link to report ā¦also the gop doesnāt run the senate
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
link to report ā¦also the gop doesnāt run the senate
hahah the OIG is not a prosecutorIt's the OIG and a special counsel and a prosecutor, and ...
your lost playing like you know things.
another KEyboard PhD
post where it was claimed. ha, ha, ha back at you. Turn in your keyboard diplomahaha sure sure
that's the point. Who appoints a Special Counsel? Is a SC a prosecutor?hahah the OIG is not a prosecutor
you link in post 61post where it was claimed. ha, ha, ha back at you. Turn in your keyboard diploma
yes a special prosecorr is a prosecutor. They are appointed by the DOJ and yes by stature once appointed have some protection but can still be firedā¦as they are still part of rhe executivethat's the point. Who appoints a Special Counsel? Is a SC a prosecutor?
I expect no rational reply
goodbye
They haven't jumped on a GOP smear campaign with no credible evidence of crimes?The MSM have done their best to hide and sweep this story under the rug but in my humble opinion it's too big and will come out in a big way.
yes a special prosecorr is a prosecutor. They are appointed by the DOJ and yes by stature once appointed have some protection but can still be firedā¦as they are still part of rhe executive
the dems changed rhe law after ken star giving them less independence from the DOJ
yeah and? what part of that donāt you understand?Special prosecutor
Primary tabs
[ A special prosecutor is a prosecutor who is independent of an office that would normally exercise jurisdiction in a criminal investigationāto avoid potential conflicts of interest or to facilitate subject matter area expertise. At the federal level, under 28 CFR § 600.1, a special prosecutor is referred to as a āspecial counsel,ā and may be appointed by the attorney general to criminally investigate an individual or matter in cases where a Justice Department investigation would present a conflict of interest, or in other āextraordinary circumstances.ā Under Supreme Court precedent in Morrison v. Olson, Congress may also appoint a special counsel through the passage of legislation. Notable special counsels in U.S. history include Ken Starr of the Clinton Whitewater investigation and Lawrence Walsh of the Iran-Contra Affair. ]
![]()
special prosecutor
www.law.cornell.edu
he pretends that his brain isnt jelloAre you able to articulate an actual crime that you're accusing Biden of....backed with evidence?
Eric Holder announced to the world he was Barry Husseinās āWingmanā simp.Actually, they do not work for the President, in the senes that they are not his personal legal firm. That is where Trump erred.
try educating yourself, with info beyond a Junior High School Civics Class homework assignment
![]()
Independence and Accountability at the Department of Justice
Over the weekend some conservative commentators pushed back on my tweet-claim that President Trump has āthreaten[ed] DOJ/FBI over and over in gross violation of independence norms.ā The Justice Department and its component the FBI āarenāt independent, nor should they be,ā argued Sean Davis of...www.lawfareblog.com
āI know the Republicans said that the smoking gun were these financial records that you were able to subpoena and got your hands on,ā Doocy said. āThey show that some of the presidentās relatives were paid more than $10 million from foreign sources between 2015 and 2017. And your party, the Republican investigators, say that thatās proof of influence peddling by Hunter and James. But thatās just your suggestion. You donāt actually have any facts to that point. You have got some circumstantial evidence. And the other thing is of all those names, the one person who didnāt profit is⦠thereās no evidence that Joe Biden did anything illegally.āyeah and? what part of that donāt you understand?
Euphemistically, yes.Eric Holder announced to the world he was Barry Husseinās āWingmanā simp.
yes itās just circumstisnal evidence at this point. people can be convicted on that alone but donāt worry the probe goes onāI know the Republicans said that the smoking gun were these financial records that you were able to subpoena and got your hands on,ā Doocy said. āThey show that some of the presidentās relatives were paid more than $10 million from foreign sources between 2015 and 2017. And your party, the Republican investigators, say that thatās proof of influence peddling by Hunter and James. But thatās just your suggestion. You donāt actually have any facts to that point. You have got some circumstantial evidence. And the other thing is of all those names, the one person who didnāt profit is⦠thereās no evidence that Joe Biden did anything illegally.ā
There is no circumstantial evidence of a particular crime.yes itās just circumstisnal evidence at this point. people can be convicted on that alone but donāt worry the probe goes on
of course there is, even your own quite stated thatThere is no circumstantial evidence of a particular crime.
That's just it. āYour party, the Republican investigators, say that thatās proof of influence peddling by Hunter and James [Biden], but thatās just your suggestion. You donāt actually have any facts to that point. Youāve got some circumstantial evidence,ā said Fox host Steve Doocey in an interview with Comer on Thursday.