Attorney Mike Davis Issues Dire Warning to Judge Juan Merchan and Democrats Over Weaponized Lawfare Against President Trump: “On January 20th at Noon,

/----/
View attachment 1064236
It is an easy thing to call names; any fool is equal to that ... and the weapon of vituperation is generally used by those who lack brains for argument or are upon the wrong side.

Martha Finley
Martha Finley (pen name: Martha Farquharson; April 26, 1828 – January 30, 1909) was an American teacher and author of numerous works for children, the best known being the 28-volume Elsie Dinsmore series which was published over a span of 38 years.

1736617227543.png




As she said

the weapon of vituperation is generally used by those who lack brains

Just because you have less brains than Trump does not mean Trump is intelligent.

Thank you for an edifying debate today :auiqs.jpg:
 
Last edited:
Its symbolic of the desire to kill.

It was a crime also, but being a trumpanzee I never expected you to be aware of that, you lot never are.

As you can see I did not make anything up, I can always backup each and every claim I make in this forum.

A desire to kill? You cant kill people with props.

Nowhere in that article does it say that it was a crime. Quit making up fake crimes you incompetent retard. :cuckoo:
 
A desire to kill? You cant kill people with props.
Well I wouldn't say that, but nobody said the gallows were intended to kill anyone, if you learn to read and then re-read my post you'll see I said "It is symbolic of the desire to kill", I trust that clears up your confusion.
Nowhere in that article does it say that it was a crime. Quit making up fake crimes you incompetent retard.

The structure was illegal, those participating in it's construction broke the law.

1736622764138.png


Since like Trump, you don't know what "broke the law" means, you'll struggle to understand any of this.

As always Sherlock Holmes is here to help, so don't hesitate to reach out if anything else about this confuses you.
 
Well I wouldn't say that, but nobody said the gallows were intended to kill anyone, if you learn to read and then re-read my post you'll see I said "It is symbolic of the desire to kill", I trust that clears up your confusion.


The structure was illegal, those participating in it's construction broke the law.

View attachment 1064299

Since like Trump, you don't know what "broke the law" means, you'll struggle to understand any of this.

As always Sherlock Holmes is here to help, so don't hesitate to reach out if anything else about this confuses you.
Dont lecture me over a fucking prop when democrats were burning cities down for a year.
 
Don't lecture me over a fucking prop when democrats were burning cities down for a year.
If someone flew a Nazi flag as a "prop" at a Pro Israel gathering, I suspect you'd change your tune. Symbols mean something and they are used to intimidate and that's what the gallows were and that's why racists carry swastikas and so on.

So stop with the feigned outrage, you're fooling no one.
 
If someone flew a Nazi flag as a "prop" at a Pro Israel gathering, I suspect you'd change your tune. Symbols mean something and they are used to intimidate and that's what the gallows were and that's why racists carry swastikas and so on.

So stop with the feigned outrage, you're fooling no one.
The only people carrying swastikas are the anti jew wing of the democrat party. :cuckoo:
 
This is theater for gullible rubes. WWE Extra chromosome porn for fat white guys in camo hats.
 
I am not big on paybacks and retribution for political attacks, you win or lose come election time and del with the results whether you like 'em or not. BUT - the use of our justice system for political purposes against your opponent is something that should not be swept under the rug. There should be consequences that are serious enough to deter future misuse of power; Merchan could have dismissed the case citing the Supreme Court's recent ruling but didn't and IMHO he should pay the consequences for that decision.
 
Back
Top Bottom