- Sep 16, 2012
- 66,940
- 62,714
- 3,605
See?You have the opposite of integrity, you a conspiracy theorist who believes whatever you're told if your feelings want you to believe it. In basic english comp, you're considered an unreliable source. There's a reason for that, and there's a reason for your poor reputation - hint: it's not because you're vigorously accurateIOW. . . I'm much more often right, you are nearly always wrong.I dont consider your posts, same way I don't consider gateway pundit. You have a propensity to believe bullshit based on 6 degrees of kevin bacon-type reasoning. You function on illogic.QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.
Agreed.
After the media come out and explained what that was. . .
And the statistical anomaly was explained.
. . . and as I told you and Toro yesterday about the fact, that if these votes were legit, then Peters should win, not James. . . was I not right?
Judges dismiss Trump claims in Georgia, Michigan
![]()
With counting winding down, Trump team pushes legal fights
The rulings came as Democrat Joe Biden inched closer to the 270 Electoral College votes needed to win the White House.www.woodtv.com
In sales and media, they literally write manuals for manipulating dupes like you.
. . . except for when I am incorrect? I admit it.
You would never do the same, you are a propagandist, just like your friend, LL.
I have integrity, something someone in your field doesn't have the luxury to have.
In sale and media, it is all about deception and fraud.
Man. . . that would suck.
No wonder you are always angry.
That is where you are factually incorrect.
I do my own thinking, your projecting. You are the one that believes what ever the MSM tell you.
I figured out that Peters should beat James before it was ever announced based on my education and training.
. . and here you are, rather than apologizing, thanking me for informing you of reality before you were told by your corporate press and government sources, you are attacking me.
The facts speak otherwise.
Sorry, your name calling is useless, you aren't doing yourself any favors.