Attorney Jarrett: NY Trump case full of error and prejudice, should be dismissed now

[forkintheroad7]

GREGG JARRETT: New York case against Trump should be dismissed after Merchan's delayed ruling

The New York case against Donald Trump was always convoluted and legally unsound, principally because it is not a crime to conceal a perfectly legal non-disclosure agreement.

www.foxnews.com

This is a very informative article that helps us understand just how AWFUL and political this "case" is. I already knew a lot of it, but sometimes, these things are complicated and it's good to re-read things to get a clear picture.

He says the judge over-ruled Trump constantly and that we still don't know what the underlying election "crime" was... etc.. It will be overturned on appeal anyway, so why not toss it?

 

[berg80]

This is a very informative article

Faux News

 

[Rogue AI]

Faux News

You won't be laughing when Trump is exonerated AGAIN.

 

[forkintheroad7]

You won't be laughing when Trump is exonerated AGAIN.

poster won't claim his ridicule, but we have the ability to dredge up all kinds of past posts, don't we?

We can say then "So much for your false prophecies" (or something like that)

 

[forkintheroad7]

By the way "Faux News"

is Number One in cable news ratings.

They could not get there by being "faux"

 

[para bellum]

It will be overturned on appeal anyway, so why not toss it?

I think Merchan will vacate the verdict because it will allow him to control the messaging. He can make up an excuse about how he can't jail a sitting President, blah blah blah.

If it waits for the Appeals Court, they will issue a long and detailed opinion that will list all the due process violations and legal errors that took place in Merchan's kangaroo court.

Merchan does not want to go through that embarrassment.

 

[Lisa558]

GREGG JARRETT: New York case against Trump should be dismissed after Merchan's delayed ruling

The New York case against Donald Trump was always convoluted and legally unsound, principally because it is not a crime to conceal a perfectly legal non-disclosure agreement.

www.foxnews.com

This is a very informative article that helps us understand just how AWFUL and political this "case" is. I already knew a lot of it, but sometimes, these things are complicated and it's good to re-read things to get a clear picture.

He says the judge over-ruled Trump constantly and that we still don't know what the underlying election "crime" was... etc.. It will be overturned on appeal anyway, so why not toss it?

Is dismissing the case sufficient? The prosecutor and judge both were on a personal mission to brand Trump “a convicted felon” in order to destroy his chances for the presidency - and knowing full well their case was full or holes and errors that would be overturned.

 

[forkintheroad7]

I think Merchan will vacate the verdict because it will allow him to control the messaging. He can make up an excuse about how he can't jail a sitting President, blah blah blah.

If it waits for the Appeals Court, they will issue a long and detailed opinion that will list all the due process violations and legal errors that took place in Merchan's kangaroo court.

Merchan does not want to go through that embarrassment.

I don't know. You seem to under estimate the dims' propensity for having NO shame at all. I believe he'ss been reversed several times before or maybe I get him mixed up with Jack Smith. You and I think it woiuld be stupid for him not to dismiss the case, but you and I are not dims. They're thinking - if you can call it that-- is not like normal folks'

 

[forkintheroad7]

Is dismissing the case sufficient? The prosecutor and judge both were on a personal mission to brand Trump “a convicted felon” in order to destroy his chances for the presidency - and knowing full well their case was full or holes and errors that would be overturned.

yeh, it's a great irony: a case allegedly against election interference, brought by folks attempting to interfere with an election.

I totally agree they should suffer the full consequences of what they did, but as we all know, dim elites get away with EVERYTHING

 

[Marener]

GREGG JARRETT: New York case against Trump should be dismissed after Merchan's delayed ruling

The New York case against Donald Trump was always convoluted and legally unsound, principally because it is not a crime to conceal a perfectly legal non-disclosure agreement.

www.foxnews.com

This is a very informative article that helps us understand just how AWFUL and political this "case" is. I already knew a lot of it, but sometimes, these things are complicated and it's good to re-read things to get a clear picture.

He says the judge over-ruled Trump constantly and that we still don't know what the underlying election "crime" was... etc.. It will be overturned on appeal anyway, so why not toss it?

Gregg Jarrett always praises and sides with Trump’s lawyers even when they file incredibly stupid motions and lawsuits. He’s a hack.

