Backwards Anderson Cooper Depriving a Child of Its Mother

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Anderson Cooper never gives us the straight News

 

[Syriusly]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Oh, don't start this crap again. There are and have been plenty of kids raised by only one parent, and I'm sure that Cooper will have a lot of help. Plus, he's much, much more interested in being a parent than some parents are. He volunteered to become a parent and had to arrange it, so it is highly unlikely that he will become one of those parents who, even if living with the other parent, spend more of their time on leisure activities and with friends or outside lovers than they spend raising their children.

He's interested only in training a new generation of homosexuals. Men who want to be fathers marry the woman they want to be the mother.

How does one "train" kids to be homosexual? I've never seen a study that shows children with gay parents having a higher rate of homosexuality than the regular population.

Most people marry who they love. And wanting children with that person is normal.

Considering that the vast, vast majority of all people were born to heterosexual parents, and raised by heterosexual parents who generally wanted to raise heterosexual children- I would say that 'training' children to be attracted to one gender or another doesn't appear to be working too well.

Parents have been duped into allowing their children to get their moral training from the socialists in the public schools. I remember a discussion with my granddaughter, after her high school graduation but before she started college, about a story on the news on TV. The story was about a woman who had a wife... In discussing the story, I referred to the woman as a lesbian. My granddaughter, and her visiting friend, were shocked that I would assume that a woman with a wife was a lesbian. What kind of right-wing monster was I?

Of course I was stunned. How in the world did I get that wrong? They explained to me that the woman might be bisexual. I had no right to assume any person's "gender" or sexual preference.

So, you're right. We're letting schools break down the family and destroy our values and causing real confusion in our children. It's something we'd better fix soon or the world as we know it is over.

Technically, your granddaughter was right.

But I question why it matters. The woman is married to another woman. Why is it a requirement that we categorize them as gay or bisexual? Unless you intend to try and seduce them, their sexual orientation doesn't matter. Or it shouldn't.

‘Best friends’ doesn’t earn tax breaks from the government. Homo marriage is as irrelevant as best friends so you defeat any argument for ‘legal’ homo marriage.

Marriages entered into by two persons are legal, so you don't have to put it in quotes.

Marriage is a concept. You can marry a blade of grass. It’s between you and the blade of grass. ‘Legal’ status forces everyone to recognize and subsidize your marriage. That’s the distinction.

Marriage is a legal concept. Legal status forces everyone to recognize and 'subsidize' your marriage- regardless of whether we approve of your marriage or not.

Many Americans do not approve of divorced people remarrying. Others don't approve of mixed races or mixed religions marrying each other. And others don't approve of same gender couples marrying each other.

Regardless- those are all legal marriages because we treat all of those couples equally.

If you don't like 'subsidizing' marriages(a dubious claim that marriages are actually subsidized)- then advocate for ending legal marriages and any financial 'benefits' that may come from them(as someone who has been married almost 30 years, I haven't seen my subsidy yet.....)

 

[Syriusly]

Anderson Cooper Vanderbilt is not mentally stable...in my opinion.

Since he saw his brother jumping from the balcony to his death.....he was never the same, and yes it is very sad and traumatic....he has been haunted all his life by his brother suicide.

He chose the wrong profession..... he should have not chosen journalism.

Donald Trump is not mentally stable in my opinion.

And he certainly chose the wrong profession when he ran for President.....he was so much better at his previous profession of con-man and reality TV show host.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Oh, don't start this crap again. There are and have been plenty of kids raised by only one parent, and I'm sure that Cooper will have a lot of help. Plus, he's much, much more interested in being a parent than some parents are. He volunteered to become a parent and had to arrange it, so it is highly unlikely that he will become one of those parents who, even if living with the other parent, spend more of their time on leisure activities and with friends or outside lovers than they spend raising their children.

He's interested only in training a new generation of homosexuals. Men who want to be fathers marry the woman they want to be the mother.

How does one "train" kids to be homosexual? I've never seen a study that shows children with gay parents having a higher rate of homosexuality than the regular population.

