Bermuda Becomes First Country to Repeal Same-Sex Marriage After Widespread Criticisms

[Aba Incieni]

But why do you hate gays so much? And there is no such thing as sanctity of marriage, it’s just an excuse to openly hate homos.

Why do gays hate anticipated kids so much that they'd create a (illegal) contract that banishes them from either a mother or father for life?

You mean like single hetero parent families do?

Why do you hate heterosexuals so much?

You are correct. Gay marriage has destroyed the sanctity of marriage. That's what I've been telling you.

Gay marriage is driving you nuts! That’s all I really care about.

Real marriage made you crazy. Really tickles me.

Gay marriage is here to stay, chew on that for a while.

The meaning of marriage has changed forever. That's all.

In a good way.

Different, that's all. It doesn't mean the same thing as it used to.

 

[Taz]

But why do you hate gays so much? And there is no such thing as sanctity of marriage, it’s just an excuse to openly hate homos.

Why do gays hate anticipated kids so much that they'd create a (illegal) contract that banishes them from either a mother or father for life?

You mean like single hetero parent families do?

Gay marriage is driving you nuts! That’s all I really care about.

Real marriage made you crazy. Really tickles me.

Gay marriage is here to stay, chew on that for a while.

The meaning of marriage has changed forever. That's all.

In a good way.

Different, that's all. It doesn't mean the same thing as it used to.

Poor you, your feelings are hurt. Do you need a hankie?

 

[Aba Incieni]

Why do gays hate anticipated kids so much that they'd create a (illegal) contract that banishes them from either a mother or father for life?

You mean like single hetero parent families do?

Real marriage made you crazy. Really tickles me.

Gay marriage is here to stay, chew on that for a while.

The meaning of marriage has changed forever. That's all.

In a good way.

Different, that's all. It doesn't mean the same thing as it used to.

Poor you, your feelings are hurt. Do you need a hankie?

Language is fluid. Gay used to mean happy. Then it meant homosexual. Now it means lame.

Marriage used to mean between a man and woman. Homo envy, that's all. Fluid.

 

[Taz]

You mean like single hetero parent families do?
Gay marriage is here to stay, chew on that for a while.

The meaning of marriage has changed forever. That's all.

In a good way.

Different, that's all. It doesn't mean the same thing as it used to.

Poor you, your feelings are hurt. Do you need a hankie?

Language is fluid. Gay used to mean happy. Then it meant homosexual. Now it means lame.

Marriage used to mean between a man and woman. Homo envy, that's all. Fluid.

All this change!!! HOW CAN YOU COPE!!!!!

 

[Aba Incieni]

The meaning of marriage has changed forever. That's all.

In a good way.

Different, that's all. It doesn't mean the same thing as it used to.

Poor you, your feelings are hurt. Do you need a hankie?

Language is fluid. Gay used to mean happy. Then it meant homosexual. Now it means lame.

Marriage used to mean between a man and woman. Homo envy, that's all. Fluid.

All this change!!! HOW CAN YOU COPE!!!!!

It never ends. I don't even worry about climate change.

 

[AZGAL]

Strengthening heterosexual traditional marriage culture should be the next step. In addition no wedding cake baker has to be coerced to make custom cakes they do not believe in. The free market today includes online ordering so to worry about where your cake comes from is beyond entitlement bratty selfishness. Gay marriage is here to stay in the USA and so is the Constitutional right to freedom of religion and freedom of speech.

 

[Silhouette]

All this change!!! HOW CAN YOU COPE!!!!!

Your snark aside; the real question is how can kids cope with Obergefell. It ratified a brand new contract which banishes kids from either a mother or father for life. And it did so without their unique interests having counsel to brief the court. Which is a mistrial. Obergefell was a mistrial. Upon that phantom foundation you have the gall to tell people to accept illegal injustice "as law".

 

[Taz]

All this change!!! HOW CAN YOU COPE!!!!!

Your snark aside; the real question is how can kids cope with Obergefell. It ratified a brand new contract which banishes kids from either a mother or father for life. And it did so without their unique interests having counsel to brief the court. Which is a mistrial. Obergefell was a mistrial. Upon that phantom foundation you have the gall to tell people to accept illegal injustice "as law".

So you’d outlaw single parents as well?

 

[AZGAL]

Gay marriage is here to stay in the USA. That doesn't mean that every other rainbo fantasy is welcome though...

 

[fncceo]

give rights to white heterosexual shooters

The right to tequila, lime, and salt?

 

[danielpalos]

i no longer ask for or accept secret decoder ring codes with women from Craigslist, until after they do me, due to too many criticisms.

 

[Silhouette]

All this change!!! HOW CAN YOU COPE!!!!!

Your snark aside; the real question is how can kids cope with Obergefell. It ratified a brand new contract which banishes kids from either a mother or father for life. And it did so without their unique interests having counsel to brief the court. Which is a mistrial. Obergefell was a mistrial. Upon that phantom foundation you have the gall to tell people to accept illegal injustice "as law".

So you’d outlaw single parents as well?

