Biden says he will resign if he has a fundamental disagreement with Kamala

Cool, it'll be fun to see the epic meltdown over President Harris. :D
It will be a replay of the epic meltdown over a President Trump

Clearly you prefer chaos to competency.

From someone on the looney left that has been promoting chaos for 4 fricken years....go figure.

Interesting - What chaos did I promote? :rolleyes-41:

That is interesting, you must have been napping for the last 4 years.

You support the Proud Boys and various other Deplorables for Trumpy Bear, and yet I do NOT support AntiFa. So which of us supports chaos?

Interesting - when did I support the Proud Boys? :rolleyes-41:

I'm not gonna scour your postings. Rest assured, your pals definitely support Proud Boys - And Kyle Rittenhouse - And the Boogaloo Bois - AND White Nationalism.

Yet you expect me to scour yours...dumbass.
 
Cool, it'll be fun to see the epic meltdown over President Harris. :D
It will be a replay of the epic meltdown over a President Trump

Clearly you prefer chaos to competency.

From someone on the looney left that has been promoting chaos for 4 fricken years....go figure.

Interesting - What chaos did I promote? :rolleyes-41:

That is interesting, you must have been napping for the last 4 years.

You support the Proud Boys and various other Deplorables for Trumpy Bear, and yet I do NOT support AntiFa. So which of us supports chaos?

Interesting - when did I support the Proud Boys? :rolleyes-41:

I'm not gonna scour your postings. Rest assured, your pals definitely support Proud Boys - And Kyle Rittenhouse - And the Boogaloo Bois - AND White Nationalism.
Rittenhouse is a hero, all the rioters need to be executed.
 
Amazing how ignorant people had to be to vote for this guy. Freudian slip much like the bit about the most extensive fraud organization. I am not sure he knows he isn't supposed to be saying this stuff in public...this was supposed to remain behind closed doors. If elected, Kamala will be president within 6 months. God help the US.

"Like I told Barack, if I reach something where there's a fundamental disagreement we have based on a moral principle, I'll develop some disease and say I have to resign."

Biden says he will ‘develop some disease’ and resign if disagreements with Harris arise
"conservativeinstitute.org" They wouldn't make anything up now, would they? :dunno:
I guess your preference of new reporting deemed it best you not hear what he said. Keeps you naive to reality. Must work well for you
The quote doesn't even sound plausible unless he was joking.
So you didnt hear it live or on tape.
Hmmm.....why is that? Did your media deem you not worthy of hearing it?
Curious...do you not want to hear an unedited version of it?
You can get one.
Instead you want to blame the few that reported it?
Sort of the norm nowadays.
So I was right, "as he “joked” about manufacturing a disease to blame his resignation on."
Maybe. But who jokes about resigning from the position of leader of the free world?
Was it a joke? I dont know. Was it wise to joke about it? You decide.

This is how the next four years will go, if Biden prevails: he says jaw-droppingly, mind-numbingly stupid things, and then the leftists scramble to tell us how and why it was really brilliant, while we all stare at them, wondering what kind of drug they're on.
 
Amazing how ignorant people had to be to vote for this guy. Freudian slip much like the bit about the most extensive fraud organization. I am not sure he knows he isn't supposed to be saying this stuff in public...this was supposed to remain behind closed doors. If elected, Kamala will be president within 6 months. God help the US.

"Like I told Barack, if I reach something where there's a fundamental disagreement we have based on a moral principle, I'll develop some disease and say I have to resign."

Biden says he will ‘develop some disease’ and resign if disagreements with Harris arise
I took him to mean that the #2 would have to resign, but, good luck with that Illegitimate Joe! She'll drop your ass faster than Epstein did in his cell.

Ultimately, it won't matter.