Most people marry who they love. And wanting children with that person is normal.

Considering that the vast, vast majority of all people were born to heterosexual parents, and raised by heterosexual parents who generally wanted to raise heterosexual children- I would say that 'training' children to be attracted to one gender or another doesn't appear to be working too well.

Parents have been duped into allowing their children to get their moral training from the socialists in the public schools. I remember a discussion with my granddaughter, after her high school graduation but before she started college, about a story on the news on TV. The story was about a woman who had a wife... In discussing the story, I referred to the woman as a lesbian. My granddaughter, and her visiting friend, were shocked that I would assume that a woman with a wife was a lesbian. What kind of right-wing monster was I?

Of course I was stunned. How in the world did I get that wrong? They explained to me that the woman might be bisexual. I had no right to assume any person's "gender" or sexual preference.

So, you're right. We're letting schools break down the family and destroy our values and causing real confusion in our children. It's something we'd better fix soon or the world as we know it is over.

Technically, your granddaughter was right.

But I question why it matters. The woman is married to another woman. Why is it a requirement that we categorize them as gay or bisexual? Unless you intend to try and seduce them, their sexual orientation doesn't matter. Or it shouldn't.

‘Best friends’ doesn’t earn tax breaks from the government. Homo marriage is as irrelevant as best friends so you defeat any argument for ‘legal’ homo marriage.

Marriages entered into by two persons are legal, so you don't have to put it in quotes.

Marriage is a concept. You can marry a blade of grass. It’s between you and the blade of grass. ‘Legal’ status forces everyone to recognize and subsidize your marriage. That’s the distinction.

Well. Yeah. A marriage has legal status. We are all "force[d]" to recognize and subsidize each other's marriages; your's, mine, trump's, pence's, even frankie graham's and falwell's. That's how it goes.

Why?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

As long as there is true love there I don't have a problem with same sex parents having adopted kids or kids through a surrogate. Let's be honest here, Kiddies...there are a lot of traditional couples that should NEVER be allowed to have a child because they're terrible parents. If Anderson Cooper turns out to be a good dad then more power to him!

The data is in and its post-1960’s leftist. Kids are best off with their actual two parents, their mother and father, which every human in history has had. Alternatives should only be last resort, not optional.

I'm a conservative actually. I just don't have an issue with same sex marriage. To be quite blunt...with all of the other fucked up things we have to deal with these days...people that love each other...no matter what their sexual orientation...is way down on my list of "problems"! Kids are best off in a setting where there are parents who love them...and god knows there are traditional marriages where a couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid!

You probably live in a mostly-non-Black neighborhood.

My neighbors on one side are both Hispanic...my neighbors on the other side are black and oriental. Across the street from me is a good ole boy from Alabama. We all get along just fine though. Good people are good people...all the racial shit is just that...SHIT!

So you live in a mostly non-black locale. That would mean that most of the families are structured (mom and dad) and you likely have low crime and better schools.

 

[Lysistrata]

I had the same thought when Richard Greer, age 69, just had his new son the other day. Even my grandfather decided that once he hit his 80s, he was not going to get a new dog.

How can anyone at that age even think about a new son? That is insane and they will both be in diapers about the same time. And I thought the same when old time Hollywood he men like Anthony Quinn and Mick Jagger, Steve Martin, Rod Stewart and Charlie Chaplin (fathered a child at 81)
had children well into their sixties and seventies and even beyond! Pure ego driven selfishness.

This is the one thing that I might agree with you. Men are biologically able to have a baby at what whatever age, but beyond their years ability to actually be a parent. trump has a kid of about 14 years of age, yet he is in his 70s, and even when younger, he didn't seem to be capable to feed, bathe, diaper, read bedtime stories to, attend school, and otherwise take care of his children personally. Our heroes, both men and women, are the front-liners, the boots on the ground. Both men and women can be there to take care of these babies and raise them up to adulthood, or not.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Disingenuous. The woman bearing the child got paid to have it.

WTF? What’s your point?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Anderson Cooper is 51- which is not a very unusual age to have a child- Trump was 59 when he became the father of Baron.

