Biden SCOTUS nominee went beyond call of duty to defend terror suspects

The Purge

Platinum Member
Aug 16, 2018
17,881
7,856
400
Ketanji Brown Jackson's defense of Gitmo detainees and criticism of U.S. government likely to be spotlighted in confirmation process.

0:00 / 0:00 By Aaron Kliegman Updated: February 25, 2022 - 11:37pm Article Dig In President Biden's nominee for the Supreme Court represented suspected terrorists when she was a federal public defender, going well beyond a bare-bones defense to lambaste the U.S. government for some if its counterterrorism policies and broader approach to the War on Terror.

Biden on Friday nominated Ketanji Brown Jackson, currently a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, to replace retiring Justice Stephen Breyer on the Supreme Court.

Jackson's record will no doubt be heavily scrutinized in the coming days as the Senate prepares for its confirmation hearings. Perhaps no aspect of her past legal work will come under more scrutiny than her advocacy on behalf of prisoners detained at the Guantanamo Bay military prison as enemy combatants for their alleged role in terrorist activities.

During her time in the federal public defender's office, Jackson represented Guantanamo detainees who challenged their imprisonment in a federal court in Washington, D.C.

One of the most prominent cases involved Jackson representing Khiali-Gul, who the Defense Department said was a Taliban intelligence officer in charge of a terrorist cell planning to attack a U.S. base in Afghanistan in 2002. He may have also met with Osama bin Laden in November 2001, according to government documents.

The Defense Department assessed that if released Gul would immediately "seek out prior associates and reengage in hostilities and extremist support activities."

(Excerpt) Read more at

No matter what, a liberal will be appointed.
 
Ketanji Brown Jackson's defense of Gitmo detainees and criticism of U.S. government likely to be spotlighted in confirmation process.

0:00 / 0:00 By Aaron Kliegman Updated: February 25, 2022 - 11:37pm Article Dig In President Biden's nominee for the Supreme Court represented suspected terrorists when she was a federal public defender, going well beyond a bare-bones defense to lambaste the U.S. government for some if its counterterrorism policies and broader approach to the War on Terror.

Biden on Friday nominated Ketanji Brown Jackson, currently a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, to replace retiring Justice Stephen Breyer on the Supreme Court.

Jackson's record will no doubt be heavily scrutinized in the coming days as the Senate prepares for its confirmation hearings. Perhaps no aspect of her past legal work will come under more scrutiny than her advocacy on behalf of prisoners detained at the Guantanamo Bay military prison as enemy combatants for their alleged role in terrorist activities.

During her time in the federal public defender's office, Jackson represented Guantanamo detainees who challenged their imprisonment in a federal court in Washington, D.C.

One of the most prominent cases involved Jackson representing Khiali-Gul, who the Defense Department said was a Taliban intelligence officer in charge of a terrorist cell planning to attack a U.S. base in Afghanistan in 2002. He may have also met with Osama bin Laden in November 2001, according to government documents.

The Defense Department assessed that if released Gul would immediately "seek out prior associates and reengage in hostilities and extremist support activities."

(Excerpt) Read more at

No matter what, a liberal will be appointed.
I don't see anything here that would worry me in confirming her.
Weren't you conservatives barking for years about Guantanamo?
She was an advocate..that's kinda what a public defender does.
 
I don't see anything here that would worry me in confirming her.
Weren't you conservatives barking for years about Guantanamo?
She was an advocate..that's kinda what a public defender does.
So you are pro-racist and bigotry. So you are for committing a crime and racism, which is what Biden is doing by discriminating based on race
Biden is committing a crime and you are blind to it
 
So you are pro-racist and bigotry. So you are for committing a crime and racism, which is what Biden is doing by discriminating based on race
Biden is committing a crime and you are blind to it
What does any of your blather here have to do with her record?
You don't like her because she's black and Biden made a campaign promise to nominate one.
Not like he's the first President to make that kind of promise when they were a candidate. :)
Just sayin.
 
Ketanji Brown Jackson's defense of Gitmo detainees and criticism of U.S. government likely to be spotlighted in confirmation process.