Why Trump’s America will live on because it has little to do with Trump.
In their current guise, Democrats today can only offer redistribution of wealth, which itself can come in two forms, each with inherent problems. A traditional socialist approach would hardly be in the interest of the Democratic funders or the non-profit establishment, given it would involve siphoning off the wealth of people like Jeff Bezos, who expended much of his media power, through the Washington Post, opposing Bernie Sanders’ presidential bid. Yet the progressive left continues to push this agenda, notably in big urban centres, a continuing challenge to more oligarch-friendly liberals.
Middle/Working Class Serfdom
The other alternative would be to turn the middle and working class into future serfs – that is, people increasingly dependent on what Marx called ‘the proletarian alms bag’ (1). This ‘oligarchal socialism’ – backed by many tech oligarchs – would transfer funds, likely from the remaining middle class, to fund a ‘guaranteed annual income’ to keep hoi polloi in subsidised apartments, spending their time in low-wage gig jobs, while they play video games, smoke pot, drink and water their houseplants. It is an approach that allows the oligarchs to continue accumulating the wealth and power they see as their due, while keeping the peasants separate from their pitchforks.
We aren't trading our Liberty for that.
These unattractive alternatives could provide enormous opportunities for Republicans, or more traditional Democrats, if they could overcome the opposition of ‘market fundamentalists’. On the right, as the American Prospect has demonstrated, many conservative think-tanks are financed by Google and other oligopolists. The future could belong not to Trump but to more coherent Republicans like Oren Cass and his American Compass group, who reject ‘let the market rip’ fundamentalism and openly favour working-class interests in terms of healthcare, education, housing, anti-trust policy and energy.
"Kinder Gentler" Communism
Americans do not want to be either Marxist or oligarchic wards. They generally desire to become more self-sufficient and successful. The attempt to implement a pilot guaranteed-incomes programme in Modesto, California, a hardscrabble Valley town of 300,000, was recently rescinded by a primarily minority electorate, who replaced a progressive Democratic with a black Republican preacher. Like most Americans, most minorities and working-class people still believe in the ‘dream’ even if they believe that it is more difficult to achieve.
It's only more difficult because of the Leftwing Overlords And Crony Capitalists that rob the Working/Middle Class of opportunity
Until that quintessentially American spark is squelched entirely, the disruptive process brought on by Trump will not go away, but simply evolve and even expand. The question will be whether a more sober, less nativist, and focused populism will emerge from the wreckage or be replaced by something more troubling.
Trump’s America will live on, because Trump’s greatest achievement has been exposing the rot and corruption of our ruling class.

Illegitimate Joe and The Ho will play their Game of Thrones and neither politically survives into 2025.
 
Amazing how ignorant people had to be to vote for this guy. Freudian slip much like the bit about the most extensive fraud organization. I am not sure he knows he isn't supposed to be saying this stuff in public...this was supposed to remain behind closed doors. If elected, Kamala will be president within 6 months. God help the US.

"Like I told Barack, if I reach something where there's a fundamental disagreement we have based on a moral principle, I'll develop some disease and say I have to resign."

Biden says he will ‘develop some disease’ and resign if disagreements with Harris arise
I am going to follow this just to see who is stu[id enough to believe that he say such a thing

He did say it. The audio is out there for you to hear it, if you want to bother learning a fact, rather than just asserting what you want to be the facts.
 
Amazing how ignorant people had to be to vote for this guy. Freudian slip much like the bit about the most extensive fraud organization. I am not sure he knows he isn't supposed to be saying this stuff in public...this was supposed to remain behind closed doors. If elected, Kamala will be president within 6 months. God help the US.

"Like I told Barack, if I reach something where there's a fundamental disagreement we have based on a moral principle, I'll develop some disease and say I have to resign."

Biden says he will ‘develop some disease’ and resign if disagreements with Harris arise
"conservativeinstitute.org" They wouldn't make anything up now, would they? :dunno:
I guess your preference of new reporting deemed it best you not hear what he said. Keeps you naive to reality. Must work well for you
The quote doesn't even sound plausible unless he was joking.
So you didnt hear it live or on tape.
Hmmm.....why is that? Did your media deem you not worthy of hearing it?
Curious...do you not want to hear an unedited version of it?
You can get one.
Instead you want to blame the few that reported it?
Sort of the norm nowadays.
So I was right, "as he “joked” about manufacturing a disease to blame his resignation on."
Maybe. But who jokes about resigning from the position of leader of the free world?
Was it a joke? I dont know. Was it wise to joke about it? You decide.

This is how the next four years will go, if Biden prevails: he says jaw-droppingly, mind-numbingly stupid things, and then the leftists scramble to tell us how and why it was really brilliant, while we all stare at them, wondering what kind of drug they're on.
Please just stop.

You said that after four years of you folks saying

"What Trump ACTUALLY meant was..."

Get bent
 
More proof that Biden is unfit for the office.

Of course Biden said that Obama. Biden wasn't the President.