I think 51 is pushing it and 59 is definitely too old. But the wealthy can hire lots of help.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Oh, don't start this crap again. There are and have been plenty of kids raised by only one parent, and I'm sure that Cooper will have a lot of help. Plus, he's much, much more interested in being a parent than some parents are. He volunteered to become a parent and had to arrange it, so it is highly unlikely that he will become one of those parents who, even if living with the other parent, spend more of their time on leisure activities and with friends or outside lovers than they spend raising their children.

He's interested only in training a new generation of homosexuals. Men who want to be fathers marry the woman they want to be the mother.

How does one "train" kids to be homosexual? I've never seen a study that shows children with gay parents having a higher rate of homosexuality than the regular population.

Most people marry who they love. And wanting children with that person is normal.

Considering that the vast, vast majority of all people were born to heterosexual parents, and raised by heterosexual parents who generally wanted to raise heterosexual children- I would say that 'training' children to be attracted to one gender or another doesn't appear to be working too well.

Parents have been duped into allowing their children to get their moral training from the socialists in the public schools. I remember a discussion with my granddaughter, after her high school graduation but before she started college, about a story on the news on TV. The story was about a woman who had a wife... In discussing the story, I referred to the woman as a lesbian. My granddaughter, and her visiting friend, were shocked that I would assume that a woman with a wife was a lesbian. What kind of right-wing monster was I?

Of course I was stunned. How in the world did I get that wrong? They explained to me that the woman might be bisexual. I had no right to assume any person's "gender" or sexual preference.

So, you're right. We're letting schools break down the family and destroy our values and causing real confusion in our children. It's something we'd better fix soon or the world as we know it is over.

Technically, your granddaughter was right.

But I question why it matters. The woman is married to another woman. Why is it a requirement that we categorize them as gay or bisexual? Unless you intend to try and seduce them, their sexual orientation doesn't matter. Or it shouldn't.

‘Best friends’ doesn’t earn tax breaks from the government. Homo marriage is as irrelevant as best friends so you defeat any argument for ‘legal’ homo marriage.

Marriages entered into by two persons are legal, so you don't have to put it in quotes.

Marriage is a concept. You can marry a blade of grass. It’s between you and the blade of grass. ‘Legal’ status forces everyone to recognize and subsidize your marriage. That’s the distinction.

Marriage is a legal concept. Legal status forces everyone to recognize and 'subsidize' your marriage- regardless of whether we approve of your marriage or not.

Many Americans do not approve of divorced people remarrying. Others don't approve of mixed races or mixed religions marrying each other. And others don't approve of same gender couples marrying each other.

Regardless- those are all legal marriages because we treat all of those couples equally.

If you don't like 'subsidizing' marriages(a dubious claim that marriages are actually subsidized)- then advocate for ending legal marriages and any financial 'benefits' that may come from them(as someone who has been married almost 30 years, I haven't seen my subsidy yet.....)

‘Legal’ marriage is a legal construct. Marriage itself is a concept.

 

[Levant]

That's the sign of a true conservative. We may not like or agree with what another person does but we'll take to arms,. if necessary, to defend their right to do it.

What a load of bull. ...
I'm a conservative, but I'd never take up arms to defend the fudge packers right to raise up children in a homo pretend marriage.

That wasn't the context of my statement; the context of my statement was the right of homosexuals to marry. The post I responded to did not make the claim that a homosexual marriage was an ideal situation for raising children; he made the statement that it is far better than some heterosexual marriages. I'm one of 7 children.

I can tell you abuse stories that will give you nightmares... of the 7 of us, one is actually an attorney - but I don't think she's mentally stable, just the same. I'm a pretty successful IT guy, on my fourth successful career, actually. The rest have had disastrous lives including one suicide. In a heterosexual house with drunk and physically abusive parents.

The person I responded to didn't say, at least in that post, what he thought was the best, if there is a best, situation for children. I think that the best situation for raising successful, mentally stable, children is a home with two parents - a male-born father and a female-born mother. If Roshawn Markwees posts something disagreeing with that, and if it's interesting enough to debate, and if I am in the mood, I'll rebut it. But the post he made, which I agreed with, he was right.

