Barry Fears Blacks Won't Back Hillary

[Theowl32]

obie was trying to scare them yesterday. At a black college in NC he told them on Trump's first day he would eliminate Medicare, Medicaid and Pell grants (federal aid for college). The president doesn't have that authority so he lied or he is the dumb fuck he started out to be.

'SSDD' - Same Shit Different Day. This is the traditional, 'old faithful' Liberal 'boogey man' Fear-Mongering tactic, usually reserved only for the elderly:

'The GOP is coming for your Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaide'!

Halloween's over, Barry - enough with trying to scare people!

(Liberals have proven they can not win on ideology or results - they have to rely on Fear-Mongering, Lies, the 'Politics of Personal Destruction', handing out tons of 'free shit', and Election Fraud!)

Rubio said if Social Security isn't dealt with, it will be belly up in a couple decades. Trump isn't dealing with it. That's not Democratic fear mongering.

What's your solution? Cause what Rubio is saying, is true.

What, are the democrats lying to you about that too?

This is what the Dems are saying, which is primarily bullshit but they've at least proposed a solution, or the beginning of one. TN says Trump might "look at it" in the future. Neither are perfect answers. I thought Rubio's made sense. But it's not in Trump's playbook, apparently.

The Democratic Platform:
Protecting and Expanding Social Security Democrats are proud to be the party that created Social Security, one of the nation’s most successful and effective programs. Without Social Security, nearly half of America’s seniors would be living in poverty. Social Security is more than just a retirement program. It also provides important life insurance to young survivors of deceased workers and provides disability insurance protection. We will fight every effort to cut, privatize, or weaken Social Security, including attempts to raise the retirement age, diminish benefits by cutting cost-of-living adjustments, or reducing earned benefits. Democrats will expand Social Security so that every American can retire with dignity and respect, including women who are widowed or took time out of the workforce to care for their children, aging parents, or ailing family members. The Democratic Party recognizes that the way Social Security cost-of- living adjustments are calculated may not always reflect the spending patterns of seniors, particularly the disproportionate amount they spend on health care expenses. We are committed to exploring alternatives that could better and more equitably serve seniors. We will make sure Social Security’s guaranteed benefits continue for generations to come by asking those at the top to pay more, and will achieve this goal by taxing some of the income of people above $250,000. The Democratic Party is also committed to providing all necessary financial support for the Social Security Administration so that it can provide timely benefits and high-quality service for those it serves. Our plan contrasts starkly with Donald Trump. He has referred to Social Security as a “Ponzi scheme” and has called for privatizing it as well as increasing the retirement age.

SS is a third rail topic. I can assure you if Trump addressed the SS issue and told THE TRUTH about it, the democrats behind the PRAVDA MEDIA complex would have crushed him.

Hardball politics says to stay away from that topic during a campaign running up to an election.

Basic politics 101

 

[Iceweasel]

The Democratic Platform:
Protecting and Expanding Social Security Democrats are proud to be the party that created Social Security, one of the nation’s most successful and effective programs. Without Social Security, nearly half of America’s seniors would be living in poverty. Social Security is more than just a retirement program. It also provides important life insurance to young survivors of deceased workers and provides disability insurance protection. We will fight every effort to cut, privatize, or weaken Social Security, including attempts to raise the retirement age, diminish benefits by cutting cost-of-living adjustments, or reducing earned benefits. Democrats will expand Social Security so that every American can retire with dignity and respect, including women who are widowed or took time out of the workforce to care for their children, aging parents, or ailing family members. The Democratic Party recognizes that the way Social Security cost-of- living adjustments are calculated may not always reflect the spending patterns of seniors, particularly the disproportionate amount they spend on health care expenses. We are committed to exploring alternatives that could better and more equitably serve seniors. We will make sure Social Security’s guaranteed benefits continue for generations to come by asking those at the top to pay more, and will achieve this goal by taxing some of the income of people above $250,000. The Democratic Party is also committed to providing all necessary financial support for the Social Security Administration so that it can provide timely benefits and high-quality service for those it serves. Our plan contrasts starkly with Donald Trump. He has referred to Social Security as a “Ponzi scheme” and has called for privatizing it as well as increasing the retirement age.

How is that going to fix it? Increasing those eligible for SS is going to drive costs down so it can remain solvent?