As President, the proper course of action would be to demand Harris' resignation, and nothing less...
More proof that you BDS'ers are ASSHOLES who will swallow any SHIT fed to you SUCKKKERS!!!

Do you honestly believe that, if the President and the Vice President have a very basic, philosophical disagreement, that Biden should step down??

Are you mentally retarded??
Biden NEVER said HE would step down, he said just like with Obama the VP steps down!!!!
But lying scum like you knew that already!!!

Boy are you going to be in for a surprise. If elected, Biden will not be in office long. They will find some excuse, albeit one that tricks you fools that voted for him into thinking it wasn’t planned all along, to get him out of office. Even while in office, he will not make any of the decisions. That will be left-wing nut Kamala.
BULLSHIT!
 
this was the plan all along, get senile Joe elected by fraudulent methods, then declare him incompetent under the 25th amendment, kick him out and put the SFO ho in the whitehouse, if you want to see the USA destroyed let that play out. If you want to see a revolution or a secession movement let that play out.

the USA is in grave danger, do not let the socialists take over.
BULLSHIT!
 
Amazing how ignorant people had to be to vote for this guy. Freudian slip much like the bit about the most extensive fraud organization. I am not sure he knows he isn't supposed to be saying this stuff in public...this was supposed to remain behind closed doors. If elected, Kamala will be president within 6 months. God help the US.

"Like I told Barack, if I reach something where there's a fundamental disagreement we have based on a moral principle, I'll develop some disease and say I have to resign."

Biden says he will ‘develop some disease’ and resign if disagreements with Harris arise
"conservativeinstitute.org" They wouldn't make anything up now, would they? :dunno:
I guess your preference of new reporting deemed it best you not hear what he said. Keeps you naive to reality. Must work well for you
The quote doesn't even sound plausible unless he was joking.
So you didnt hear it live or on tape.
Hmmm.....why is that? Did your media deem you not worthy of hearing it?
Curious...do you not want to hear an unedited version of it?
You can get one.
Instead you want to blame the few that reported it?
Sort of the norm nowadays.
So I was right, "as he “joked” about manufacturing a disease to blame his resignation on."
Maybe. But who jokes about resigning from the position of leader of the free world?
Was it a joke? I dont know. Was it wise to joke about it? You decide.

This is how the next four years will go, if Biden prevails: he says jaw-droppingly, mind-numbingly stupid things, and then the leftists scramble to tell us how and why it was really brilliant, while we all stare at them, wondering what kind of drug they're on.
Hopefully it's better drugs than you all have been on for the past 4 years.
 
Cool, it'll be fun to see the epic meltdown over President Harris. :D
Hope you don't have money. She wants everyone to be equal. No rich people, except of her. Of course.
LIAR!
She said it herself, its not fair if a child's father has the money to send their child to college. When there is a parent that cannot. So she wants to even the playing field. She said it, you really don't know what you voted for? Hatred is a deceiver, you idiot. Lol
 
Quid Pro Joe just admitted he is farther left than Commie Bernie.
 
Amazing how ignorant people had to be to vote for this guy. Freudian slip much like the bit about the most extensive fraud organization. I am not sure he knows he isn't supposed to be saying this stuff in public...this was supposed to remain behind closed doors. If elected, Kamala will be president within 6 months. God help the US.

"Like I told Barack, if I reach something where there's a fundamental disagreement we have based on a moral principle, I'll develop some disease and say I have to resign."

Biden says he will ‘develop some disease’ and resign if disagreements with Harris arise
I took him to mean that the #2 would have to resign, but, good luck with that Illegitimate Joe! She'll drop your ass faster than Epstein did in his cell.

Ultimately, it won't matter.