 

[theHawk]

GREGG JARRETT: New York case against Trump should be dismissed after Merchan's delayed ruling

The New York case against Donald Trump was always convoluted and legally unsound, principally because it is not a crime to conceal a perfectly legal non-disclosure agreement.

www.foxnews.com

This is a very informative article that helps us understand just how AWFUL and political this "case" is. I already knew a lot of it, but sometimes, these things are complicated and it's good to re-read things to get a clear picture.

He says the judge over-ruled Trump constantly and that we still don't know what the underlying election "crime" was... etc.. It will be overturned on appeal anyway, so why not toss it?

They have to hold it over his head as long as possible. So they can all go around calling him a “convicted felon” until he isn’t.

 

[Rogue AI]

poster won't claim his ridicule, but we have the ability to dredge up all kinds of past posts, don't we?

We can say then "So much for your false prophecies" (or something like that)

They just ignore it. They scream doom and gloom, yet predicted a Harris victory. Their proclamations are worthless.


The only smart path on the Trump case is dismissal. It will not survive the appeals process. If it goes that route it will cost NY millions.

 

[forkintheroad7]

They just ignore it. The scream doom and gloom, yet predicted a Harris victory. Their proclamations are worthless.


The only smart path on the Trump case is dismissal. It will not survive the appeals process. If it goes that route it will cost NY millions.

well, NY can then beg the fed govt to fork over more cash and probably get it. Meanwhile, Americans are homeless, some are Veterans.

The rich get richer and the poor can go to Hell, I guess

 

[forkintheroad7]

They have to hold it over his head as long as possible. So they can all go around calling him a “convicted felon” until he isn’t.

yeh, true, wonder why I didn't think of that, although I did know their original intent was to smear him in the 2024 election season. That wasn't hard to figure out.

 

[lafayette]

You won't be laughing when Trump is exonerated AGAIN.

He has never been exonerated.

He will be sentenced on the felonies in NY this month.

 

[para bellum]

I don't know. You seem to under estimate the dims' propensity for having NO shame at all. I believe he'ss been reversed several times before or maybe I get him mixed up with Jack Smith. You and I think it woiuld be stupid for him not to dismiss the case, but you and I are not dims. They're thinking - if you can call it that-- is not like normal folks'

You are right about the way they think, but he couldn't sentence Trump to jail because what do you do with the Secret Service detail?

If he sentences him to jail and/or probation and suspends the sentence, the appeal goes forward and the conviction gets tossed.

The purpose of the case was to smear Trump and interfere with his campaign, and they failed to have any impact. So the smart move is to vacate the verdict and control the message, but as you say- dims rarely do the smart thing, especially when Trump is involved...

 

[Rogue AI]

He has never been exonerated.

He will be sentenced on the felonies in NY this month.

We'll see how it turns out. Expect disappointment.

 

[JGalt]

Faux News

Are you gonna cry when every one of Trump bogus cases are thrown out of court?

I sure hope so.

 

[Dante]

GREGG JARRETT: New York case against Trump should be dismissed after Merchan's delayed ruling

The New York case against Donald Trump was always convoluted and legally unsound, principally because it is not a crime to conceal a perfectly legal non-disclosure agreement.

www.foxnews.com

This is a very informative article that helps us understand just how AWFUL and political this "case" is. I already knew a lot of it, but sometimes, these things are complicated and it's good to re-read things to get a clear picture.

He says the judge over-ruled Trump constantly and that we still don't know what the underlying election "crime" was... etc.. It will be overturned on appeal anyway, so why not toss it?

About
Gregory Walter Jarrett is an American conservative news commentator, author and attorney. He joined Fox News in November 2002, after working at local NBC and ABC TV stations for over ten years, as well as national networks Court TV and MSNBC. ???


"He says..."

Ho hum...

 

[forkintheroad7]

You are right about the way they think, but he couldn't sentence Trump to jail because what do you do with the Secret Service detail?

If he sentences him to jail and/or probation and suspends the sentence, the appeal goes forward and the conviction gets tossed.

The purpose of the case was to smear Trump and interfere with his campaign, and they failed to have any impact. So the smart move is to vacate the verdict and control the message, but as you say- dims rarely do the smart thing, especially when Trump is involved...

this is what is confusing sometimes about these cases, that really only attorneys fully understand. Is the case being "frozen" so that it can't advance to the appeals court? I hear that he has to be sentence before any appeal can be made. I don't know.. I am not 100% getting the different options here

a president cannot have charges brought against him but the charges were brought before he was president, but he was president at the time of the alleged crimes... Wow, it's too late in the day for me to try to figure things out..
Those lawyers seem to earn every penny they make, even if they are ambulance chasers...