 

[OldLady]

The Democratic Platform:
Protecting and Expanding Social Security Democrats are proud to be the party that created Social Security, one of the nation’s most successful and effective programs. Without Social Security, nearly half of America’s seniors would be living in poverty. Social Security is more than just a retirement program. It also provides important life insurance to young survivors of deceased workers and provides disability insurance protection. We will fight every effort to cut, privatize, or weaken Social Security, including attempts to raise the retirement age, diminish benefits by cutting cost-of-living adjustments, or reducing earned benefits. Democrats will expand Social Security so that every American can retire with dignity and respect, including women who are widowed or took time out of the workforce to care for their children, aging parents, or ailing family members. The Democratic Party recognizes that the way Social Security cost-of- living adjustments are calculated may not always reflect the spending patterns of seniors, particularly the disproportionate amount they spend on health care expenses. We are committed to exploring alternatives that could better and more equitably serve seniors. We will make sure Social Security’s guaranteed benefits continue for generations to come by asking those at the top to pay more, and will achieve this goal by taxing some of the income of people above $250,000. The Democratic Party is also committed to providing all necessary financial support for the Social Security Administration so that it can provide timely benefits and high-quality service for those it serves. Our plan contrasts starkly with Donald Trump. He has referred to Social Security as a “Ponzi scheme” and has called for privatizing it as well as increasing the retirement age.

How is that going to fix it? Increasing those eligible for SS is going to drive costs down so it can remain solvent?

I don't agree with it, particularly since taxing the wealthy doesn't accomplish anything, if we go by what Trump pays in personal income tax. I thought Rubio's plan made sense. Was that post too long for you?

 

[OldLady]

Rubio said if Social Security isn't dealt with, it will be belly up in a couple decades. Trump isn't dealing with it. That's not Democratic fear mongering.

OL, would you agree there is a HUGE difference between 'IGNORING SS' and 'The GOP is COMING for your SS'?!

Easy, we're days away from the election and everyone will pull out every argument they've got, I suppose, but I don't see this "fear mongering" as any worse than the fear mongering that has been consistently used on the Republicans' side. Rapists and terrorists invading in hoardes, etc.
Sorry I turned your thread into a discussion on SS.

 

[miketx]

I think at this point, bunghole barry fears everything. jail being #1

 

[Iceweasel]

The Democratic Platform:
Protecting and Expanding Social Security Democrats are proud to be the party that created Social Security, one of the nation’s most successful and effective programs. Without Social Security, nearly half of America’s seniors would be living in poverty. Social Security is more than just a retirement program. It also provides important life insurance to young survivors of deceased workers and provides disability insurance protection. We will fight every effort to cut, privatize, or weaken Social Security, including attempts to raise the retirement age, diminish benefits by cutting cost-of-living adjustments, or reducing earned benefits. Democrats will expand Social Security so that every American can retire with dignity and respect, including women who are widowed or took time out of the workforce to care for their children, aging parents, or ailing family members. The Democratic Party recognizes that the way Social Security cost-of- living adjustments are calculated may not always reflect the spending patterns of seniors, particularly the disproportionate amount they spend on health care expenses. We are committed to exploring alternatives that could better and more equitably serve seniors. We will make sure Social Security’s guaranteed benefits continue for generations to come by asking those at the top to pay more, and will achieve this goal by taxing some of the income of people above $250,000. The Democratic Party is also committed to providing all necessary financial support for the Social Security Administration so that it can provide timely benefits and high-quality service for those it serves. Our plan contrasts starkly with Donald Trump. He has referred to Social Security as a “Ponzi scheme” and has called for privatizing it as well as increasing the retirement age.

How is that going to fix it? Increasing those eligible for SS is going to drive costs down so it can remain solvent?

I don't agree with it, particularly since taxing the wealthy doesn't accomplish anything, if we go by what Trump pays in personal income tax. I thought Rubio's plan made sense. Was that post too long for you?

How much does Trump pay in taxes? You haven't said. Nor can you. I don't know why you posted a solution you don't agree with. Makes no sense.

 

[mamooth]

Check it out. Yet Another thread of weepy Trump-cucks desperately trying to convince themselves that they're not losers who are losing big.

Clearly, as demonstrated by their hysterical tone, it's not working.

Enjoy losing, Trump-cucks. We're going to enjoy rubbing your loser-status in your face for years to come. If you weren't such awful human beings, we wouldn't do that, but you are, so we will. There needs to be some penalty for acting as badly as you do.

