Roudy
Diamond Member
- Mar 16, 2012
- 60,571
- 18,556
- 2,250
It looks like the days of the BDS (Bowel Discharge Movement) are numbered. It has been exposed for what it is.
And now...Blacklisted in almost all the major universities!
The American Studies Association's BDS Resolution | The Louis D. Brandeis Center Blog
The ASAs New Image
The ASA Was the Biggest Loser
In the end, the ASA is the biggest loser, and this outcome will not be lost on other associations. For its efforts, the ASA is now publicly mocked, ridiculed and condemned, even by some of its own members and past presidents, as well as by major scholars and numerous university presidents. Even those who do not discern anti-Semitism in the ASA resolution nevertheless perceive a violation of academic freedom. The American Association of University Professors announced that the boycott would violate the academic freedom not only of Israeli scholars but also of American scholars who might be pressured to comply with it. More importantly, perhaps, the ASA has now lost any scholarly reputation that it might previously have had and is now seen as a largely political institution.
Four universities have already terminated their institutional memberships in the ASA. Penn State Harrisburg was the first to cut its formal ties, followed by Brandeis University, Indiana University at Bloomington, and Kenyon College. These four institutions should be honored for their leadership.
In short order, over sixty universities have issued strong statements rejecting the ASAs actions. Professor William A. Jacobson compiled this list of institutions that have denounced the ASA boycott:
American University (D.C.)
Birmingham Southern College
Boston University
Bowdon College
Brandeis University
Brooklyn College, CUNY
Brown University
Case Western Reserve University
Cornell University
Dickinson College
Duke University
Florida International University
Fordham University
George Washington University
Hamilton College
Harvard University
Haverford College
Indiana University
Johns Hopkins University
Kenyon College
Lehigh University
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Michigan State
Middlebury College
New York University
Northwestern University
Ohio State
Princeton University
Purdue University
Rhode Island College
Rutgers University
Smith College
Stanford University
The City University of New York
Trinity College (CT)
Tufts University
Tulane University
University of Alabama System
University of California System
University of California-Berkeley
University of California-Irvine
University of California-San Diego
University of Chicago
University of Cincinnati
University of Connecticut
University of Delaware
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
University of Kansas
University of Maryland
University of Maryland Baltimore County
University of Miami
University of Michigan
University of Pennsylvania
University of Pittsburgh
University of Southern California
University of Texas-Austin
Washington University in St. Louis
Wesleyan University
Willamette University
Yale University
Yeshiva University
Other Universities May (and Should) Cut Ties
More universities may, and should, cut their institutional memberships with ASA. As former Harvard University President Lawrence Summers has cogently argued, My hope would be that responsible university leaders will become very reluctant to see their universitys funds used to finance faculty membership and faculty travel to an association that is showing itself not to be a scholarly association but really more of a political tool.
The Courts May Have the Final Say
The ASA may be held accountable in other ways too. Its resolution has, to say the least, pushed the legal envelope with respect to anti-boycott laws. Several groups, including the Louis D. Brandeis Center, are contemplating taking legal action against the association. Anti-Israel boycotts may violate federal anti-boycott law, as well as the laws of some states, such as Section 296(13) of New Yorks Human Rights Law, and localities. The ASA, and other institutions that adopt such boycott resolutions, should not be surprised to find themselves in court.
In addition, the BDS resolution may jeopardize the ASAs tax-exempt status with the Internal Revenue Service, since it is arguably a political activity outside of the ASAs mission. The ASA is on notice that its tax-exempt status may soon be challenged.
MLA is Next
Sadly, the ASA is not alone. Despite the troubles that the ASA has brought upon itself, other academic associations are considering similar action. The Modern Language Association (MLA) is next in line. In its upcoming conference, the MLA is considering an anti-Israel motion. While not technically a BDS resolution, the MLAs more narrowly crafted resolution also reflects antipathy towards the Jewish state.
Update: Georgetown University has informed us that they do not have an institutional membership in the ASA and that they have issued a statement criticizing the ASAs action. We have heard from Columbia University faculty that both Columbia and Barnard have also issued statements criticizing the ASAs resolution.
