Auschwitz, the holy grail of liberalism

[Moonglow]

I'm confused. What does Auschwitz have to do with what you are ranting about?

Auschwitz could not have happened without a systematic disarmament of the people. You really had that hard of a time connecting those dots?

Auschwitz happened because people democratically elected someone that set up the camp....

 

[Pete7469]

An armed society is an uncivilized society, it is only the cowardly who find courage in a gun. Our daily shootings place America right alongside the backward nations of the world.

"Unfortunately for LaPierre et al., the notion that Hitler confiscated everyone’s guns is mostly bogus. And the ancillary claim that Jews could have stopped the Holocaust with more guns doesn’t make any sense at all if you think about it for more than a minute.

University of Chicago law professor Bernard Harcourt explored this myth in depth in a 2004 article published in the Fordham Law Review. As it turns out, the Weimar Republic, the German government that immediately preceded Hitler’s, actually had tougher gun laws than the Nazi regime. After its defeat in World War I, and agreeing to the harsh surrender terms laid out in the Treaty of Versailles, the German legislature in 1919 passed a law that effectively banned all private firearm possession, leading the government to confiscate guns already in circulation. In 1928, the Reichstag relaxed the regulation a bit, but put in place a strict registration regime that required citizens to acquire separate permits to own guns, sell them or carry them."

The Hitler gun control lie - Salon.com

The Hitler gun control lie

Besides, Omer Bartov, a historian at Brown University who studies the Third Reich, notes that the Jews probably wouldn’t have had much success fighting back. “Just imagine the Jews of Germany exercising the right to bear arms and fighting the SA, SS and the Wehrmacht. The [Russian] Red Army lost 7 million men fighting the Wehrmacht, despite its tanks and planes and artillery. The Jews with pistols and shotguns would have done better?” he told Salon."


Americans, never give up your guns: Plea from Communist Victims | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

To summarize:

blah blah blah salon.Com puke and a psuedo intellectual say guns would't have saved anyone.

Common sense, that is those of us who have any, tells you that the resources involved with rounding up millions of households barricaded with armed people would have required the destruction of cities and the use of resources that would have turned every Jewish community into Stalingrad.

The Nazi's lost Stalingrad asshole.

 

[Moonglow]

The guns would have done no good for those in Germany during Adolf...He was elected by the people that accepted his platform and policy...

 

[Pete7469]

Auschwitz happened because people democratically elected someone that set up the camp....

Democrooks do shit like that. That's why intelligent people promote republics.

 

[Pete7469]

You know who should have been better armed back then? Japanese Americans. What do you say to that?

By God what your rotten former moonbat messiah FDR did was criminal. The japs should have had weapons and resisted.

 

[sealybobo]

You know who should have been better armed back then? Japanese Americans. What do you say to that?

By God what your rotten former moonbat messiah FDR did was criminal. The japs should have had weapons and resisted.

So you think that would have worked out well for Japanese Americans?

Muslim Americans today are taking your advice.

If guys are the solution why don't we just arm the Syrian and afgan people?