Bottom line is, you're not really a conservative if you don't believe in protecting anyone from government overreach or government tyranny. Many people think they're conservatives when what they really are is authoritarian - as long as the government overreach goes your way. But when government overreach goes against you then you're suddenly conservative.

 

[Lysistrata]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Oh, don't start this crap again. There are and have been plenty of kids raised by only one parent, and I'm sure that Cooper will have a lot of help. Plus, he's much, much more interested in being a parent than some parents are. He volunteered to become a parent and had to arrange it, so it is highly unlikely that he will become one of those parents who, even if living with the other parent, spend more of their time on leisure activities and with friends or outside lovers than they spend raising their children.

He's interested only in training a new generation of homosexuals. Men who want to be fathers marry the woman they want to be the mother.

How does one "train" kids to be homosexual? I've never seen a study that shows children with gay parents having a higher rate of homosexuality than the regular population.

Most people marry who they love. And wanting children with that person is normal.

Considering that the vast, vast majority of all people were born to heterosexual parents, and raised by heterosexual parents who generally wanted to raise heterosexual children- I would say that 'training' children to be attracted to one gender or another doesn't appear to be working too well.

Parents have been duped into allowing their children to get their moral training from the socialists in the public schools. I remember a discussion with my granddaughter, after her high school graduation but before she started college, about a story on the news on TV. The story was about a woman who had a wife... In discussing the story, I referred to the woman as a lesbian. My granddaughter, and her visiting friend, were shocked that I would assume that a woman with a wife was a lesbian. What kind of right-wing monster was I?

Of course I was stunned. How in the world did I get that wrong? They explained to me that the woman might be bisexual. I had no right to assume any person's "gender" or sexual preference.

So, you're right. We're letting schools break down the family and destroy our values and causing real confusion in our children. It's something we'd better fix soon or the world as we know it is over.

Technically, your granddaughter was right.

But I question why it matters. The woman is married to another woman. Why is it a requirement that we categorize them as gay or bisexual? Unless you intend to try and seduce them, their sexual orientation doesn't matter. Or it shouldn't.

‘Best friends’ doesn’t earn tax breaks from the government. Homo marriage is as irrelevant as best friends so you defeat any argument for ‘legal’ homo marriage.

Marriages entered into by two persons are legal, so you don't have to put it in quotes.

Marriage is a concept. You can marry a blade of grass. It’s between you and the blade of grass. ‘Legal’ status forces everyone to recognize and subsidize your marriage. That’s the distinction.

Well. Yeah. A marriage has legal status. We are all "force[d]" to recognize and subsidize each other's marriages; your's, mine, trump's, pence's, even frankie graham's and falwell's. That's how it goes.

Why?

Why ask me? Donald and his third wife want their marriage recognized, even after his second wife who gave birth to his child before he "married" her. This pence and wants his relationship with this karen to be recognized and supported. You tell me.

 

[Levant]

I had the same thought when Richard Greer, age 69, just had his new son the other day. Even my grandfather decided that once he hit his 80s, he was not going to get a new dog.

How can anyone at that age even think about a new son? That is insane and they will both be in diapers about the same time. And I thought the same when old time Hollywood he men like Anthony Quinn and Mick Jagger, Steve Martin, Rod Stewart and Charlie Chaplin (fathered a child at 81)
had children well into their sixties and seventies and even beyond! Pure ego driven selfishness.

This is the one thing that I might agree with you. Men are biologically able to have a baby at what whatever age, but beyond their years ability to actually be a parent. trump has a kid of about 14 years of age, yet he is in his 70s, and even when younger, he didn't seem to be capable to feed, bathe, diaper, read bedtime stories to, attend school, and otherwise take care of his children personally. Our heroes, both men and women, are the front-liners, the boots on the ground. Both men and women can be there to take care of these babies and raise them up to adulthood, or not.

