I don't agree with that. We would spent more time reviewing the tape(s) who's in the right or wrong, and you're opening completely new way for fraud over fraud.
That's the parties problem, not mine. If there is no fraud, the other side can spend all they want looking for it. If we think they cheated, we can spend all we want trying to prove it.
When you prove it, you throw the penalty flag.
The only way to completely eliminate the fraud is to make the voting universal for everyone. What can be done?
One, everyone know when the election day is. Either make the election day on the weekend when most people are not working, or make it a holiday. All voting in person. You don't show up, it's on you. If you know you cant vote in person, do what they do in Mexico. You go and pick your ballot in person, you return it in person with your ID/voter ID to proof it's you that voted.
Two, put your name on the ballot, with and ID number and SSN, and sign it. If any of those doesn't match the records, void it. It's easy to find out if you voted more than once, there can't be two identical ballots. Severe punishment for fraud. Simple as that.
You have to keep the vote secret. You can't have someone's identity on the ballot. That's the shortest path to political retaliations.
You have to validate the voter at the registration level, count only legitimate ballots, and still maintain secrecy of the vote. Those are the baseline req's.
I'd be just fine with all in-person voting. My State hasn't elected a republican in statewide office since we went 100% mail-in. But I don't think it's going away, so I think we have to work the problem of verifying a high-percentage mail-in election.
Agree, fraud doesn't happen with in-person voting. A person comes in and shows his ID and gets checked off the poll book, he gets handed the ballot. That's a whole lot more trustworthy than a box that anyone can walk up to and drop in a ballot.
And "ballot on demand" systems, and ballots you can print on your home computer. Imagine if we were so cavalier about currency? Surely a ballot is as important as a dollar?
~~~~~~~~~~
Also, you were talking about Georgia earlier. I provided the video from the hearing in the post above.
Video evidence show them counting those ballots without poll watchers present, when everyone supposed to be out. They brought cases of ballots from underneath a table. There are affidavits under perjury.
Pennsylvania said their ballot boxes were unconstitutional from the start, aka fraud.
Arizona has resolution to decertify on floor.
Wisconsin has resolution to decertify on floor.
Georgia just received 4000 affidavits to audit, which will result in another decertify.
Pennsylvania will be next... Then Michigan... Then the country, I hope.
Oh yeah, I know about all the crap that went on in those places. But decertification is a nebulous thing, not so much at the State level- they can pass a resolution, but what does it mean? At the Federal level, there just isn't any real mechanism that I can see to actually recall an elector.
Barring something I can't even conceive, the ship sailed on January 6. Reason being, there are no "electors" to recall. They have a singular function, and they cease to exist after they cast their vote. That's the way the SCOTUS views the electoral college. Legally speaking, there is no electoral college right now. A new one will be formed in 2024, that's made up of electors for whoever those candidates are.
So it's tough. What isn't as hard is to take back the Congress this year, slam the door on the rest of the crazy leftist agenda, and put DJT back in place in 24 with maybe some more reliable republicans behind him.