Balkan

[Mortimer]

Albanians are allies of the USA in Balkans
They are allies of the US in balkans. How that came to be and what is the history behind it? I mean the origins of that alliance? Also serbia made a mistake not becoming ally of the USA. They put trust in soviets, that was a mistake.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

is german your first language?

 

[Mortimer]

is german your first language?

Serbian is my first language as in the language i learned first when I was born. But I learned as small kid german too. And I speak also fluent german.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

is german your first language?

Serbian is my first language as in the language i learned first when I was born. But I learned as small kid german too. And I speak also fluent german.

your English is good also

 

[Mortimer]

is german your first language?

Serbian is my first language as in the language i learned first when I was born. But I learned as small kid german too. And I speak also fluent german.

your English is good also

Thank you

 

[ESay]

Albanians are allies of the USA in Balkans
They are allies of the US in balkans. How that came to be and what is the history behind it? I mean the origins of that alliance? Also serbia made a mistake not becoming ally of the USA. They put trust in soviets, that was a mistake.

It is quite easy. The US didn't want Yugoslavia's existence. I think I don't need to explain why. So, the Albanians came as allies to destroy the remnants of what used to be Yugoslavia. The goal is achieved, everyone is happy. Well, almost everyone.

 

[Litwin]

Albanians are allies of the USA in Balkans
They are allies of the US in balkans. How that came to be and what is the history behind it? I mean the origins of that alliance? Also serbia made a mistake not becoming ally of the USA. They put trust in soviets, that was a mistake.

good questions.

1) Albanians are more then 100 years Balkan´s anti - maskal wall , traditional Western ally against Muscovite imperial ambitions

2) when it comes to Serbs, its much more complicated. they have punched above wight for 150 years. during Tito´s times Yugoslavia was the main anti - soviet wall, than Serbs decided to go greater Serbia way and annex as much as possible ex- Yugoslavian territory . and union with Muscovite empire is the mostly virtual

 

[Litwin]

Albanians are allies of the USA in Balkans
They are allies of the US in balkans. How that came to be and what is the history behind it? I mean the origins of that alliance? Also serbia made a mistake not becoming ally of the USA. They put trust in soviets, that was a mistake.

It is quite easy. The US didn't want Yugoslavia's existence. I think I don't need to explain why. So, the Albanians came as allies to destroy the remnants of what used to be Yugoslavia. The goal is achieved, everyone is happy. Well, almost everyone.

"US didn't want Yugoslavia's existence. "

1) wrong, USA protected Yugoslavia's existence for 55 years
2) the Serbs dont have the volume to dominate Croatians , so there is no chance of Serbian Yugoslavia

 

[ESay]

Albanians are allies of the USA in Balkans
They are allies of the US in balkans. How that came to be and what is the history behind it? I mean the origins of that alliance? Also serbia made a mistake not becoming ally of the USA. They put trust in soviets, that was a mistake.

It is quite easy. The US didn't want Yugoslavia's existence. I think I don't need to explain why. So, the Albanians came as allies to destroy the remnants of what used to be Yugoslavia. The goal is achieved, everyone is happy. Well, almost everyone.

"US didn't want Yugoslavia's existence. "

1) wrong, USA protected Yugoslavia's existence for 55 years
2) the Serbs dont have the volume to dominate Croatians , so there is no chance of Serbian Yugoslavia

Yugoslavia belonged to a socialist bloc, dude. The relatevily independent politics it followed was thanks to Tito and its geographical place. Don't write nonsense.

Croatians maybe. But the Serbs dominance may well be ensured over Serbia, Montenegro, North Macedonia and the parts of Bosnia.

 

[Litwin]

Albanians are allies of the USA in Balkans
They are allies of the US in balkans. How that came to be and what is the history behind it? I mean the origins of that alliance? Also serbia made a mistake not becoming ally of the USA. They put trust in soviets, that was a mistake.

It is quite easy. The US didn't want Yugoslavia's existence. I think I don't need to explain why. So, the Albanians came as allies to destroy the remnants of what used to be Yugoslavia. The goal is achieved, everyone is happy. Well, almost everyone.

"US didn't want Yugoslavia's existence. "

1) wrong, USA protected Yugoslavia's existence for 55 years
2) the Serbs dont have the volume to dominate Croatians , so there is no chance of Serbian Yugoslavia

Yugoslavia belonged to a socialist bloc, dude. The relatevily independent politics it followed was thanks to Tito and its geographical place. Don't write nonsense.

Croatians maybe. But the Serbs dominance may well be ensured over Serbia, Montenegro, North Macedonia and the parts of Bosnia.

"Yugoslavia belonged to a socialist bloc," No....

