Biden is giving the 2nd highest civilian award to the leaders of the Jan. 6 congressional committee

[Jroc]

For Trump, the committee concluded there is enough evidence to convict, and therefore recommend the Department of Justice to make the following criminal charges:

• Obstruction of an official proceeding. The “proceeding” being the Jan. 6 meeting of Congress itself.
• Conspiracy to defraud the United States. The committee argued this happened in multiple ways, including Trump’s lies about the 2020 election, then-Vice President Pence’s role in certification, among other issues.
• Conspiracy to knowingly make a false statement. The committee said Trump broke this statute by participating in a plot to submit fake slates of electors.
• Assisting, aiding or comforting an insurrection. The committee believes Trump incited the U.S. Capitol attack, but notes he was impeached on that charge already. The report summary specifically concludes there is enough evidence to convict, and, therefore, charge him with “assisting, aiding or comforting” the insurrection. The focus here is on his actions as the attack unfolded — and his lack of action in not stopping it.

This is historic stuff.

So which part of that wasn't true?

 

[Jroc]

So Congress was attacked and you are saying there should not have been a committee to get at what happened and why?

There was no legitimate committee that's the problem

 

[AntonToo]

There was no legitimate committee that's the problem

Sir, who shit that nonsense into your head?

Why in the world do you think it wasn't legitimate?

 

[Hollie]

For Trump, the committee concluded there is enough evidence to convict, and therefore recommend the Department of Justice to make the following criminal charges:

• Obstruction of an official proceeding. The “proceeding” being the Jan. 6 meeting of Congress itself.
• Conspiracy to defraud the United States. The committee argued this happened in multiple ways, including Trump’s lies about the 2020 election, then-Vice President Pence’s role in certification, among other issues.
• Conspiracy to knowingly make a false statement. The committee said Trump broke this statute by participating in a plot to submit fake slates of electors.
• Assisting, aiding or comforting an insurrection. The committee believes Trump incited the U.S. Capitol attack, but notes he was impeached on that charge already. The report summary specifically concludes there is enough evidence to convict, and, therefore, charge him with “assisting, aiding or comforting” the insurrection. The focus here is on his actions as the attack unfolded — and his lack of action in not stopping it.

This is historic stuff.

So which part of that wasn't true?

A partisan " committee" that included among tbe most partisan democrats who predictably pressed the silly "insurrection" narrative.

The above is certainly true.

 

[berg80]

Do you actually want to address Turley's grievance?

 

[shockedcanadian]

The award for Cheney is apparently because she put country over Party. It is a bit of a misnomer because she isn't really in the same Party as Trump,.at least not in the same faction. It would.be akin to Pelosi investigating Bernie or AOC if they were well ahead in the Primary polls. Regardless, if this award did lead to people choosing their nation over politics it would be a positive outcome but I don't think very many if any are going to investigate their Party simply due to Cheneys decision.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

What about the gop platform has been about communist values?

All of it.

 

[AntonToo]

1. They don't say it's not legitimate.

2. Discussions about committee selections IS NOT A REFUTE OF THE FINDINGS.

 

[berg80]

There was no legitimate committee that's the problem

Try thinking for yourself for a moment. When the facts are against him what does trump always do? He attacks the people investigating him in order to try to de-legitimize the results of the investigation.

Recent history is replete with examples. As in the credibility of every investigator has been attacked by trump as a way to obfuscate the evidence they revealed.

 

[struth]

WTF QNUT?

I've posted then time after time.

www.yahoo.com · news · trump-praises-chineseTrump praises Chinese president extending tenure 'for life'​

Mar 4, 2018 · During the remarks, Trump praised Xi as "a great gentleman" and added: "He's the most powerful (Chinese) president in a hundred years." Trump said Xi had treated him..............

nextshark.com · donald-trump-praise-xi-joe-roganTrump praises Xi’s ‘iron fist’ rule of China - NextShark​

Oct 29, 2024 · What he said: Trump praised Xi for his autocratic style of governance in China.. “He controls 1.4 billion people with an iron fist. I mean, he’s a brilliant guy, whether you like it or not ...

So how is saying nice things adapting a communist platform?

 

[Jroc]

1. They don't say it's not legitimate.

2. Discussions about committee selections IS NOT A REFUTE OF THE FINDINGS.

The all Trump hate committee had all the time had all Trump hate findings of course... the whole thing was b*******

 

[struth]

All of it.

So you continue to display your are stupid

 

[AntonToo]

A partisan " committee"

Liz Cheney - Republican.
Adam Kinzinger - Republican.

Both members of that committee, making it bi-partisan.

 

[Jroc]

Try thinking for yourself for a moment. When the facts are against him what does trump always do? He attacks the people investigating him in order to try to de-legitimize the results of the investigation.

Recent history is replete with examples. As in the credibility of every investigator has been attacked by trump as a way to obfuscate the evidence they revealed.

 

[berg80]

This stuff is really very simple. Why did McCarthy refuse to fill the seats on the committee with Repubs after appointing the ones he chose for the purpose of sabotaging its work? Knowing Pelosi would reject them.

So he could claim the committee wasn't legitimate. See a pattern here?

 

[struth]

Liz Cheney - Republican.
Adam Kinzinger - Republican.

Both members of that committee, making it bi-partisan.

They left the gop.

They got in bed with the demafasict and engaged in criminal activity to take part in a political prosecution of harris and xiden’s political rival

 

[AntonToo]

Do you actually have your own words for your own thoughts?

Or are you afraid they are too weak to stand up to basic scrutiny?

 

[struth]

This stuff is really very simple. Why did McCarthy refuse to fill the seats on the committee with Repubs after appointing the ones he chose for the purpose of sabotaging its work? Knowing Pelosi would reject them.

So he could claim the committee wasn't legitimate. See a pattern here?

Why did Nancy reject them? See the problem? She didn’t want a fair and balanced committee. She wanted a political prosecution and got peoples like liz who was willing to engaged in witness tampering for their corrupt cause

 

[berg80]

I'm familiar with Turley shilling for Repubs. It's disingenuous, factually incorrect, and boils down to an ineffectual attempt to cast aspersions on the evidence the committee compiled.

 

[AntonToo]

They left the gop.

No dummy, GOP left them because GOP is now a Trump cult who will eject anyone who dares speak the truth about what he does.

It's not that Democrats didn't want Republicans on the J6 committee, it's that Republicans didn't want to be on it because getting to the facts of what happened and finding that Trump did this country wrong means sacrificing your political future in GOP.

That is exactly why Republicans that set aside their political ambitions to serve this country deserved the recognition that this thread is about.