Single parents don't possess a contract banishing children involved from the missing gendered parent for life. Gay marriage does this.

It isn't a matter of "outlawing". Infancy Doctrine deals with contracts that can or cannot exist with respect to children. Gay marriage contracts cannot exist because their terms banish children who are anticipated contractual beneficiaries, from something vital to them.

Also the Infancy Doctrine mandates that at any civil hearing in which children have a weighty stake, they must have separate counsel briefing the court on their unique interests. That never happened at Obergefell.

Therefore, Obergefell was a mistrial and isn't even worth the paper it was written on.

 

[Taz]

All this change!!! HOW CAN YOU COPE!!!!!

Your snark aside; the real question is how can kids cope with Obergefell. It ratified a brand new contract which banishes kids from either a mother or father for life. And it did so without their unique interests having counsel to brief the court. Which is a mistrial. Obergefell was a mistrial. Upon that phantom foundation you have the gall to tell people to accept illegal injustice "as law".

So you’d outlaw single parents as well?

Single parents don't possess a contract banishing children involved from the missing gendered parent for life. Gay marriage does this.

It isn't a matter of "outlawing". Infancy Doctrine deals with contracts that can or cannot exist with respect to children. Gay marriage contracts cannot exist because their terms banish children who are anticipated contractual beneficiaries, from something vital to them.

Also the Infancy Doctrine mandates that at any civil hearing in which children have a weighty stake, they must have separate counsel briefing the court on their unique interests. That never happened at Obergefell.

Therefore, Obergefell was a mistrial and isn't even worth the paper it was written on.

"banish children who are anticipated contractual beneficiaries, from something vital to them." Like a single parent does.

 

[Aba Incieni]

All this change!!! HOW CAN YOU COPE!!!!!

Your snark aside; the real question is how can kids cope with Obergefell. It ratified a brand new contract which banishes kids from either a mother or father for life. And it did so without their unique interests having counsel to brief the court. Which is a mistrial. Obergefell was a mistrial. Upon that phantom foundation you have the gall to tell people to accept illegal injustice "as law".

So you’d outlaw single parents as well?

Single parents don't possess a contract banishing children involved from the missing gendered parent for life. Gay marriage does this.

It isn't a matter of "outlawing". Infancy Doctrine deals with contracts that can or cannot exist with respect to children. Gay marriage contracts cannot exist because their terms banish children who are anticipated contractual beneficiaries, from something vital to them.

Also the Infancy Doctrine mandates that at any civil hearing in which children have a weighty stake, they must have separate counsel briefing the court on their unique interests. That never happened at Obergefell.

Therefore, Obergefell was a mistrial and isn't even worth the paper it was written on.

"banish children who are anticipated contractual beneficiaries, from something vital to them." Like a single parent does.

Children are a huge consideration in all divorce proceedings. Rather than being banished, they are the main consideration.

 

[RealDave]

Bermuda is a country?!

Bermuda Becomes First Country to Repeal Same-Sex Marriage After Widespread Criticisms

Wow, A bigoted country where you bigoted ***** go visit.

 

[Silhouette]

All this change!!! HOW CAN YOU COPE!!!!!

Your snark aside; the real question is how can kids cope with Obergefell. It ratified a brand new contract which banishes kids from either a mother or father for life. And it did so without their unique interests having counsel to brief the court. Which is a mistrial. Obergefell was a mistrial. Upon that phantom foundation you have the gall to tell people to accept illegal injustice "as law".

So you’d outlaw single parents as well?

Single parents don't possess a contract banishing children involved from the missing gendered parent for life. Gay marriage does this.

It isn't a matter of "outlawing". Infancy Doctrine deals with contracts that can or cannot exist with respect to children. Gay marriage contracts cannot exist because their terms banish children who are anticipated contractual beneficiaries, from something vital to them.

Also the Infancy Doctrine mandates that at any civil hearing in which children have a weighty stake, they must have separate counsel briefing the court on their unique interests. That never happened at Obergefell.

Therefore, Obergefell was a mistrial and isn't even worth the paper it was written on.

"banish children who are anticipated contractual beneficiaries, from something vital to them." Like a single parent does.

A widow divorced or an abandoned mother makes nor signs a contract saying "i will deprive this child for life from the missing parent"

Incidentally, even in divorce the court takes the child's interests separately, continuing contact with mother & father until the child is of age. Even when her parents no longer want to interact. This proves a child's dominance & benefit in the marriage contract even over adults.

Therefore for children not to have counsel briefing O ergefell was a mistrial.

 

[Taz]

All this change!!! HOW CAN YOU COPE!!!!!

Your snark aside; the real question is how can kids cope with Obergefell. It ratified a brand new contract which banishes kids from either a mother or father for life. And it did so without their unique interests having counsel to brief the court. Which is a mistrial. Obergefell was a mistrial. Upon that phantom foundation you have the gall to tell people to accept illegal injustice "as law".

So you’d outlaw single parents as well?

Single parents don't possess a contract banishing children involved from the missing gendered parent for life. Gay marriage does this.