The Life and Death of Yugoslav Socialism - Jacobin

https://jacobinmag.com › 2017/07 › yugoslav-socialism-tito-self-managem...
Jul 17, 2017 - Yugoslavia's “self-managed” socialism appeared to be a real alternative ... Separated from the Soviet-aligned bloc, Josip Broz Tito and his party ... and authority at the enterprise level still belonged to state-appointed directors.

 

[Litwin]

Albanians are allies of the USA in Balkans
They are allies of the US in balkans. How that came to be and what is the history behind it? I mean the origins of that alliance? Also serbia made a mistake not becoming ally of the USA. They put trust in soviets, that was a mistake.

It is quite easy. The US didn't want Yugoslavia's existence. I think I don't need to explain why. So, the Albanians came as allies to destroy the remnants of what used to be Yugoslavia. The goal is achieved, everyone is happy. Well, almost everyone.

Croatians maybe. But the Serbs dominance may well be ensured over Serbia, Montenegro, North Macedonia and the parts of Bosnia.

yes , it calls the bigger Serbia, and EU will never allow this , its just an impossible task for Serbs in 21c.

 

[ESay]

Albanians are allies of the USA in Balkans
They are allies of the US in balkans. How that came to be and what is the history behind it? I mean the origins of that alliance? Also serbia made a mistake not becoming ally of the USA. They put trust in soviets, that was a mistake.

It is quite easy. The US didn't want Yugoslavia's existence. I think I don't need to explain why. So, the Albanians came as allies to destroy the remnants of what used to be Yugoslavia. The goal is achieved, everyone is happy. Well, almost everyone.

"US didn't want Yugoslavia's existence. "

1) wrong, USA protected Yugoslavia's existence for 55 years
2) the Serbs dont have the volume to dominate Croatians , so there is no chance of Serbian Yugoslavia

Yugoslavia belonged to a socialist bloc, dude. The relatevily independent politics it followed was thanks to Tito and its geographical place. Don't write nonsense.

Croatians maybe. But the Serbs dominance may well be ensured over Serbia, Montenegro, North Macedonia and the parts of Bosnia.

"Yugoslavia belonged to a socialist bloc," No....

The Life and Death of Yugoslav Socialism - Jacobin

https://jacobinmag.com › 2017/07 › yugoslav-socialism-tito-self-managem...
Jul 17, 2017 - Yugoslavia's “self-managed” socialism appeared to be a real alternative ... Separated from the Soviet-aligned bloc, Josip Broz Tito and his party ... and authority at the enterprise level still belonged to state-appointed directors.

Cute pics, but it doesn't change the fact. Yugoslavia didn't belong to the Warsaw pact, but it is pointless to argue that it was socialist and was much more aligned with the USSR than with the West.

 

[ESay]

Albanians are allies of the USA in Balkans
They are allies of the US in balkans. How that came to be and what is the history behind it? I mean the origins of that alliance? Also serbia made a mistake not becoming ally of the USA. They put trust in soviets, that was a mistake.

It is quite easy. The US didn't want Yugoslavia's existence. I think I don't need to explain why. So, the Albanians came as allies to destroy the remnants of what used to be Yugoslavia. The goal is achieved, everyone is happy. Well, almost everyone.

Croatians maybe. But the Serbs dominance may well be ensured over Serbia, Montenegro, North Macedonia and the parts of Bosnia.

yes , it calls the bigger Serbia, and EU will never allow this , its just an impossible task for Serbs in 21c.

It was not about the EU. And of course the Serbs aren't able to do this now. And it was the main task of the Yugoslavia war in 1999. Nobody gave a shit about Albanians, they were just a useful tool.

 

[Litwin]

Albanians are allies of the USA in Balkans
They are allies of the US in balkans. How that came to be and what is the history behind it? I mean the origins of that alliance? Also serbia made a mistake not becoming ally of the USA. They put trust in soviets, that was a mistake.

It is quite easy. The US didn't want Yugoslavia's existence. I think I don't need to explain why. So, the Albanians came as allies to destroy the remnants of what used to be Yugoslavia. The goal is achieved, everyone is happy. Well, almost everyone.

"US didn't want Yugoslavia's existence. "

1) wrong, USA protected Yugoslavia's existence for 55 years
2) the Serbs dont have the volume to dominate Croatians , so there is no chance of Serbian Yugoslavia

Yugoslavia belonged to a socialist bloc, dude. The relatevily independent politics it followed was thanks to Tito and its geographical place. Don't write nonsense.

Croatians maybe. But the Serbs dominance may well be ensured over Serbia, Montenegro, North Macedonia and the parts of Bosnia.

"Yugoslavia belonged to a socialist bloc," No....

