on the deal..and still came away with a healthy profit.

so lets see....

They bought a failing company....

Kept it alive for 8 years beyond itys projected failure date...

And actually made a profit on it when they closed it down......of course, becuase the industry was dead and keeeping it open at that point would have resulted in many losses.

And you see that as a bad thing?

You prefer all of those employees lose their jobs 8 years earlier...and the original ownership losing everything?

Wow....kind of selfish of you if you ask me.

 

[Dick Tuck]

Idiot...

Companies are not sold for less than the value of their assets.

To the contrary, they are sold for a multiple (usually 4-7 times) of their net margin...a number that is infinitely higher than the value of their assets.

You are naive...and the Obama team knows folks like you are naive...so they have you believing things that are not only NOT TRUE, but makes absolutely no sense....

Yet...

You regurgitate it as fact anyway.

Thus why you are an idiot.

Bottom line is they didn't lose money on the deal..and still came away with a healthy profit.

Actuially, when you factor in the cost of money, the profit was not nearly as healthy as you think.

And while they did it, they saved those jobs for 8 years.

Now...lets compare that to Obamas bailout of Solyndra.

They saved those jobs for....wait...they didnt save them at all.

Where is your outrage?

Pulling off a three year 40% ROI isn't too shabby. Using corporate rape to do it happens. Just don't tell me that Mr. Etch-a-Sketch is a job creator.

 

[Dick Tuck]

Now, it's out....

You are either a zealot.

Or you are a total moron.

As has already been shown....the Chinese were hitting the U.S. with cheap steel and that is why the market went soft for them. Other steel companies failed at the same time.

Do you ever do any reading before you make claims that clearly show you have your head up your ass ?

If the problem was dumping, why didn't Bush deal with it?

I used to think you were an idiot. I was wrong.

You are a complete idiot.

No, I mean and meant that you're a lying scumbag.

My facts regarding Bain are accurate. Pretending that Md. Etch-a-Sketch is a job creator is total bullshit. Perhaps you should clean your shovel from time to time.

 

[Jarhead]

Bottom line is they didn't lose money on the deal..and still came away with a healthy profit.

Actuially, when you factor in the cost of money, the profit was not nearly as healthy as you think.

And while they did it, they saved those jobs for 8 years.

Now...lets compare that to Obamas bailout of Solyndra.

They saved those jobs for....wait...they didnt save them at all.

Where is your outrage?

Pulling off a three year 40% ROI isn't too shabby. Using corporate rape to do it happens. Just don't tell me that Mr. Etch-a-Sketch is a job creator.

lmfao...

SO they had a 40% annual return and decided they wanted to shut it down for the value of the assets....and, of course, not get that 40% retuirn year after year.....

Sure...that makes sense.

Do you not see what a fool this administration is making out of you with the cloudy information they release?

lol...I am getting a 40% return on my investment, but I prefer to sell out.

Sure.....makes all the sense iun the world.

Idiots......

 

[freedombecki]

Obama is in a sheer panic right now as his attack on capitalism has blown up in his face.

Big Bain Backfire | Mitt Romney for President

That's very true, SniperFire. From your link:

President Obama’s attacks on free enterprise have triggered a backlash among many—even among those in his own party. In just the past few days, everyone from former advisors to his own surrogates have criticized the Obama campaign’s attack on free enterprise. With no record to run on, it is no surprise that the Obama campaign has resorted to misleading attacks that have been disavowed by its own supporters

His attacks on free enterprise will go down as the reason he only carried 1 or 2 states, if that many. People are truly "sick and tired" of reading about the Democrat assault on the energy industry, states that didn't go Obama, Governors that didn't go Obama, etc.

Obama has used his power to divide the extremists in his party against good common sense of using the Republic's government as it was planned--to provide defense for the American people by using business prosperity and American individualism to accomplish it.

His takeover of the private sector he did in his first year still needs to be undone as the "don't read, just pass" bills foolishly proposed by Democrats during his first term.

He's the enemy of the people's bread and butter and the friend of promoting dependency.

The right is right for America. It wants to raise a healthy approach to prosperity, healthy people, and a heart for those who are truly, truly in need of care. Equality is the only way to truly erase color lines, not spewing ad nauseum about irrelevant wrongs that have already been righted by 200 years of legislation to assure equality among the diverse people who live here.

I'm looking forward to a conservative landslide and the reinstatement of order and business as usual next term.

This creation of public enemies out of political opponents is a fail. Obama and his collaborators must go. If the Democrat Party wants to stay alive, it needs to get back to basics, reconnect with American roots, encourage good things for people, and not chase down things that have already failed and are not tried-and-true for major investment purposes of the people's treasury. The giveaways to Congressional family and friends bit must go. It isn't right.

 

[SniperFire]

My facts regarding Bain are accurate.

Really?

Explain your remark that Bain milked the company 'dry' that was losing money and was slated for closure.

Once you explain that one, we will revisit your other nonsensical 'facts' in this thread and have you explain them.


You are fast approaching troll status.