Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 82,399
- 41,251
- 2,615
Can you admit that Trump lied repeatedly?I have said it many times, the media sees Trump as their enemy. Will you name those couple of Biden lies?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you admit that Trump lied repeatedly?I have said it many times, the media sees Trump as their enemy. Will you name those couple of Biden lies?
Here is what tickles me. Democrats post here and lie all day long. And they love lying. Suddenly they want me to worry about trump?Can you admit that Trump lied repeatedly?
What exactly do you despise? Placing US interests over those of other nations? Reducing the tax burden on all earners? Restoring security along our borders? Avoiding involvement in foreign wars?If ONLY you could post a quote of me "Loving Democrats"
I despise what trump is doing, a lying con man, that has convinced you he wants to "Help You".
That ^^^^ is not me loving (D), but you are correct in the sense that I despise Trump and ALL things he stands for.
Now, find that quote of me "Loving Democrats" or consider yourself a low-life coward.
I keep going to stores for food and supplies and the costs keep going up. And every time I think of Joe and the Progs. They knew better. They told us. If alcohol keeps increasing, we will all be bootlegging.You fail with your comparisons, I pay less than $10 a month for my insulin,
We can prove Biden lied like a rug.Can you admit that Trump lied repeatedly?
If ONLY this was true across the board.Reducing the tax burden on all earners?
And I've said that.......We can prove Biden lied like a rug.
Congress enacted an income tax in October 1913 as part of the Revenue Act of 1913, levying a 1% tax on net personal incomes above $3,000, with a 6% surtax on incomes above $500,000. By 1918, the top rate of the income tax was increased to 77% (on income over $1,000,000, equivalent of $16,717,815 in 2018 dollars).If ONLY this was true across the board.
Just like consumer tax.
It should be proportional across the board.
A: Makes $50,000, pays $5,000 in FIT
B: Makes $200,000, pays $20,000 in FIT
C: Makes $1,000,000, pays $100,000 in FIT
D: Makes $100,000,000, pays $10,000,000 in FIT
Tell us why you Like or Dislike this Tax Plan.
Let's do it fairly. I will ask the posters who is correct.And I've said that.......
My direct quote was..... "Trump Lies, Biden Lies"
You keep claiming that this quote is.....Me attacking (R) and defending (D).
I said they BOTH lie.
Now, where is my quote "Defending Democrats"
Find it, post it.
He led the Congress to reduce the tax burden on all taxpayers. I don’t care if wealthy people also benefit from that.If ONLY this was true across the board.
Just like consumer tax.
It should be proportional across the board.
A: Makes $50,000, pays $5,000 in FIT
B: Makes $200,000, pays $20,000 in FIT
C: Makes $1,000,000, pays $100,000 in FIT
D: Makes $100,000,000, pays $10,000,000 in FIT
Tell us why you Like or Dislike this Tax Plan.
He led the Congress to reduce the tax burden on all taxpayers. I don’t care if wealthy people also benefit from that.
The Wealthy had their tax burden cut more than the average worker, but YES, they still paid, but NOT as much as their 'proportional share' should have been.He led the Congress to reduce the tax burden on all taxpayers. I don’t care if wealthy people also benefit from that.
Geez, give me a minute, I gotta make lunch on the Griddle.I noticed you failed to respond to the rest of my comment. That’s quite cowardly.
Yes, trump mostly.Let's do it fairly. I will ask the posters who is correct.
Posters, judge me and Winco. Does Winco constantly attack Republicans?
Wealthy people of course receive more in a dollar benefit. They also shoulder a far greater burden than the middle and working classes. The top 20% of earners pay more than 80% of the federal income tax. The bottom 50% pays something like 6%. 47% pay no federal income tax.The Wealthy had their tax burden cut more than the average worker, but YES, they still paid, but NOT as much as their 'proportional share' should have been.
There is NO Fairness to a "Billionaire" paying $750 in FIT.
That's not smart, that's cheating the burden.
Geez, give me a minute, I gotta make lunch on the Griddle.
Consumer tax (sales tax) should be uniform across the board. It should have nothing to do with your income.If ONLY this was true across the board.
Just like consumer tax.
It should be proportional across the board...
The new tariffs Trump is proposing will cost each of us thousands, which is not proportional to income.He led the Congress to reduce the tax burden on all taxpayers. I don’t care if wealthy people also benefit from that.
This is the FLAWED argument RWers constantly claim as proof.They also shoulder a far greater burden than the middle and working classes. The top 20% of earners pay more than 80% of the federal income tax.
A: Makes $50,000, pays $5,000 in FIT
B: Makes $200,000, pays $20,000 in FIT
C: Makes $1,000,000, pays $100,000 in FIT
D: Makes $100,000,000, pays $10,000,000 in FIT
How are facts flawed? Is it proportional to have 1% of the earned paying 40% of the federal income tax and 20% paying 80%?This is the FLAWED argument RWers constantly claim as proof.
Of course they pay more, they MAKE more.
Just keep it in proportion like I stated earlier.
FACT not guesses you are doing!You unwittingly conflated the two forms of interest by suggesting that interest paid to me on my savings had an inflationary impact on the food costs of others. People don't take out bank loans to buy food, they use their credit cards, which usually carry a high interest rate. Higher savings rates don't add to inflation, they just keep up with it. If people are buying food on credit they are adding greatly to the cost of their food. "Out of the frying pan, into the fire."
Additionally, the current increase in interest rates is intended to reduce inflation.