Blues Man
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2016
- 35,513
- 14,899
- 1,530
You display your ignorance once again.You stated -
"The problem isn't the guns and it isn't law abiding gun owners it's the nuts that should have never been able to legally possess them"
So, if the nation gives everyone the Right to bear arms, how do you know if those obtaining guns is or will be law abiding.
Now, if you had a system where your background check involves family members and your mental state of mind by police interview, that you have to keep guns when not in use locked in a secure cabinet bolted to the wall that was checked by the police, only you are allowed to know where the cabinet key is, your reason to have/need guns is acceptable, you can't walk around in public with a gun let alone have it loaded in public, bullets/shotgun lead must be contained in the authorised grounds where you're shooting, the size and features of a gun have to comply to laws, buy back days and hand in days repeated every year, and in general, this is taken seriously or you are landed with fines, gun confiscated and possible jail, you tell me if the gun owner is more than likely law abiding.
Here some homework, you research when the Right to bear arms in the UK ended and who and when brought gun licensing in. Then find out how many decades ago that was for where guns are today in the UK.
If any American thinks they can implement a law or laws over night to stamp out gun problems, doesn't understand the gun problem.
There are two things, it'll take decades to sort out the gun nut problem, and if you're law abiding, why would you fear a better gun system !!!!!!!
Our federal gun laws clearly state who is prohibited from owning firearms.
We just do not enforce them.
And this last shooting could have been prevented by a locked door