Biden vs Trump 2024 from Now till November 5, 2024

[Sixties Fan]

VIRAL GAFFES: Trump Talks About Poll Numbers Against Obama, Warns Biden Is Taking Nation Into WWII​

 

[Sixties Fan]

Trump, who led the longest government shutdown in US history, calls on Republicans to let it happen again in 9 days so they can 'defund these political prosecutions against me'​

Americans are nine days away from experiencing yet another government shutdown. Former President Donald Trump, who led a 35-day shutdown in 2019, is suggesting Republicans should let it happen again.

On Wednesday night, Trump took to his social media site Truth Social to offer advice to Republican lawmakers. If Congress doesn't reach an agreement on funding before September 30, the federal government will shut down — and with that deadline just nine days away, the GOP has yet to find a viable solution to keep the government funded.

Trump, who was responsible for the longest government shutdown in US history, urged Republicans to make the most of the "very important deadline" to keep the government funded.

"Republicans in Congress can and must defund all aspects of Crooked Joe Biden's weaponized Government that refuses to close the Border, and treats half the Country as Enemies of the State," Trump posted on his site. "This is also the last chance to defund these political prosecutions against me and other Patriots. They failed on the debt limit, but they must not fail now. Use the power of the purse and defend the Country!"

With regards to the debt limit, Trump is referring to the concessions Republicans had to make with Democrats in order to raise the limit and ensure the government could continue covering its spending obligations. They did not get the spending cuts they had hoped to achieve within that bill, which is why Trump is urging them to hold the line on government funding.


(full article online)

Trump, who led the longest government shutdown in US history, calls on Republicans to let it happen again in 9 days so they can 'defund these political prosecutions against me'

Former President Donald Trump took to Truth Social to urge the GOP to hold the line on the"very important" government funding deadline on September 30.

www.yahoo.com

 

[Sixties Fan]

 

[Sixties Fan]

Look, at no point does any of what Trump said approach a “policy.” It's quite obviously meant to evade a question that he doesn't want to answer, because he probably can’t remember what his past answers were or what his rally crowds have best responded to.

"We'll end up with peace on that issue for the first time in 52 years" makes it sound like he thinks “abortion” is a country and he's going to send his son-in-law over to patch things up and look for potential business deals. "I'm going to come together with all groups" is semi-coherent bullshit, at best, but when tacked onto an issue that regularly inspires far-right terrorists, it borders on punchworthy.

What’s most clear here is that Trump still hasn't prepared at all for this election, for being president, for anything.

But more than that, it again suggests that Trump was a figurehead president whose advisers steered toward supporting their own far-right positions, but who himself simply did not give a damn.

Trump, of course, boasts about appointing the Supreme Court justices who struck down Roe v. Wade and ended the constitutional right to abortion. And on the 2016 campaign trail, he portrayed himself as viciously anti-abortion, saying there "has to be some form of punishment" for women who get abortions, even as he refused to commit to what that punishment would be.

Apparently, the man has watched enough television to know that this is not what the American public wants to hear. And yet he doesn't have a new policy to share, maybe because he's been too busy getting indicted and his advisers haven’t had time to tell him what his position should be.

There's no point in pretending that Trump’s words indicate what he would do if, God help us all, he returns to the White House.

The Post could have split this story into two articles. The first could cover what they were aiming for—a serious look at the evolving and evasive positions of each Republican presidential candidate on abortion. And the second article could be devoted to pointing out how Trump has no opinion and is just riffing in said opinion’s absence. It could cover how he does this all the time.

After all, that, too, is a big story. It might even be the bigger story. Because if America wants that (again), then what’s that say about America?


(full article online)

The press needs to stop pretending Trump’s word salads amount to policy thoughts

There's a Washington Post story today that tries to turn Donald Trump's thoughts on abortion into a serious report on the Republican presidential candidates' anti-abortion policies. That was a mistake, of course, because Trump does not have policies....

www.dailykos.com

 

[Lastamender]

Look, at no point does any of what Trump said approach a “policy.” It's quite obviously meant to evade a question that he doesn't want to answer, because he probably can’t remember what his past answers were or what his rally crowds have best responded to.

"We'll end up with peace on that issue for the first time in 52 years" makes it sound like he thinks “abortion” is a country and he's going to send his son-in-law over to patch things up and look for potential business deals. "I'm going to come together with all groups" is semi-coherent bullshit, at best, but when tacked onto an issue that regularly inspires far-right terrorists, it borders on punchworthy.

What’s most clear here is that Trump still hasn't prepared at all for this election, for being president, for anything.

But more than that, it again suggests that Trump was a figurehead president whose advisers steered toward supporting their own far-right positions, but who himself simply did not give a damn.