The Life and Death of Yugoslav Socialism - Jacobin

https://jacobinmag.com › 2017/07 › yugoslav-socialism-tito-self-managem...
Jul 17, 2017 - Yugoslavia's “self-managed” socialism appeared to be a real alternative ... Separated from the Soviet-aligned bloc, Josip Broz Tito and his party ... and authority at the enterprise level still belonged to state-appointed directors.

Cute pics, but it doesn't change the fact. Yugoslavia didn't belong to the Warsaw pact, but it is pointless to argue that it was socialist and was much more aligned with the USSR than with the West.

"it was socialist and was much more aligned with the USSR" no it was not, Litvak dont you know that you have bad tamper ? how many time your wife already told you that ?

here we go, anti-Yugoslavian USSR propaganda

The Background of the Soviet-Yugoslav Dispute - jstor

https://www.jstor.org › stable
by AB Ulam - ‎1951 - ‎Cited by 4 - ‎Related articles
T HE conflict between Stalin's Russia and Tito's Yugoslavia is rem- iniscent of a quarrel ..... The story of a vast anti-Russian plot presided over by Tito and clique is nothing but a clumsily constructed propaganda device how reasonable is it to ...

 

[ESay]

It is quite easy. The US didn't want Yugoslavia's existence. I think I don't need to explain why. So, the Albanians came as allies to destroy the remnants of what used to be Yugoslavia. The goal is achieved, everyone is happy. Well, almost everyone.

"US didn't want Yugoslavia's existence. "

1) wrong, USA protected Yugoslavia's existence for 55 years
2) the Serbs dont have the volume to dominate Croatians , so there is no chance of Serbian Yugoslavia

Yugoslavia belonged to a socialist bloc, dude. The relatevily independent politics it followed was thanks to Tito and its geographical place. Don't write nonsense.

Croatians maybe. But the Serbs dominance may well be ensured over Serbia, Montenegro, North Macedonia and the parts of Bosnia.

"Yugoslavia belonged to a socialist bloc," No....

The Life and Death of Yugoslav Socialism - Jacobin

https://jacobinmag.com › 2017/07 › yugoslav-socialism-tito-self-managem...
Jul 17, 2017 - Yugoslavia's “self-managed” socialism appeared to be a real alternative ... Separated from the Soviet-aligned bloc, Josip Broz Tito and his party ... and authority at the enterprise level still belonged to state-appointed directors.

Cute pics, but it doesn't change the fact. Yugoslavia didn't belong to the Warsaw pact, but it is pointless to argue that it was socialist and was much more aligned with the USSR than with the West.

"it was socialist and was much more aligned with the USSR" no it was not, Litvak dont you know that you have bad tamper ? how many time your wife already told you that ?

here we go, anti-Yugoslavian USSR propaganda

The Background of the Soviet-Yugoslav Dispute - jstor

https://www.jstor.org › stable
by AB Ulam - ‎1951 - ‎Cited by 4 - ‎Related articles
T HE conflict between Stalin's Russia and Tito's Yugoslavia is rem- iniscent of a quarrel ..... The story of a vast anti-Russian plot presided over by Tito and clique is nothing but a clumsily constructed propaganda device how reasonable is it to ...

Dude, you are boring. There were various stages of Soviet-Yugoslavian relationships. Your pictures are belonged to the Stalins times. Stalin and Tito didn't get along too well. But the USSR isn't only Stalin.

 

[Litwin]

@But the USSR isn't only Stalin.

do you agree that Yugoslavia has never been occupied by soviet - muscovite hordes like all "soviet block European countries " were ? did not have ussr bases , etc.?

 

[Bleipriester]

Albanians are allies of the USA in Balkans

Seems to be a great Idea. Ask the Kurds.

 

[ESay]

@But the USSR isn't only Stalin.

do you agree that Yugoslavia has never been occupied by soviet - muscovite hordes like all "soviet block European countries " were ? did not have ussr bases , etc.?

If I remember correctly, it was the Soviet troops which liberated Yugoslavia from Nazis. But there were no Soviet bases there afterwards.

 

[Litwin]

by the way

@But the USSR isn't only Stalin.

do you agree that Yugoslavia has never been occupied by soviet - muscovite hordes like all "soviet block European countries " were ? did not have ussr bases , etc.?

If I remember correctly, it was the Soviet troops which liberated Yugoslavia from Nazis. But there were no Soviet bases there afterwards.

"If I remember correctly, it was the Soviet troops which " liberated"
no, you are wrong, Croat commie Tito and his commie - leftists partisan armies (serb dominated) made their own empire with some support both west (US/UK) and Koba, Tito crushed Croat , greater Albanian - Bulgarian, and Serbian, national states on the way .

. with other words without stalinist -satanic occupation . thats why Yugoslavia was always way much more funny place than gray sovok

 

[Litwin]

and you know when it comes to maskal folk , "liberated" is just synonym to the world occupied