There are a lot of ways to raise a child - a lot of good, healthy, ways. It's not ideal in my opinion, but a lot of families have been very successful with two working parents and childcare or other family or even paid help at home. Other families, for thousands of years, mothers worked at home and raised little ones while the men hunted - there are just parts of natural child raising that the men couldn't do. There are hundreds, maybe thousands or millions, of variations in between. There have been successes and failures in every approach. The greatest differentiating factor is the dedication of the parents and their love for their children.

I generally think that homosexuals have children to redefine the American family. I could be totally wrong. Even if I am mostly right, there are probably exceptions. If Anderson Cooper truly loves his son and doesn't expose his son to sex, just like it should be for heterosexual couples, then there's a chance that his son grows up healthy, both physically and emotionally. My preference would be that homosexual couples choose not to have children but I can't say that there are no child-rearing successes from homosexual relationships.

For my family, my wife chose to leave her career and stay home to raise the children. Did it work perfectly? No. But our kids are in their 40s and and none are on drugs and none are in jail. We're pretty pleased with the outcome.

 

[Levant]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Oh, don't start this crap again. There are and have been plenty of kids raised by only one parent, and I'm sure that Cooper will have a lot of help. Plus, he's much, much more interested in being a parent than some parents are. He volunteered to become a parent and had to arrange it, so it is highly unlikely that he will become one of those parents who, even if living with the other parent, spend more of their time on leisure activities and with friends or outside lovers than they spend raising their children.

He's interested only in training a new generation of homosexuals. Men who want to be fathers marry the woman they want to be the mother.

How does one "train" kids to be homosexual? I've never seen a study that shows children with gay parents having a higher rate of homosexuality than the regular population.

Most people marry who they love. And wanting children with that person is normal.

Considering that the vast, vast majority of all people were born to heterosexual parents, and raised by heterosexual parents who generally wanted to raise heterosexual children- I would say that 'training' children to be attracted to one gender or another doesn't appear to be working too well.

Parents have been duped into allowing their children to get their moral training from the socialists in the public schools. I remember a discussion with my granddaughter, after her high school graduation but before she started college, about a story on the news on TV. The story was about a woman who had a wife... In discussing the story, I referred to the woman as a lesbian. My granddaughter, and her visiting friend, were shocked that I would assume that a woman with a wife was a lesbian. What kind of right-wing monster was I?

Of course I was stunned. How in the world did I get that wrong? They explained to me that the woman might be bisexual. I had no right to assume any person's "gender" or sexual preference.

So, you're right. We're letting schools break down the family and destroy our values and causing real confusion in our children. It's something we'd better fix soon or the world as we know it is over.

Technically, your granddaughter was right.

But I question why it matters. The woman is married to another woman. Why is it a requirement that we categorize them as gay or bisexual? Unless you intend to try and seduce them, their sexual orientation doesn't matter. Or it shouldn't.

‘Best friends’ doesn’t earn tax breaks from the government. Homo marriage is as irrelevant as best friends so you defeat any argument for ‘legal’ homo marriage.

Marriages entered into by two persons are legal, so you don't have to put it in quotes.

Marriage is a concept. You can marry a blade of grass. It’s between you and the blade of grass. ‘Legal’ status forces everyone to recognize and subsidize your marriage. That’s the distinction.

Marriage is a legal concept. Legal status forces everyone to recognize and 'subsidize' your marriage- regardless of whether we approve of your marriage or not.

Many Americans do not approve of divorced people remarrying. Others don't approve of mixed races or mixed religions marrying each other. And others don't approve of same gender couples marrying each other.

Regardless- those are all legal marriages because we treat all of those couples equally.

If you don't like 'subsidizing' marriages(a dubious claim that marriages are actually subsidized)- then advocate for ending legal marriages and any financial 'benefits' that may come from them(as someone who has been married almost 30 years, I haven't seen my subsidy yet.....)

‘Legal’ marriage is a legal construct. Marriage itself is a concept.

It's a concept created in religion but founded in semi-monogamy (monogamy for the woman, not necessarily for the men) because men did not want to have the fruits of their labors used to feed children fathered by other men... But, still, it's a religious practice and the government should stay out of it.

