The Infidel
EVIL CONSERVATIVE
Best recourse is to simply not bank with those creeps.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
so a bank can discriminate against a customer's 2nd Amendment Rights....?
and Bank of America is Sharia compliant......?
but no Christian company can discriminate against a woman wanting contraceptives....?
A blogger on the partisan site American Thinker is using a nine month old article from The Daily Pisser as his source for this information.
This is a new one. You are thinking of the stunt they pulled last April.
And if they did it in states where sexuality is a protected class they'd be breaking the law.
Sorry but there are no laws making sellers of guns over the internet a protected class.
Are you going to keep whining?
Then the law is hampering the free market, you shouldn't bother bringing it up when it suits the need. Like in your retarded signature.
Please speak in complete sentences.
it's not free when you whiny socialist bitches force companies to do your bidding....
if BofA chose not to bank for gays you would be out in full whining mode....
A. Sorry, little girl, not a socialist.
B. No one is forcing this company to do anything.
C. You hate the free market. Is that because you've been on welfare your entire life?
see above post retard...
it's not free when you whiny socialist bitches force companies to do your bidding....
if BofA chose not to bank for gays you would be out in full whining mode....
And if they did it in states where sexuality is a protected class they'd be breaking the law.
Sorry but there are no laws making sellers of guns over the internet a protected class.
Are you going to keep whining?
i never said BofA couldn't choose to not bank for the gun dealer...(of course that was not mentioned when he opened the account and used it for 10 fucking years).........i was pointing out the fucking liberal HYPOCRISY......
Then the law is hampering the free market, you shouldn't bother bringing it up when it suits the need. Like in your retarded signature.
Please speak in complete sentences.
It's not speech, it's written word, thunder dolt.
Best recourse is to simply not bank with those creeps.
if BofA chose not to bank for gays you would be out in full whining mode....
Owning a big gun to compensate for your tiny dick is a CHOICE, asshole.
Best recourse is to simply not bank with those creeps.
^^^ this.
Someone finally gets it.
Where does the 2nd amendment say anything about a right to bank at BankofAmerica? You people are seriously fucked in the head.
Uh. If somebody has lawful deposits in a bank, that bank doesn't have the right to suspend his account and deny access to his funds.
Banks aren't obligated to make all of your funds available at all times, I guess you've never read the fine print when opening a bank account.
so a bank can discriminate against a customer's 2nd Amendment Rights....?
Where does the 2nd amendment say anything about a right to bank at BankofAmerica? You people are seriously fucked in the head.
Uh. If somebody has lawful deposits in a bank, that bank doesn't have the right to suspend his account and deny access to his funds.
"The deposits were on hold for further review."
That is the issue.
Best recourse is to simply not bank with those creeps.
^^^ this.
Someone finally gets it.
No. You and he are drinking the piss. American Thinker and Daily Piss got their facts wrong, and you fell for it.
You are classic rubes.
Where does the 2nd amendment say anything about a right to bank at BankofAmerica? You people are seriously fucked in the head.
Uh. If somebody has lawful deposits in a bank, that bank doesn't have the right to suspend his account and deny access to his funds.
"The deposits were on hold for further review."
That is the issue.
Actually, they are allowed to do that. If there is a surge in the amount of cash flowing through a bank account, they can be held accountable if it turns out he is laundering drug money or terrorist money.
You can thank law-and-order politicians for that requirement. Go Patriot Act! Go Homeland Security!
The dumb shit is going to be shocked when the same thing happens to him at his next bank.
A blogger on the partisan site American Thinker is using a nine month old article from The Daily Pisser as his source for this information.
This is a new one. You are thinking of the stunt they pulled last April.
This is not a new one. The OP quote is talking about the one from last April. The McMillan thing was last April.
In the other case discussed in the OP link, which is a new case, BofA did not close the gun dealer's account. The bank saw a surge in his pass-through and are doing due diligence to ensure he is not breaking the law or laundering money.
Uh. If somebody has lawful deposits in a bank, that bank doesn't have the right to suspend his account and deny access to his funds.
"The deposits were on hold for further review."
That is the issue.
Actually, they are allowed to do that. If there is a surge in the amount of cash flowing through a bank account, they can be held accountable if it turns out he is laundering drug money or terrorist money.
You can thank law-and-order politicians for that requirement. Go Patriot Act! Go Homeland Security!
The gun seller was doing internet sales. Rather difficult to do on a Cash Basis, bub.