0:00 / 0:00 By Aaron Kliegman Updated: February 25, 2022 - 11:37pm Article Dig In President Biden's nominee for the Supreme Court represented suspected terrorists when she was a federal public defender, going well beyond a bare-bones defense to lambaste the U.S. government for some if its counterterrorism policies and broader approach to the War on Terror.

Biden on Friday nominated Ketanji Brown Jackson, currently a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, to replace retiring Justice Stephen Breyer on the Supreme Court.

Jackson's record will no doubt be heavily scrutinized in the coming days as the Senate prepares for its confirmation hearings. Perhaps no aspect of her past legal work will come under more scrutiny than her advocacy on behalf of prisoners detained at the Guantanamo Bay military prison as enemy combatants for their alleged role in terrorist activities.

During her time in the federal public defender's office, Jackson represented Guantanamo detainees who challenged their imprisonment in a federal court in Washington, D.C.

One of the most prominent cases involved Jackson representing Khiali-Gul, who the Defense Department said was a Taliban intelligence officer in charge of a terrorist cell planning to attack a U.S. base in Afghanistan in 2002. He may have also met with Osama bin Laden in November 2001, according to government documents.

The Defense Department assessed that if released Gul would immediately "seek out prior associates and reengage in hostilities and extremist support activities."

(Excerpt) Read more at

No matter what, a liberal will be appointed.
When America Sleeps, the Sleeper Cells Awake

Which reminds me—aren't the Nazislami thrill-killers about due to pull off another 9/11?
 
The Terror issue is very controversial, even among libs.

I wonder how many Senators are really comfortable voting to confirm someone who might be considered soft on terror.
 
From a legal and Constitutional basis, GITMO detainees are a sticky conundrum. They are not CRIMINALS, they are held as POW's. They should not be granted trials in criminal court, because they are not being detained for what they have DONE (i.e., crimes), but because of what they ARE. And POW's are held until the cessation of hostilities, which in their case is unknowable.

They can legally be detained under international law pursuant to evidence that would not pass muster in a U.S. criminal court. It is normal for them to be detained based on hearsay, with no direct evidence.

It would be bad form to attack this nominee for doing her job aggressively under those circumstances. I don't think it will happen.
 
So you are pro-racist and bigotry. So you are for committing a crime and racism, which is what Biden is doing by discriminating based on race
Biden is committing a crime and you are blind to it
Trump discriminated based on gender.
So did Reagan.

You blind to it?
 
Then she should fit in with Kavanaugh
Why because some democrat women lied. One admitted she never met Kavanaugh. She just wanted to hurt him.

To be a Democrat is to be so evil as to belong in the 7th circle of hell.
 
Why because some democrat women lied. One admitted she never met Kavanaugh. She just wanted to hurt him.

To be a Democrat is to be so evil as to belong in the 7th circle of hell.
No more evil than what you are implying about her.
 
Trump discriminated based on gender.
So did Reagan.

You blind to it?
Wrong. No they did not. There is no proof of that. But we have undeniable proof that Biden is nominating based on skin color
 
Wrong. No they did not. There is no proof of that. But we have undeniable proof that Biden is nominating based on skin color
Both said they would nominate a woman, and did.

Silly double standards, and even sillier thinking a black woman can’t also be qualified.
 
I don't see anything here that would worry me in confirming her.
Weren't you conservatives barking for years about Guantanamo?
She was an advocate..that's kinda what a public defender does.
Supporting her means you support terrorism, ignoring the laws to legislate from the bench, and don't mind a judge so corrupt/inept that she is constantly overturned on the SC abusing and corrupting her office.
 
Both said they would nominate a woman, and did.

Silly double standards, and even sillier thinking a black woman can’t also be qualified.
REally? Then why didn't they find a black female judge who is qualified to nominate instead of this terror supporting idiot who ignores the laws to push a political agenda.

Biden--and whoever controls picked her hoping to hide her ineptnes and corruption behind the race card.
 

Forum List

Back
Top