Why Trump’s America will live on because it has little to do with Trump.
In their current guise, Democrats today can only offer redistribution of wealth, which itself can come in two forms, each with inherent problems. A traditional socialist approach would hardly be in the interest of the Democratic funders or the non-profit establishment, given it would involve siphoning off the wealth of people like Jeff Bezos, who expended much of his media power, through the Washington Post, opposing Bernie Sanders’ presidential bid. Yet the progressive left continues to push this agenda, notably in big urban centres, a continuing challenge to more oligarch-friendly liberals.
Middle/Working Class Serfdom
The other alternative would be to turn the middle and working class into future serfs – that is, people increasingly dependent on what Marx called ‘the proletarian alms bag’ (1). This ‘oligarchal socialism’ – backed by many tech oligarchs – would transfer funds, likely from the remaining middle class, to fund a ‘guaranteed annual income’ to keep hoi polloi in subsidised apartments, spending their time in low-wage gig jobs, while they play video games, smoke pot, drink and water their houseplants. It is an approach that allows the oligarchs to continue accumulating the wealth and power they see as their due, while keeping the peasants separate from their pitchforks.
We aren't trading our Liberty for that.
These unattractive alternatives could provide enormous opportunities for Republicans, or more traditional Democrats, if they could overcome the opposition of ‘market fundamentalists’. On the right, as the American Prospect has demonstrated, many conservative think-tanks are financed by Google and other oligopolists. The future could belong not to Trump but to more coherent Republicans like Oren Cass and his American Compass group, who reject ‘let the market rip’ fundamentalism and openly favour working-class interests in terms of healthcare, education, housing, anti-trust policy and energy.
"Kinder Gentler" Communism
Americans do not want to be either Marxist or oligarchic wards. They generally desire to become more self-sufficient and successful. The attempt to implement a pilot guaranteed-incomes programme in Modesto, California, a hardscrabble Valley town of 300,000, was recently rescinded by a primarily minority electorate, who replaced a progressive Democratic with a black Republican preacher. Like most Americans, most minorities and working-class people still believe in the ‘dream’ even if they believe that it is more difficult to achieve.
It's only more difficult because of the Leftwing Overlords And Crony Capitalists that rob the Working/Middle Class of opportunity
Until that quintessentially American spark is squelched entirely, the disruptive process brought on by Trump will not go away, but simply evolve and even expand. The question will be whether a more sober, less nativist, and focused populism will emerge from the wreckage or be replaced by something more troubling.
Trump’s America will live on, because Trump’s greatest achievement has been exposing the rot and corruption of our ruling class.

Illegitimate Joe and The Ho will play their Game of Thrones and neither politically survives into 2025.
They know they are protected. The Swamp is deep. On their own they would be cleaning toilets. We are still allowed to have different vires in a continuing reduced role. It is incredible that we have a man with dementia and a woman who should be slinging hash at a greasy spoon in power.
 
Amazing how ignorant people had to be to vote for this guy. Freudian slip much like the bit about the most extensive fraud organization. I am not sure he knows he isn't supposed to be saying this stuff in public...this was supposed to remain behind closed doors. If elected, Kamala will be president within 6 months. God help the US.

"Like I told Barack, if I reach something where there's a fundamental disagreement we have based on a moral principle, I'll develop some disease and say I have to resign."

Biden says he will ‘develop some disease’ and resign if disagreements with Harris arise
I took him to mean that the #2 would have to resign, but, good luck with that Illegitimate Joe! She'll drop your ass faster than Epstein did in his cell.

Ultimately, it won't matter.

Why Trump’s America will live on because it has little to do with Trump.
In their current guise, Democrats today can only offer redistribution of wealth, which itself can come in two forms, each with inherent problems. A traditional socialist approach would hardly be in the interest of the Democratic funders or the non-profit establishment, given it would involve siphoning off the wealth of people like Jeff Bezos, who expended much of his media power, through the Washington Post, opposing Bernie Sanders’ presidential bid. Yet the progressive left continues to push this agenda, notably in big urban centres, a continuing challenge to more oligarch-friendly liberals.
Middle/Working Class Serfdom
The other alternative would be to turn the middle and working class into future serfs – that is, people increasingly dependent on what Marx called ‘the proletarian alms bag’ (1). This ‘oligarchal socialism’ – backed by many tech oligarchs – would transfer funds, likely from the remaining middle class, to fund a ‘guaranteed annual income’ to keep hoi polloi in subsidised apartments, spending their time in low-wage gig jobs, while they play video games, smoke pot, drink and water their houseplants. It is an approach that allows the oligarchs to continue accumulating the wealth and power they see as their due, while keeping the peasants separate from their pitchforks.
We aren't trading our Liberty for that.
These unattractive alternatives could provide enormous opportunities for Republicans, or more traditional Democrats, if they could overcome the opposition of ‘market fundamentalists’. On the right, as the American Prospect has demonstrated, many conservative think-tanks are financed by Google and other oligopolists. The future could belong not to Trump but to more coherent Republicans like Oren Cass and his American Compass group, who reject ‘let the market rip’ fundamentalism and openly favour working-class interests in terms of healthcare, education, housing, anti-trust policy and energy.
"Kinder Gentler" Communism
Americans do not want to be either Marxist or oligarchic wards. They generally desire to become more self-sufficient and successful. The attempt to implement a pilot guaranteed-incomes programme in Modesto, California, a hardscrabble Valley town of 300,000, was recently rescinded by a primarily minority electorate, who replaced a progressive Democratic with a black Republican preacher. Like most Americans, most minorities and working-class people still believe in the ‘dream’ even if they believe that it is more difficult to achieve.
It's only more difficult because of the Leftwing Overlords And Crony Capitalists that rob the Working/Middle Class of opportunity
Until that quintessentially American spark is squelched entirely, the disruptive process brought on by Trump will not go away, but simply evolve and even expand. The question will be whether a more sober, less nativist, and focused populism will emerge from the wreckage or be replaced by something more troubling.
Trump’s America will live on, because Trump’s greatest achievement has been exposing the rot and corruption of our ruling class.

