Best Picture winner "Moonlight" was a commercial flop

ShootSpeeders

Gold Member
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
20,232
Reaction score
2,398
Points
280
IMDB says it cost $5 million and grossed $20 mill so it made money but a $20M gross is lousy. Why did it win? More black privilege and pervert privilege AKA affirmative action.

Moonlight (2016) - IMDb
 
IMDB says it cost $5 million and grossed $20 mill so it made money but a $20M gross is lousy. Why did it win? More black privilege and pervert privilege AKA affirmative action.

Moonlight (2016) - IMDb
What a whiny little cracka christer you are,thankfully your ilk are literally becoming the minority in America
 
How much a film costs or profits is not the basis for being awarded an Oscar.

It's not THE basis but it's a big factor. But not here. The libs had to give the oscar to a movie about black fags no matter what. THINK
 
Moonlight was about black queers. It was the politically correct choice. I would have been surprised if this piece of homo pro-child abuse piece of shit was not the winner.
 
Lazy cracker OP never accomplished anything and blames blacks because he's a total failure. All he ever does is whine.

In this case, he's whining - not because the film did or did not deserve the award, but only because the actors are black.
 
How much a film costs or profits is not the basis for being awarded an Oscar.

It's not THE basis but it's a big factor. But not here. The libs had to give the oscar to a movie about black fags no matter what. THINK

Perhaps you guys should get your own show and come up with a redneck peckerwood's awards trophy.
 
Last edited:
Never saw the movie but it sounds like something Liberals would love. Not only is the guy black but he's gay too. Now if he was transgender, we'd have the trifecta.
 
Has anyone noticed how crappy the movies are of late coming out of Hollywood. Even 'Arrival' and 'Interstellar' were disappointments. Hollywood sure knows how to start movies but they damned sure don't know how to finish them.
 
Never saw the movie but it sounds like something Liberals would love. Not only is the guy black but he's gay too. Now if he was transgender, we'd have the trifecta.
Ohhh. Disabled! That would have been the trifecta.
 
15th post
How much a film costs or profits is not the basis for being awarded an Oscar.

It's not THE basis but it's a big factor. But not here. The libs had to give the oscar to a movie about black fags no matter what. THINK
No, it isn't. The only factor is how many voters in the industry vote for it. They got the most votes. No EC votes over there. One person, one vote situation.
 
Back
Top Bottom