 

[easyt65]

Rubio said if Social Security isn't dealt with, it will be belly up in a couple decades. Trump isn't dealing with it. That's not Democratic fear mongering.

OL, would you agree there is a HUGE difference between 'IGNORING SS' and 'The GOP is COMING for your SS'?!

Easy, we're days away from the election and everyone will pull out every argument they've got, I suppose, but I don't see this "fear mongering" as any worse than the fear mongering that has been consistently used on the Republicans' side. Rapists and terrorists invading in hoardes, etc.
Sorry I turned your thread into a discussion on SS.

You didn't answer my question. Would you agree?

 

[Iceweasel]

Rubio said if Social Security isn't dealt with, it will be belly up in a couple decades. Trump isn't dealing with it. That's not Democratic fear mongering.

OL, would you agree there is a HUGE difference between 'IGNORING SS' and 'The GOP is COMING for your SS'?!

Easy, we're days away from the election and everyone will pull out every argument they've got, I suppose, but I don't see this "fear mongering" as any worse than the fear mongering that has been consistently used on the Republicans' side. Rapists and terrorists invading in hoardes, etc.
Sorry I turned your thread into a discussion on SS.

Lots of women are raped my illegals. Killed too. The left wants more immigrants in from countries not too women friendly, we have Europe to look at. Explain how that's fear mongering and why don't you care about rape and murder?

 

[Iceweasel]

Check it out. Yet Another thread of weepy Trump-cucks desperately trying to convince themselves that they're not losers who are losing big.

Clearly, as demonstrated by their hysterical tone, it's not working.

Enjoy losing, Trump-cucks. We're going to enjoy rubbing your loser-status in your face for years to come. If you weren't all such awful human beings, we wouldn't do that, but you are, so we will. There needs to be some penalty for acting so badly.

Just look at this smarmy subhuman piece of shit tell us we are awful.

LOL, what a retard.

 

[easyt65]

Check it out. Yet Another thread of weepy Trump....

Another example of Libs creating false narratives. If there isn't a story out there that supports Libs' distractions and rants, they create one.

 

[OldLady]

Rubio said if Social Security isn't dealt with, it will be belly up in a couple decades. Trump isn't dealing with it. That's not Democratic fear mongering.

OL, would you agree there is a HUGE difference between 'IGNORING SS' and 'The GOP is COMING for your SS'?!

Easy, we're days away from the election and everyone will pull out every argument they've got, I suppose, but I don't see this "fear mongering" as any worse than the fear mongering that has been consistently used on the Republicans' side. Rapists and terrorists invading in hoardes, etc.
Sorry I turned your thread into a discussion on SS.

You didn't answer my question. Would you agree?

You got my reply already. Read it again.

 

[easyt65]

Rubio said if Social Security isn't dealt with, it will be belly up in a couple decades. Trump isn't dealing with it. That's not Democratic fear mongering.

OL, would you agree there is a HUGE difference between 'IGNORING SS' and 'The GOP is COMING for your SS'?!

Easy, we're days away from the election and everyone will pull out every argument they've got, I suppose, but I don't see this "fear mongering" as any worse than the fear mongering that has been consistently used on the Republicans' side. Rapists and terrorists invading in hoardes, etc.
Sorry I turned your thread into a discussion on SS.

You didn't answer my question. Would you agree?

You got my reply already. Read it again.

OL: You got my reply already. Read it again,"

OK, I did - you said, "Sorry I turned your thread into a discussion on SS."

You even admitted not answering my question, which was, "would you agree there is a HUGE difference between 'IGNORING SS' and 'The GOP is COMING for your SS'.

 

[OldLady]

Rubio said if Social Security isn't dealt with, it will be belly up in a couple decades. Trump isn't dealing with it. That's not Democratic fear mongering.

OL, would you agree there is a HUGE difference between 'IGNORING SS' and 'The GOP is COMING for your SS'?!

Easy, we're days away from the election and everyone will pull out every argument they've got, I suppose, but I don't see this "fear mongering" as any worse than the fear mongering that has been consistently used on the Republicans' side. Rapists and terrorists invading in hoardes, etc.
Sorry I turned your thread into a discussion on SS.

Lots of women are raped my illegals. Killed too. The left wants more immigrants in from countries not too women friendly, we have Europe to look at. Explain how that's fear mongering and why don't you care about rape and murder?