And now...Blacklisted in almost all the major universities!
The American Studies Association's BDS Resolution | The Louis D. Brandeis Center Blog
The ASAs New Image
The ASA Was the Biggest Loser
In the end, the ASA is the biggest loser, and this outcome will not be lost on other associations. For its efforts, the ASA is now publicly mocked, ridiculed and condemned, even by some of its own members and past presidents, as well as by major scholars and numerous university presidents. Even those who do not discern anti-Semitism in the ASA resolution nevertheless perceive a violation of academic freedom. The American Association of University Professors announced that the boycott would violate the academic freedom not only of Israeli scholars but also of American scholars who might be pressured to comply with it. More importantly, perhaps, the ASA has now lost any scholarly reputation that it might previously have had and is now seen as a largely political institution.
Four universities have already terminated their institutional memberships in the ASA. Penn State Harrisburg was the first to cut its formal ties, followed by Brandeis University, Indiana University at Bloomington, and Kenyon College. These four institutions should be honored for their leadership.
In short order, over sixty universities have issued strong statements rejecting the ASAs actions. Professor William A. Jacobson compiled this list of institutions that have denounced the ASA boycott:
American University (D.C.)
Birmingham Southern College
Boston University
Bowdon College
Brandeis University
Brooklyn College, CUNY
Brown University
Case Western Reserve University
Cornell University
Dickinson College
Duke University
Florida International University
Fordham University
George Washington University
Hamilton College
Harvard University
Haverford College
Indiana University
Johns Hopkins University
Kenyon College
Lehigh University
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Michigan State
Middlebury College
New York University
Northwestern University
Ohio State
Princeton University
Purdue University
Rhode Island College
Rutgers University
Smith College
Stanford University
The City University of New York
Trinity College (CT)
Tufts University
Tulane University
University of Alabama System
University of California System
University of California-Berkeley
University of California-Irvine
University of California-San Diego
University of Chicago
University of Cincinnati
University of Connecticut
University of Delaware
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
University of Kansas
University of Maryland
University of Maryland Baltimore County
University of Miami
University of Michigan
University of Pennsylvania
University of Pittsburgh
University of Southern California
University of Texas-Austin
Washington University in St. Louis
Wesleyan University
Willamette University
Yale University
Yeshiva University
Other Universities May (and Should) Cut Ties
More universities may, and should, cut their institutional memberships with ASA. As former Harvard University President Lawrence Summers has cogently argued, My hope would be that responsible university leaders will become very reluctant to see their universitys funds used to finance faculty membership and faculty travel to an association that is showing itself not to be a scholarly association but really more of a political tool.
The Courts May Have the Final Say
The ASA may be held accountable in other ways too. Its resolution has, to say the least, pushed the legal envelope with respect to anti-boycott laws. Several groups, including the Louis D. Brandeis Center, are contemplating taking legal action against the association. Anti-Israel boycotts may violate federal anti-boycott law, as well as the laws of some states, such as Section 296(13) of New Yorks Human Rights Law, and localities. The ASA, and other institutions that adopt such boycott resolutions, should not be surprised to find themselves in court.
In addition, the BDS resolution may jeopardize the ASAs tax-exempt status with the Internal Revenue Service, since it is arguably a political activity outside of the ASAs mission. The ASA is on notice that its tax-exempt status may soon be challenged.
MLA is Next
Sadly, the ASA is not alone. Despite the troubles that the ASA has brought upon itself, other academic associations are considering similar action. The Modern Language Association (MLA) is next in line. In its upcoming conference, the MLA is considering an anti-Israel motion. While not technically a BDS resolution, the MLAs more narrowly crafted resolution also reflects antipathy towards the Jewish state.
Update: Georgetown University has informed us that they do not have an institutional membership in the ASA and that they have issued a statement criticizing the ASAs action. We have heard from Columbia University faculty that both Columbia and Barnard have also issued statements criticizing the ASAs resolution.