Biden administration pushing for warrantless search and seizure by law enforcement

[marvin martian]

This is what you voted for, Democrats.

“A warrant should not … be presumptively required when a government official’s action is objectively grounded in a non-investigatory public interest, such as health or safety…The ultimate question in this case is therefore not whether the respondent officers’ actions fit within some narrow warrant exception, but instead whether those actions were reasonable. And under all of the circumstances here, they were.”

Biden Wants the Supreme Court to Allow the Police to Seize Guns From Your Home Without a Warrant

Gun grabber...

bongino.com

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

This is what you voted for, Democrats.

“A warrant should not … be presumptively required when a government official’s action is objectively grounded in a non-investigatory public interest, such as health or safety…The ultimate question in this case is therefore not whether the respondent officers’ actions fit within some narrow warrant exception, but instead whether those actions were reasonable. And under all of the circumstances here, they were.”

Biden Wants the Supreme Court to Allow the Police to Seize Guns From Your Home Without a Warrant

Gun grabber...

bongino.com

Interesting (and no surprise coming from Democrats), but I doubt local police would risk themselves and their families pursuing such unconstitutional actions openly.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

I don't see local authorities/deputies/sheriffs doing this. I know several in a couple of states who said they wouldn't abide.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

I don't see local authorities/deputies/sheriffs doing this. I know several in a couple of states who said they wouldn't abide.

Most of the Virginia counties have already said as much.

 

[Rigby5]

Weapons should be entirely a state or local issue.
Feds need to stay out of it entirely.
For example, a rifle in the vehicle makes sense in Alaska bear country, but not in NYC.

 

[harmonica]

...his jackassness never stops .....

 

[Viktor]

This is what you voted for, Democrats.

“A warrant should not … be presumptively required when a government official’s action is objectively grounded in a non-investigatory public interest, such as health or safety…The ultimate question in this case is therefore not whether the respondent officers’ actions fit within some narrow warrant exception, but instead whether those actions were reasonable. And under all of the circumstances here, they were.”

Biden Wants the Supreme Court to Allow the Police to Seize Guns From Your Home Without a Warrant

Gun grabber...

bongino.com

Jojo Biden hates guns. I left the Democratic party in 1988 because of all the lies he told about guns in Congress. He and Willy Clinton are two of the worst liars that ever went to Washington. They got an Assault weapon ban passed, but the voters got wise to them and
gave the GOP a majority several years later.

 

[marvin martian]

I don't see local authorities/deputies/sheriffs doing this. I know several in a couple of states who said they wouldn't abide.

Some will, some won't. Law enforcement agencies in the blue cities will have no problems doing this, they are virtually all run by leftists, and depriving people of their civil rights is what makes these scumbags truly happy.

The Biden administration is the most anti-civil rights organization currently in existence in America.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Weapons should be entirely a state or local issue.
Feds need to stay out of it entirely.
For example, a rifle in the vehicle makes sense in Alaska bear country, but not in NYC.

A strict reading of the 2nd Amendment indicates that the federal government has NO authority to restrict anything concerning the issue.

 

[struth]

Xiden....just following in the footsteps of his Chinese puppet masters...the left hates the the Constitution protections for individuals...

If this were to succeed Xiden will be able to justify any search for health reasons...

 

[marvin martian]

This is what you voted for, Democrats.

“A warrant should not … be presumptively required when a government official’s action is objectively grounded in a non-investigatory public interest, such as health or safety…The ultimate question in this case is therefore not whether the respondent officers’ actions fit within some narrow warrant exception, but instead whether those actions were reasonable. And under all of the circumstances here, they were.”

Biden Wants the Supreme Court to Allow the Police to Seize Guns From Your Home Without a Warrant

Gun grabber...

bongino.com

Jojo Biden hates guns. I left the Democratic party in 1988 because of all the lies he told about guns in Congress. He and Willy Clinton are two of the worst liars that ever went to Washington. They got an Assault weapon ban passed, but the voters got wise to them and
gave the GOP a majority several years later.

This isn't just about guns. Warrantless search and seizure would allow law enforcement to take anything they want from anyone, anytime.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Amendment 4 -

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Ain't gonna happen legally, Joe.

 

[marvin martian]

Amendment 4 -

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Ain't gonna happen legally, Joe.

Sadly, Chairman Xi's man in the White House doesn't give two shits about legality.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Amendment 4 -

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Ain't gonna happen legally, Joe.

Sadly, Chairman Xi's man in the White House doesn't give two shits about legality.

No matter. If the Court is cracked enough to authorize warrantless searches and seizures, there will be business.

 

[marvin martian]

Amendment 4 -

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Ain't gonna happen legally, Joe.

Sadly, Chairman Xi's man in the White House doesn't give two shits about legality.

No matter. If the Court is cracked enough to authorize warrantless searches and seizures, there will be business.

The fact that this anti-civil rights administration is asking for it makes me believe they think it has a shot.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Amendment 4 -

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Ain't gonna happen legally, Joe.

Sadly, Chairman Xi's man in the White House doesn't give two shits about legality.

No matter. If the Court is cracked enough to authorize warrantless searches and seizures, there will be business.

The fact that this anti-civil rights administration is asking for it makes me believe they think it has a shot.

Shrug.

Democrats traditionally push to the extremes of an issue, then accept a token win if that occurs.

Six months later, they're back for another piece. Winning by increments. That's why there should be no compromise with them. Ever.

 

[westwall]

This is what you voted for, Democrats.

“A warrant should not … be presumptively required when a government official’s action is objectively grounded in a non-investigatory public interest, such as health or safety…The ultimate question in this case is therefore not whether the respondent officers’ actions fit within some narrow warrant exception, but instead whether those actions were reasonable. And under all of the circumstances here, they were.”

Biden Wants the Supreme Court to Allow the Police to Seize Guns From Your Home Without a Warrant

Gun grabber...

bongino.com

Their master, China, wants us at war with each other.

 

[WTF19]

guess which door the weapon is behind.......good luck

 

[WTF19]

the next move the vile scum, twat, pig-lousi will do is rip the constitution up...try it [email protected] would be really sorry....trust us AMERICANS

 

[Concerned American]

This is what you voted for, Democrats.

“A warrant should not … be presumptively required when a government official’s action is objectively grounded in a non-investigatory public interest, such as health or safety…The ultimate question in this case is therefore not whether the respondent officers’ actions fit within some narrow warrant exception, but instead whether those actions were reasonable. And under all of the circumstances here, they were.”

Biden Wants the Supreme Court to Allow the Police to Seize Guns From Your Home Without a Warrant

Gun grabber...

bongino.com

Biden is a communist Chinese dupe.