Illegitimate Joe and The Ho will play their Game of Thrones and neither politically survives into 2025.
They know they are protected. The Swamp is deep. On their own they would be cleaning toilets. We are still allowed to have different vires in a continuing reduced role. It is incredible that we have a man with dementia and a woman who should be slinging hash at a greasy spoon in power.
Yes, but, in a fiendishly clever move, with Durham in the Special Counsel role continuing to investigate Biden's corrupt attack on the Trump transition team, and it will only be a matter of time before the Biden Crime Family global foreign bribery cabal is pulled into the investigation.

1607191244541.png

Benjamin "Witless" Wittes has been one of the louder anti-Trump voices in the country over the past few years. He spent a lot of time (with his toy cannon) promoting the Russia collusion story. In 2018 he advocated “mindlessly and mechanically” voting against GOP nominees in order to save the GOP from itself.

Today, Witless Wittes examines AG Barr’s appointment of John Durham as special counsel. Titled “How do you solve a problem like John Durham?” the piece examines the details of Barr’s appointment and what the Illegitimate Joe administration might to do to undo it. In the process of examining the appointment, Wittes concedes that Barr’s move was done in such a way that the incoming AG, which certainly will not be Sunk Sally Yates, will not be able to do anything about it.

The more I study what Attorney General Bill Barr did in his secret October order naming the Connecticut U.S. attorney as a special counsel, the more devilishly clever it seems—and the bigger the pickle it creates for Barr’s successor. This, presumably, is Barr’s intention. Untangling this knot is going to take no small amount of diplomacy, lawyering and finesse. And a false move in any of several directions could create a real mess.​

NARRATOR'S VOICE: It will not be undone.

Witless Wittes notes that it was right for Barr to appoint Durham in secret rather than make the appointment public just before the election. The appointment prevents the incoming illegitimate Biden administration from sweeping Durham aside:
The move saddles Biden with a special counsel investigation. As a U.S. attorney, Durham would be dismissed in the normal course of the change of administration, as a special counsel he is protected from removal by regulations and guaranteed day-to-day independence.
Barr’s appointment gave Durham wide latitude in what he can investigate: Essentially anything connected to the Russian investigation. And he required that at the end of his investigation Durham produce a report:
The regulations themselves do not do this. They require only a confidential report from the special counsel to the attorney general explaining the special counsel’s prosecution and non-prosecution decisions. But Barr’s order goes a step further, requiring that: “In addition to the confidential report required by 28 C.F.R. § 600.8(c), the Special Counsel, to the maximum extent possible and consistent with the law and the policies and practices of the Department of Justice, shall submit to the Attorney General a final report, and such interim reports as he deems appropriate, in a form that will permit public dissemination.
If illegitimate Biden’s AG refused to release this report it would only raise questions and investigations about why. By mandating the writing of a report Barr has guaranteed that the outcome will become public. Clever.