Trump, of course, boasts about appointing the Supreme Court justices who struck down Roe v. Wade and ended the constitutional right to abortion. And on the 2016 campaign trail, he portrayed himself as viciously anti-abortion, saying there "has to be some form of punishment" for women who get abortions, even as he refused to commit to what that punishment would be.

Apparently, the man has watched enough television to know that this is not what the American public wants to hear. And yet he doesn't have a new policy to share, maybe because he's been too busy getting indicted and his advisers haven’t had time to tell him what his position should be.

There's no point in pretending that Trump’s words indicate what he would do if, God help us all, he returns to the White House.

The Post could have split this story into two articles. The first could cover what they were aiming for—a serious look at the evolving and evasive positions of each Republican presidential candidate on abortion. And the second article could be devoted to pointing out how Trump has no opinion and is just riffing in said opinion’s absence. It could cover how he does this all the time.

After all, that, too, is a big story. It might even be the bigger story. Because if America wants that (again), then what’s that say about America?


(full article online)

The press needs to stop pretending Trump’s word salads amount to policy thoughts

There's a Washington Post story today that tries to turn Donald Trump's thoughts on abortion into a serious report on the Republican presidential candidates' anti-abortion policies. That was a mistake, of course, because Trump does not have policies....

www.dailykos.com

Daily Kos? Really?

 

[Sixties Fan]

Daily Kos? Really?

Yeah, really. Since you cannot read well, and have issues with facts, go on bashing any and all sources.

Daily Kos !!!!! Really. !!!!!!

 

[Lastamender]

Yeah, really. Since you cannot read well, and have issues with facts, go on bashing any and all sources.

Daily Kos !!!!! Really. !!!!!!

I usually do not bash sources but if any site deserves it it, it is that rag. It is as bad as the NYT and the WP.

 

[dblack]

There have been many sayings in the Media and on the boards. Is Biden too old for a second turn? Has Biden damaged the country? Is Trump capable of understanding the issues? Does he understand what he says in his rallies and interviews on television?

We are about 14 months until the election. Clearly, for me, Trump will be the candidate for the Republicans, Biden for the Democrats.

Just say "No!"

 

[Lastamender]

Just say "No!"

Save that for the coming Covid lies. or do you have your mask on already?

 

[dblack]

Save that for the coming Covid lies. or do you have your mask on already?

 

[Sixties Fan]

I usually do not bash sources but if any site deserves it it, it is that rag. It is as bad as the NYT and the WP.

Sure......because you, the last of the last, says so.

 

[Lastamender]

Sure......because you, the last of the last, says so.

I have more credibility than someone like you who repeats the narratives like their life depended on it. So there is that.

 

[Sixties Fan]

I have more credibility than someone like you who repeats the narratives like their life depended on it. So there is that.

All you have done is say that Daily Kos is blah, blah blah.

Finding evidence to counter what they have reported is something else. Something you are incapable and unable to do.

So, your credibility without any evidence is worth ZERO.

 

[dblack]

I have more credibility than someone like you who repeats the narratives like their life depended on it. So there is that.

You have the best credibility! Explosive even.

 

[Lastamender]

All you have done is say that Daily Kos is blah, blah blah.

Finding evidence to counter what they have reported is something else. Something you are incapable and unable to do.

So, your credibility without any evidence is worth ZERO.

You assholes deny any evidence presented anyway.

 

[Sixties Fan]

You assholes deny any evidence presented anyway.

You never present any evidence.

November 5, 2024

Go Vote !!!!

 

[Sixties Fan]

Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion striking down Roe v. Wade triggered the emergence of an invasive system of surveillance and control targeting women as a class.

In Nebraska, a mother and daughter pleaded guilty to charges related to the daughter having an abortion after their Facebook messages about acquiring abortion pills were handed over to authorities. In Texas—where the law grants those who snitch on acquaintances, friends, or loved ones who end a pregnancy financial remuneration—legislators want to outlaw searching for information about the procedure on the internet, and make traveling to get an abortion illegal. Aiming to extend their command over people’s lives into states that Republicans do not control, conservative judges have revived archaic federal laws seeking to ban the delivery of abortion medication all over the country. Every day, the conservative legal movement seeks to discover new ways to extend state domination over people’s private lives in order to prevent women from deciding for themselves whether to have a child.

Alito, despite drawing a road map for repealing the 20th century, is not the man primarily responsible for these laws or the other attempts to impose right-wing morality on Americans who do not share conservative principles or premises. The person most responsible for what might be the greatest assault on individual freedom since the mid-20th century is Donald Trump, who appointed fully one-third of the justices on the Supreme Court, hard-core right-wing ideologues who overturned Roe just as he promised they would.


(full article online)

Trump Is the Reason Women Can’t Get Abortions

The former president wants you to believe he is a moderate on abortion. He isn’t.

www.theatlantic.com

 

[Sixties Fan]

 

[Sixties Fan]

 

[Sixties Fan]