You're still fear mongering. I'm not so frightened that I think building a physical wall will solve our problems. A lot LOT more women are raped by good ol' American born boys. Of course we should prosecute undocumented criminals and I think we should send them back where they came from, not feed and house them on the tax payer's dime for five years or whatever. We shouldn't pay for their attorneys, either.
Muslims coming to this country have been doing fine. They are subject to our laws and the LEO's will handle any confusion on what is allowed in this country.

 

[OldLady]

Rubio said if Social Security isn't dealt with, it will be belly up in a couple decades. Trump isn't dealing with it. That's not Democratic fear mongering.

OL, would you agree there is a HUGE difference between 'IGNORING SS' and 'The GOP is COMING for your SS'?!

Easy, we're days away from the election and everyone will pull out every argument they've got, I suppose, but I don't see this "fear mongering" as any worse than the fear mongering that has been consistently used on the Republicans' side. Rapists and terrorists invading in hoardes, etc.
Sorry I turned your thread into a discussion on SS.

You didn't answer my question. Would you agree?

You got my reply already. Read it again.

OL: You got my reply already. Read it again,"

OK, I did - you said, "Sorry I turned your thread into a discussion on SS."

You even admitted not answering my question, which was, "would you agree there is a HUGE difference between 'IGNORING SS' and 'The GOP is COMING for your SS'.

Excuse me, sir. You seem to have my pants leg in your mouth.
I don't see this "fear mongering" as any worse than the fear mongering that has been consistently used on the Republicans' side.
That's all you're getting.

 

[miketx]

 

[Iceweasel]

Rubio said if Social Security isn't dealt with, it will be belly up in a couple decades. Trump isn't dealing with it. That's not Democratic fear mongering.

OL, would you agree there is a HUGE difference between 'IGNORING SS' and 'The GOP is COMING for your SS'?!

Easy, we're days away from the election and everyone will pull out every argument they've got, I suppose, but I don't see this "fear mongering" as any worse than the fear mongering that has been consistently used on the Republicans' side. Rapists and terrorists invading in hoardes, etc.
Sorry I turned your thread into a discussion on SS.

Lots of women are raped my illegals. Killed too. The left wants more immigrants in from countries not too women friendly, we have Europe to look at. Explain how that's fear mongering and why don't you care about rape and murder?

You're still fear mongering. I'm not so frightened that I think building a physical wall will solve our problems. A lot LOT more women are raped by good ol' American born boys. Of course we should prosecute undocumented criminals and I think we should send them back where they came from, not feed and house them on the tax payer's dime for five years or whatever. We shouldn't pay for their attorneys, either.
Muslims coming to this country have been doing fine. They are subject to our laws and the LEO's will handle any confusion on what is allowed in this country.

You live in denial. No wonder you think the right is fear mongering. Many many stories about illegals and crime. Home grown crime doesn't make it disappear. And like I said Europe is having huge problems with Muslims, they are not doing "fine". Your head is firmly ensconced.

 

[easyt65]

You're still fear mongering.

No, I'm not the one telling old people and college kids that the GOP 'boogey men' are coming for their SS. I am simply asking you if there is a difference between the President saying accurately 'politicians are ignoring the problem of SS' and his fear-mongering of telling people 'The GOP is coming for you / your SS'. I am also not the one avoiding the simple question...

 

[Pop23]

Hmmmm, let's see...

She called blacks 'Super Predators'...

She tried to throw a black man and black woman - Collin Powel and Condi Rice - under the bus to protect her ass in the FBI investigation into her e-mails...

The DNC and Hillary's leaked emails exposed them for racistly mocking, making jokes about, and insulting blacks...

A rich liberal elitist donor was just exposed calling blacks 'Nazis', 'Murderers', and 'F*ed up in the head' for not supporting the Liberal agenda & candidates....

Louis Farrakhan just compared Hillary to Hitler...

Black turn-out for Hillary early voting is reportedly down...

Nah, she'll be fine.


Obama worries black vote is not solid enough for Clinton

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/02/u...ting-boding-ill-for-hillary-clinton.html?_r=0

I heard that speach.

I thought it actually was one of the most racist speeches I'd heard in decades.

 

[easyt65]

I heard that speach. I thought it actually was one of the most racist speeches I'd heard in decades.

This speech coming from Mr. 'Lie of the Year' who promised to end racism in America with his election as President.