Barr’s appointment of Durham closely mirrors the appointment of Dirty Bob Mueller. Here Witless Wittes relies on a piece by Josh Blackman:
Barr and Rosenstein, respectively, appointed Durham and Mueller pursuant to the same three statutes: 28 U.S.C § 509, § 510, and § 515. The third statute is the most important for present purposes. Section 515 empowers the attorney general to authorize a “special assistant”—though not a “special counsel”—to conduct “any kind of legal proceeding, civil or criminal, including grand jury proceedings.” Both the Durham and Mueller appointments contain the same, critical sentence: “If the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters.” This provision will allow Durham to bring federal prosecutions during the Biden presidency.
Witless Wittes says the political impact of this detail is that it will be very difficult for a future AG to undo the appointment:
This careful tracking of the Mueller appointment seems designed to make it awkward for a Democratic attorney general to come in and remove Durham or curtail his investigation. After all, Democrats, and many Republicans too, drew a firm line in insisting that Mueller not be fired and be allowed to complete his work. They also took a hard line in insisting that the special counsel regulations on the independence of the special counsel be respected. By setting this up as a direct legal parallel to the Mueller investigation, Barr puts those suspicious of the Durham investigation and wanting to curtail it in the position of having to argue, all of a sudden, that it’s actually okay to fire a special prosecutor or to figure out ways around the special counsel rules.
In other words, Barr has created a landmine for Biden who would trigger “Saturday Night Massacre” parallels if he has Durham removed. All of the people on the left who would argue in favor of Durham’s removal will have been on the record against removing Mueller. Witless Wittes asks us to imagine where this leaves an AG under Illegitimate Biden:
Curtail the Durham investigation and Republican senators will cry foul and claim the attorney general has betrayed a commitment made at his or her confirmation in order to shut down an investigation of FBI misconduct targeting Republicans. Perhaps more important, such a move would also set a precedent that firing special prosecutors is okay. This is precedent that is sure to be cited, exploited and abused in the future.
A thorough exacting and deeply detailed investigation:
Conversely, just let Durham do his thing, and the new attorney general runs a different risk: of letting a wide-ranging investigation of the Russia investigation run riot over the new administration for as long as Durham wants and with a mandate to issue a public report—including, potentially, on the non-criminal matters that were the subject of the original Durham review—at a time of the special counsel’s choosing.
Witless Wittes is assuming for the sake of argument that the media would hold Democrats to the same standard as Republicans, but of course that’s not how things really work in The Swamp. We saw that when all of the women’s groups who came out against Judge Kavanaugh suddenly explained that “Believe women!” didn’t mean believing all women. But he’s right that if Democrats were held to the same standards this would present a real problem.

Witless Wittes goes on to argue that the next AG can simply rescind AG Barr’s order and thereby do away with Durham’s Special Counsel status. This no different that firing Durham:
The attorney general might hesitate to take this step because of external and internal pressures. To the general public, after all, the rescission of Barr’s order would be indistinguishable from firing the special counsel. And given the fact that Barr never removed Mueller from his position as special counsel, there will likely be public pressure to allow Durham to complete his task.
I’m sure the left will try to reverse course on Durham (and argue he should be fired) and I’m sure the media will mostly let them get away with it. But it would still be a scandal.

Illegitimate Biden and his future AG are trapped but not by anything AG Barr did. They are trapped in a box Democrats built over years of investigations of Russian collusion and endless harping about the importance of observing norms. They can suddenly abandon all of that now that it’s no longer convenient but doing so would not only reveal their deep hypocrisy it would set a powerful precedent for the future.

Ultimately it doesn't matter if it's Illegitimate Joe or The Ho, they both go down in 2024.
 
I took it to mean Biden said if they disagree on morals then he'll get a disease and blow away. Oh wait, that is what he said.
 
I took it to mean Biden said if they disagree on morals then he'll get a disease and blow away. Oh wait, that is what he said.
I doubt it. I think it's much more likely that he meant that is #2 gets sideways with #1 that #2 gracefully bows out, and then he used his agreement with Obama, when he was #2 to explain his expectations of his #2, Kamala.
 
I took it to mean Biden said if they disagree on morals then he'll get a disease and blow away. Oh wait, that is what he said.
I doubt it. I think it's much more likely that he meant that is #2 gets sideways with #1 that #2 gracefully bows out, and then he used his agreement with Obama, when he was #2 to explain his expectations of his #2, Kamala.

So you're saying what Biden really meant was if they have a disagreement on morals then Kamala will get a disease and blow away. Interesting.

I wonder when that's happened before, O'bummer included?
 

Forum List

Back
Top