If there are tax breaks for two earners in the same household, their sex or marital status should not be part of it. If a company provides insurance for a spouse, then why not any partner or adults living in the same house?

The marriage part, the religious part, should only be between the married and the church, as long as the married are consenting adults.

 

[Levant]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

I am more concerned that he waited until he was so old to have the kid. Kid could be an orphan before it graduates college

.....he's 52? when the kid is 14 he'll be to old to be an efficient father/''mother''--like a lot of these jackasses having kids when they are 60 and 70

So this is the reason you don't like him being a parent? Because he is too old? I mean, its not like the tax payer will have to care for the child.

hahahhahahahah WRONG
..I'm not saying I don't like him for that
...I'm stating he cannot be an efficient/good/etc father because of it
....it's close----these bastards that have kids when they are 60 are jackasses---it takes time and effort to raise kids ....52 is still a little too late
....I'm in my years but in great shape--still I might be taxed if I had a 10 or 14 year old driving them around to ballgames/etc .....
...also--plain and simple--if you believe in evolution or creation, kids were not meant to be raised by 2 men

I knew a girl who was an unexpected pregnancy when her mom was 50 and her dad was 53. When we were graduating college and all trying to get careers going, she was stuck going back to take care of her parents in their terminal decline years. It was unfair to her to not to get to have a life of her own until later than most people.

Unfair? How so? Was it unfair when her parents raised her? Changed her diapers, wiped her ass? Was it unfair when they worked their asses off to put a roof over her head? Was it unfair when they paid to send her to college?

Actually, they might have done her a favor. She'll have that caring-for-mom-and-dad phase over younger in life and while you're caring for your parents she'll be travelling the world. It's a task most children have to do (some, selfishly, refuse the task). Since this girl's parents stayed around to get her through college then it seems that they met their responsibility. On the other hand, they could have aborted her since she was an accident in their 50s. That probably would have been more fair... I guess they should have moved to Virginia about the time she was graduating college - the governor there is pushing for post-partem abortions... Perhaps her parents could have aborted her for the clear mental and emotional flaw of being ungrateful.

 

[Levant]

You are not a conservative. You are a hate-mongering asshole. There is a difference.

There is no reason to be rude. ...

You must be a leftist, snowflake, hate-mongering asshole - considering how much you dislike the truth.

 

[Levant]

Yes, I was. I have many friends and one family member that are gay or lesbian. And you gave your opinion like it was fact. It is not.

I am sorry to hear you choose to be surrounded by mentally ill perverts. But I guess it's your prerogative to live that way.
As for me, I don't know any homo's, nor do I want to. They are dangerously deranged and have a propensity to carry deadly diseases and infections. ...

Well, you don't have to have sex with them... And guess what? You know some homosexuals. You may not know you know homosexuals but you do.

 

[Levant]

I find them to be much better friends than hate-mongers who judge based on opinions rather than facts.

Preferring not to be around mentally ill fudge packers isn't hate. It's just a safety issue. They are prone to violence, and are known to randomly attack people opposed to their perverted lifestyle. ...

There is too much violence among heterosexuals (you know, men and women) to take your comment seriously. Why do you think that countries across the world have had to establish shelters for people (mostly women) fleeing heterosexual abuse? Why do nations like India have such a problem with violence among heterosexuals, including rape and murder?

Bullshit. Homosexuals are far more violent.

Do you have proof of this? No you don't.

 

[Levant]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Oh, don't start this crap again. There are and have been plenty of kids raised by only one parent, and I'm sure that Cooper will have a lot of help. Plus, he's much, much more interested in being a parent than some parents are. He volunteered to become a parent and had to arrange it, so it is highly unlikely that he will become one of those parents who, even if living with the other parent, spend more of their time on leisure activities and with friends or outside lovers than they spend raising their children.

He's interested only in training a new generation of homosexuals. Men who want to be fathers marry the woman they want to be the mother.

