healthmyths
Diamond Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 30,017
- 11,482
- 1,400
I was pointing out that you were using the same type of contextual conflation... when you are defending the so-called "witness" against Kavanaugh..
"Not unlike how a single witness has made comments about a potential justice, and most of us have dismissed that single witness for lack of evidence."
I am pointing out how consistent you are in your Anti-Trump, Anti-GOP, Anti-American stance as you again defend Beto and you have NO idea who he is or what he is like.
Yet you are making this opposition supportive statement about Kavanaugh's supposedly victim.
Mu stance on Beto and Kavanaugh are 100% consistent, just the opposite of you. Both of them have a single witness saying they did something that each say they did not do. Now, in your world Beto is 100% guilty because of that single witness while Kavanaugh is innocent because a single witness cannot be trusted. See, you use party affiliation to determine your truth and justice, while I take it out of the equation.
Everyone here knows my view on Trump, yet I have supported Kavanaugh from even before Trump choose him (I said before the pick I hoped he was the choice) and I have supported through this whole thing with Ford, never once wavering on my views of what Ford is doing.
I get why my actions are so out in left field for you, you cannot grasp the very concept of removing politics when determining the truth, you cannot imagine living life not being a mindless party sheep..and as such someone like me does not even compute in your tiny little mind.
But you know traitorgator... I totally expect that from someone who SAYS they were in the military for 20 years YET consistently berate the military for their efforts in Iraq/Afghanistan and blame the CIC for a decision that as I've consistently pointed out was bashed by the biased MSM.
I have never berated the military for their efforts in Iraq/Afghanistan, you are a lying bastard. We kicked their ass in both places just like the military was trained to do. Our job in the military is to destroy countries, not rebuild them. And yes, I blame the man that made the decision. You claim to be some sort of business owner yet you think the person making the decision carries not blame. One more bit of evidence you could not possibly run your own business.
I do not care if the MSM bashed it or not, I do not base my judgement by what the MSM does. The MSM bashed Bush and the support Ford over Kavanaugh, I bash Bush yet fully support Kavanaugh. Once again the difference between you and I, politics is not involved in my quest for truth.
You consistently support the biased MSM's very poor reporting especially against Trump and people like me that fundamentally don't like Trump's characteristics but recognize success of what he is doing! You seemingly can't look beyond your petty peeves about him and look at a bigger picture.
I give Trump the credit he is due, when he does something well I am more than happy to point it out.
By the way, I back up what I say so here is something for you...
View attachment 218016
Your contention regarding Iraq/Afghanistan is a "poor decision" by Bush.
Now explain to me how come the CIC after Bush who you evidently believe could do no wrong directly strictly for political correctness this ROE?
A laminated card ROE with the following text was distributed to all U.S. Army and Marine personnel in Iraq.
Policies about limiting civilian casualties have soldiers complaining they can't effectively fight;
one showed author Michael Hastings a card with regulations including:
"Patrol only in areas that you are reasonably certain that you will not have to defend yourselves with lethal force."
For a soldier who has traveled halfway around the world to fight, that’s like telling a cop he should only patrol in areas where he knows he won’t have to make arrests.
“Does that make any f–king sense?” Pfc. Jared Pautsch.
In Afghanistan, a New General -- But An Old Strategy
Now this was a CIC decision that created more problems in Iraq/Afghanistan for the military but I'm sure you agreed with Obama on this decision.
As far as the decision to Liberate Iraq which you find fault with was totally misrepresented by the MSM and I'm NOT surprised someone of your caliber can't see it.
There are several examples of HOW JUST like Vietnam the traitorous MSM LIKE you present images and stories slanted to their agenda and not the truth.
I imagine you believed the MSM that the US military lost in Vietnam just as today YOU think the US Military lost in Iraq and are losing in Afghanistan ...all because of decisions by
the President.
So argue with success in Iraq please where the per capita GDP under Saddam in 2003 was $637 yet in 2017 with a GDP per person $17,000?
The World Factbook — Central Intelligence Agency
And you fault GWB decision to keep 4 million Iraqi children from starving as they would have if Saddam was still in power today.
Iraq Sanctions Kill Children, U.N. Reports
And you fault GWB decision to STOP this:
"Following the end of the Gulf War in 1991, the marsh dwellers were important elements in the uprising against Saddam Hussein’s regime.
To end the rebellion, the regime implemented an intensive system of drainage and water diversion structures that desiccated over 90% of the marshes.
The reed beds were also burned and poison introduced to the waters. It is estimated that more than 500,000 were displaced, 95,000 of them to Iran, 300,000 internally displaced,
and the remainder to other countries. By January 2003, the majority of the marshes were wastelands.
Today: "After a decade of decline in which the fabled Marshlands of Mesopotamia all but vanished almost 40 per cent have now recovered to their former 1970s extent."
Iraq's marshlands: Resurrecting Eden
These are THREE benefits from the BAD decision you stated that GWB made in the "Liberation of Iraq".
Iraqis are better off in 2018 versus in 2003. Millions of Iraqi children are now alive that would have starved. An entire environment has been restored that would have be destroyed,
ALL because of the "BAD" decision according to YOU and your "military" genius!