It isn't a matter of "outlawing". Infancy Doctrine deals with contracts that can or cannot exist with respect to children. Gay marriage contracts cannot exist because their terms banish children who are anticipated contractual beneficiaries, from something vital to them.

Also the Infancy Doctrine mandates that at any civil hearing in which children have a weighty stake, they must have separate counsel briefing the court on their unique interests. That never happened at Obergefell.

Therefore, Obergefell was a mistrial and isn't even worth the paper it was written on.

"banish children who are anticipated contractual beneficiaries, from something vital to them." Like a single parent does.

Children are a huge consideration in all divorce proceedings. Rather than being banished, they are the main consideration.

Do you think that divorce is very hard on children? And that that's still better than having 2 mommies who love them?

 

[Aba Incieni]

Your snark aside; the real question is how can kids cope with Obergefell. It ratified a brand new contract which banishes kids from either a mother or father for life. And it did so without their unique interests having counsel to brief the court. Which is a mistrial. Obergefell was a mistrial. Upon that phantom foundation you have the gall to tell people to accept illegal injustice "as law".

So you’d outlaw single parents as well?

Single parents don't possess a contract banishing children involved from the missing gendered parent for life. Gay marriage does this.

It isn't a matter of "outlawing". Infancy Doctrine deals with contracts that can or cannot exist with respect to children. Gay marriage contracts cannot exist because their terms banish children who are anticipated contractual beneficiaries, from something vital to them.

Also the Infancy Doctrine mandates that at any civil hearing in which children have a weighty stake, they must have separate counsel briefing the court on their unique interests. That never happened at Obergefell.

Therefore, Obergefell was a mistrial and isn't even worth the paper it was written on.

"banish children who are anticipated contractual beneficiaries, from something vital to them." Like a single parent does.

Children are a huge consideration in all divorce proceedings. Rather than being banished, they are the main consideration.

Do you think that divorce is very hard on children? And that that's still better than having 2 mommies who love them?

Yes, no. It's hard on children but take a look at your black population to see what happens with absentee fathers.

 

[Taz]

All this change!!! HOW CAN YOU COPE!!!!!

Your snark aside; the real question is how can kids cope with Obergefell. It ratified a brand new contract which banishes kids from either a mother or father for life. And it did so without their unique interests having counsel to brief the court. Which is a mistrial. Obergefell was a mistrial. Upon that phantom foundation you have the gall to tell people to accept illegal injustice "as law".

So you’d outlaw single parents as well?

Single parents don't possess a contract banishing children involved from the missing gendered parent for life. Gay marriage does this.

It isn't a matter of "outlawing". Infancy Doctrine deals with contracts that can or cannot exist with respect to children. Gay marriage contracts cannot exist because their terms banish children who are anticipated contractual beneficiaries, from something vital to them.

Also the Infancy Doctrine mandates that at any civil hearing in which children have a weighty stake, they must have separate counsel briefing the court on their unique interests. That never happened at Obergefell.

Therefore, Obergefell was a mistrial and isn't even worth the paper it was written on.

"banish children who are anticipated contractual beneficiaries, from something vital to them." Like a single parent does.

A widow divorced or an abandoned mother makes nor signs a contract saying "i will deprive this child for life from the missing parent"

Incidentally, even in divorce the court takes the child's interests separately, continuing contact with mother & father until the child is of age. Even when her parents no longer want to interact. This proves a child's dominance & benefit in the marriage contract even over adults.

Therefore for children not to have counsel briefing O ergefell was a mistrial.

As if you can get a parent to interact with a child until their an adult. If the father wants to bugger off and never see his kid again, he will. Black people do it all the time.

So a single parent, divorced..., is still better than 2 loving mommies who aren't going to split their family up?

And isn't the hetero marriage contract say "till death do us part"? So they get to break the contract at will through divorce? C'mon, get a grip.

 

[Taz]

So you’d outlaw single parents as well?

Single parents don't possess a contract banishing children involved from the missing gendered parent for life. Gay marriage does this.

It isn't a matter of "outlawing". Infancy Doctrine deals with contracts that can or cannot exist with respect to children. Gay marriage contracts cannot exist because their terms banish children who are anticipated contractual beneficiaries, from something vital to them.

Also the Infancy Doctrine mandates that at any civil hearing in which children have a weighty stake, they must have separate counsel briefing the court on their unique interests. That never happened at Obergefell.

Therefore, Obergefell was a mistrial and isn't even worth the paper it was written on.

"banish children who are anticipated contractual beneficiaries, from something vital to them." Like a single parent does.

Children are a huge consideration in all divorce proceedings. Rather than being banished, they are the main consideration.

Do you think that divorce is very hard on children? And that that's still better than having 2 mommies who love them?

Yes, no. It's hard on children but take a look at your black population to see what happens with absentee fathers.

Yes, but no all gay unions are living in poverty like the black single mother usually do. The child also won't feel abandoned by one parent, as single parent children can. And some single mothers have children with no intention of having the birth father involved, is that still better that a gay couple?