How does one "train" kids to be homosexual? I've never seen a study that shows children with gay parents having a higher rate of homosexuality than the regular population.

Most people marry who they love. And wanting children with that person is normal.

Considering that the vast, vast majority of all people were born to heterosexual parents, and raised by heterosexual parents who generally wanted to raise heterosexual children- I would say that 'training' children to be attracted to one gender or another doesn't appear to be working too well.

Parents have been duped into allowing their children to get their moral training from the socialists in the public schools. I remember a discussion with my granddaughter, after her high school graduation but before she started college, about a story on the news on TV. The story was about a woman who had a wife... In discussing the story, I referred to the woman as a lesbian. My granddaughter, and her visiting friend, were shocked that I would assume that a woman with a wife was a lesbian. What kind of right-wing monster was I?

Of course I was stunned. How in the world did I get that wrong? They explained to me that the woman might be bisexual. I had no right to assume any person's "gender" or sexual preference.

So, you're right. We're letting schools break down the family and destroy our values and causing real confusion in our children. It's something we'd better fix soon or the world as we know it is over.

Technically, your granddaughter was right.

But I question why it matters. The woman is married to another woman. Why is it a requirement that we categorize them as gay or bisexual? Unless you intend to try and seduce them, their sexual orientation doesn't matter. Or it shouldn't.

‘Best friends’ doesn’t earn tax breaks from the government. Homo marriage is as irrelevant as best friends so you defeat any argument for ‘legal’ homo marriage.

Marriages entered into by two persons are legal, so you don't have to put it in quotes.

Marriage is a concept. You can marry a blade of grass. It’s between you and the blade of grass. ‘Legal’ status forces everyone to recognize and subsidize your marriage. That’s the distinction.

Therein lies the problem with government involvement in marriage.

 

[Levant]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

As long as there is true love there I don't have a problem with same sex parents having adopted kids or kids through a surrogate. Let's be honest here, Kiddies...there are a lot of traditional couples that should NEVER be allowed to have a child because they're terrible parents. If Anderson Cooper turns out to be a good dad then more power to him!

The data is in and its post-1960’s leftist. Kids are best off with their actual two parents, their mother and father, which every human in history has had. Alternatives should only be last resort, not optional.

I'm a conservative actually. I just don't have an issue with same sex marriage. To be quite blunt...with all of the other fucked up things we have to deal with these days...people that love each other...no matter what their sexual orientation...is way down on my list of "problems"! Kids are best off in a setting where there are parents who love them...and god knows there are traditional marriages where a couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid!

...and there are gay marriages where the couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid
..you think just because they are gay they will be better at it?

Depression and same-sex parenting

New study finds adult children of same-sex parents are twice as likely to be depressed

world.wng.org

Facts About Suicide - The Trevor Project

Suicide is the second leading cause of death among young people aged 10 to 24.

www.thetrevorproject.org

And there are straight marriages where the couple shouldn't be allowed to have a house plant let alone a kid.

Yet I don't see you starting any threads about any of those couples.

You should. It never hurts to have a good discussion on domestic violence.

 

[harmonica]

..and they brainwash their kids that they are VICTIMS/whiners/etc

I have not heard of any gay or lesbian parent say anything like that.

jesus christ!! it's like the blacks chronically brainwashing their kids that they are VICTIMS
...I had a thread on this with examples
...you don't think they raise their kids telling them how they were/are bullied/etc???

Don't pretend that there is no racism. Just the other day, a USMB poster referred to an adult American woman as a "groid sow." I had to goggle it to even know what he meant. It was disgusting. No matter what demographic group one is, s/he still has to educate their children how to cope with these attacks. Women, people of many ethnic backgrounds, many religions, LGBTs, have all been attacked, and we all must educate our children in how to cope with this shit and not yield ourselves to these freaks or submit to them.

....hahhahahahah--sure there is..but NOWHERE near the amount from whites that blacks and the MSM says there is
.>AND,, there is a lot more racism from blacks, which the MSM and blacks hardly ever [ if at all ] talk about
..blacks commit hate crimes at TWICE the rate of whites = FACT