Biden, the Leahy Law, and other mistakes.

berg80

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2017
Messages
24,101
Reaction score
20,106
Points
2,320
As Joe's presidency comes to a close an assessment of his mistakes is called for. All presidents make them for reasons both of omission and commission. Let's look at his. First and foremost, IMO, was a violation of the Leahy Law.

Israel and the Leahy Law


The Hamas October 7 terrorist attack on Israel, and Israel’s response to it, have focused attention on the role of U.S. security assistance in Gaza. United States law requires foreign nations, including Israel, to comply with international human rights standards and international humanitarian law to receive U.S. security assistance. The best known of these laws, the “Leahy law,” mandates that U.S. security assistance may not be provided to units of foreign security forces that are alleged to have committed gross violations of human rights.
For seven and a half years, I served as director of the State Department office that leads Leahy vetting of foreign security units. I have seen how even and fair application of the Leahy law is key to U.S. foreign policy and credibility abroad. But when it comes to Israel — the story so far is about a lack of application.
U.S. State Department spokespersons assert that the department complies with the Leahy law via “ongoing processes,” and that treatment of Israel under the Leahy law is the same as for any other country.
Both assertions are incorrect.


There's no gray area here. We have enough reliable reporting about what happened in Gaza to know Israel committed human rights atrocities. Biden kept the flow of military assistance to Israel going anyway.

Immigration. In his zeal to reverse the imposition of inhumane treatment on immigrants by djt, felon, Biden failed to address one of the underlying problems with immigration policy. Namely, making the criteria for those who qualify to get asylum more strict. When he finally did act during the summer of 2024 it had the desired affect of reducing the number of immigrants trying to get in to the country. But his legacy on immigration had already been established.

Attempted border crossings dropped to the lowest level of the Biden presidency in September​


Afghanistan. Even though a review of the Abbey Gate suicide bombing by a member of ISIS determined it was not preventable, it served to worsen what already had become a chaotic withdrawal. Part of the reason falls on Biden for not fully considering the ramifications of the mixed intel he received on the stability of the Afghan military and the government. Part falls on djt, felon, for the conditions he set when his admin agreed to the withdrawal. Part falls on the cowardice of the Afghanis.

DEI. His initiatives with respect to DEI were successful and arguably necessary in an attempt to further level the playing field for employment in the federal workplace. But he should have been savvy enough to realize how they would be politically exploited by cynics and bigots.

The pardon. I understand the nature of the criticism and the motivation for it. My problem with pardoning Hunter isn't so much the pardon itself but that Joe went back on his word. From my perspective it was otherwise defensible for two reasons. 1. Hunter did not receive the same treatment by the justice system anyone else would have received. He was prosecuted because he is Joe's son. 2. Joe had a reasonable belief the DoJ under djt, felon, would have harassed his son after announcing its intension to abuse the power of the Justice Dept.
 
Even though a review of the Abbey Gate suicide bombing by a member of ISIS determined it was not preventable
It was preventable. They were tracking the bomber with a drone and could had blown him up before he got there. But Biden’s goon squad said no.
 
It was preventable. They were tracking the bomber with a drone and could had blown him up before he got there. But Biden’s goon squad said no.
I was so hoping the first reply to the thread wouldn't be a lie. Oh well.

Two of those five topics included the circumstances surrounding the alleged confirmation of the description of the alleged attacker; as well as the circumstances related to the request for the authority to engage that individual.
https://www.defense.gov/News/News-S...tial-findings-identifies-attacker/#pop8014192
Regarding identification of the alleged attacker and the request to engage that perceived threat, the supplemental review found that the chain of command's proper use of the rules of engagement allowed the Marines on the ground to avoid making any potentially lethal mistakes amid all of the confusion brought on by having to deal with throngs of Afghan evacuees, according to one Marine supplemental review team official.

"Leaders constantly engaged service members and Marines on the ground throughout the evacuation to ensure they understood the use of force to deal with the unruly crowds, the Taliban and the constant threat before them," the official said.

One topic of some contention the review team sought to address was if, on the morning of the attack, Marine snipers had or had not positively identified a particular individual who appeared to stand out from the rest of the evacuees — a so-called "bald man in black" — as a threat worthy of engaging.
https://www.defense.gov/News/News-S...tial-findings-identifies-attacker/#pop8014189
The review found that the battalion commander on scene properly evaluated the request to engage the individual by applying the set rules of engagement.

"The battalion commander exercised sound military judgement to conclude that the 'bald man in black' was not a lawful military target … Any portrayal of these events showing the battalion commander did not understand these events [is] just not supported by the evidence," the official said.

"It is clear [the battalion commander] did not approve the snipers to engage the 'bald man in black,' and it was clear that this decision was understood."

As to the actual attacker, the review team determined that there was very little chance of identifying al-Logari prior to him detonating his body-worn IED.
 
LOL come on. Even you can’t believe this nonsense.

Biden allowed at least ten million illegals in, probably double that.
I was so hoping the second reply to the thread wouldn't be unsubstantiated horseshit. Oh well.
 
I'm reluctant to give the Biden admin credit for anything related to the ME conflict after ignoring the Leahy Law for months. But the cease fire is a notable achievement trumples would be jumping up and down with their hair on fire over if it happened during Dotard's tenure.
 
Godzilla says it best.
1737043511849.gif
 
Israel ramps up deadly airstrikes on Gaza after ceasefire deal is reached

TEL AVIV — The Israel-Hamas ceasefire deal will go into effect too late for Akram Abu Ahmed to see his children again.

His family's sole survivor after an Israeli airstrike, Ahmed was sleeping near Gaza City in the early hours of Thursday after celebrating news of the truce when he heard a loud sound and was thrown into the air.

“Dust and screams surrounded me,” he said, adding that his wife and three of his children were killed, including a daughter whom he said was a doctor.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/...s-gaza-ceasefire-deal-agreed-hamas-rcna188104

Israel is hurrying to try to kill all the women and children it can before the ceasefire.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom