Attack in Nice, France

[Dogmaphobe]

Stupid. Blame Obama for what Bush did.

Bush wrote the Q'ran and invented the notion of Jihad?!

Well, then, damn that man to the depths of hell, then!!

 

[Coyote]

The conservatives on this board cannot use reason, their entire worldview is based on hysterical emotion. A bubble that fact cannot penetrate.

The moment after terrorists blew up a marine barracks in Beirut in 1982 Ronald Reagan tucked tail and ran, and pulled the marines out. The current president authorizes countless airstrikes by the airforce and drone strikes against thousands of targets and is very successful in these efforts, but these cons view these facts opposite of what the reality is, they revere Reagan and think Obama isn't doing anything.

It is a bubble of ignorance that cannot be penetrated. It's one thing to point out your political enemy's faults, but to outrights ignore reality betrays a deep-seated hatred psychosis.

You derps are not worth the time as your reasoning ability has atrophied beyond repair. Enjoy your vomit.

Let me ask you this - how come there hasn't been a single liberal on this board that has condemned this atc?

Condemnation comes from the heart, not a posting on a messageboard and certainly not a thread full of baiting.

You want condemnation? You can have it. I condemn terrorists - anyone who chooses to deliberately kill innocent people out some misbegotten ideology or perversion of religion or pissed off attitude. I think most liberals would say the same thing but things are so partisan no one listens. You'd think a tragedy would unite people.

 

[NoNukes]

Bush attacking Iraq caused this. He created so many terrorists. We were warned at the time, and now is had come to happen. You are the ignorant boob. The west attacked Muslims, they are at tracking back with a vengeance.

The civil war in Syria is nothing to do with Bush. It started as a revolt against the government, Arab Spring and all that. And look how it turned out. I watched a live interview with Assad last night.

Whatever Bush did or didn't do, one could argue that there was a moral obligation for the allies to remin in Iraq, to stabilise the region. Which to a large extent was happening, till Obama withdrew the troops, and the whole thing flared up again.

Obama was not going to let more American soldiers die because of Bush's mistake. What is going on in Nice has little to do with what happened in Syria. This was a crazy Myslim guy doing suicude by police.

Obama is not going to go after the people murdering Americans.

Stupid

Yes, you are.
Hillary insisting al Queda was in Iraq was a great moment.
As well as Bill saying Iraq had WMDs when Bush took office.

Bush was warned and ignored it. Instead, he poked the hornets nest.

 

[westwall]

The civil war in Syria is nothing to do with Bush. It started as a revolt against the government, Arab Spring and all that. And look how it turned out. I watched a live interview with Assad last night.

Whatever Bush did or didn't do, one could argue that there was a moral obligation for the allies to remin in Iraq, to stabilise the region. Which to a large extent was happening, till Obama withdrew the troops, and the whole thing flared up again.

Obama was not going to let more American soldiers die because of Bush's mistake. What is going on in Nice has little to do with what happened in Syria. This was a crazy Myslim guy doing suicude by police.

Obama is not going to go after the people murdering Americans.

Stupid

Yes, you are.
Hillary insisting al Queda was in Iraq was a great moment.
As well as Bill saying Iraq had WMDs when Bush took office.

Bush was warned and ignored it. Instead, he poked the hornets nest.

A hornets nest that would not exist save for BRITISH meddling. The attack on Nice was done because it is an easy target. Pretty much all of France is an easy target, but Nice was the best at that moment due to the celebrations. That's what these scumbags are looking for, easy targets where they can get the most bang for their buck.

 

[Coyote]

This is the legacy of the Bush administration. We were warned that this could happen when Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld poked the hornets nest.

Oh blow it out your ass you fucking halfwit. You lecture everyone else about how they need to do some reading so here is me telling you that YOU need to do some reading. This, all of this stems from the meddling of the British government under Disraeli who wanted to play his little games against the Russian bear and the easiest way to do that was from the southern regions. To do that he had to stir up the hornets nest. Then, they took control of Egypt for all intents and purposes to safeguard the Suez canal, and then after WWI they divided up the Ottoman Empire and drew borders on maps without paying the slightest bit of attention to which tribes were being mingled with which tribes, nor which sect of Islam was going where.

Almost the entirety of the situation that is going on now can be laid at the feet of the incompetent British bureaucrats you ignorant boob.

Bush didn't help with his ignorant invasion of Iraq, but these conflicts have DEEP ROOTS that get repeatedly ignored. They did it with the ME, Africa, Asia....with an ignorant disregard to the anything beyond their own sphere. Look at the partition of India....

 

[Brynmr]

 

[westwall]

This is the legacy of the Bush administration. We were warned that this could happen when Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld poked the hornets nest.

Oh blow it out your ass you fucking halfwit. You lecture everyone else about how they need to do some reading so here is me telling you that YOU need to do some reading. This, all of this stems from the meddling of the British government under Disraeli who wanted to play his little games against the Russian bear and the easiest way to do that was from the southern regions. To do that he had to stir up the hornets nest. Then, they took control of Egypt for all intents and purposes to safeguard the Suez canal, and then after WWI they divided up the Ottoman Empire and drew borders on maps without paying the slightest bit of attention to which tribes were being mingled with which tribes, nor which sect of Islam was going where.

Almost the entirety of the situation that is going on now can be laid at the feet of the incompetent British bureaucrats you ignorant boob.

Bush didn't help with his ignorant invasion of Iraq, but these conflicts have DEEP ROOTS that get repeatedly ignored. They did it with the ME, Africa, Asia....with an ignorant disregard to the anything beyond their own sphere. Look at the partition of India....

That is absolutely true but if it wasn't Bush they would have begun their attacks because of some other reason. The pressure on the leadership was rising so they had to get that pressure relieved, and the easiest way to do that is to attack the western powers.

 

[WillowTree]

The conservatives on this board cannot use reason, their entire worldview is based on hysterical emotion. A bubble that fact cannot penetrate.

The moment after terrorists blew up a marine barracks in Beirut in 1982 Ronald Reagan tucked tail and ran, and pulled the marines out. The current president authorizes countless airstrikes by the airforce and drone strikes against thousands of targets and is very successful in these efforts, but these cons view these facts opposite of what the reality is, they revere Reagan and think Obama isn't doing anything.

It is a bubble of ignorance that cannot be penetrated. It's one thing to point out your political enemy's faults, but to outrights ignore reality betrays a deep-seated hatred psychosis.

You derps are not worth the time as your reasoning ability has atrophied beyond repair. Enjoy your vomit.

Let me ask you this - how come there hasn't been a single liberal on this board that has condemned this atc?

Condemnation comes from the heart, not a posting on a messageboard and certainly not a thread full of baiting.

You want condemnation? You can have it. I condemn terrorists - anyone who chooses to deliberately kill innocent people out some misbegotten ideology or perversion of religion or pissed off attitude. I think most liberals would say the same thing but things are so partisan no one listens. You'd think a tragedy would unite people.

Only for a short time, then the libtards are back at it calling everyone racists.

 

[WillowTree]

View attachment 81633

Save the goat. His life has been hell too.

 

[Weatherman2020]

The civil war in Syria is nothing to do with Bush. It started as a revolt against the government, Arab Spring and all that. And look how it turned out. I watched a live interview with Assad last night.

Whatever Bush did or didn't do, one could argue that there was a moral obligation for the allies to remin in Iraq, to stabilise the region. Which to a large extent was happening, till Obama withdrew the troops, and the whole thing flared up again.

Obama was not going to let more American soldiers die because of Bush's mistake. What is going on in Nice has little to do with what happened in Syria. This was a crazy Myslim guy doing suicude by police.

Obama is not going to go after the people murdering Americans.

Stupid

Yes, you are.
Hillary insisting al Queda was in Iraq was a great moment.
As well as Bill saying Iraq had WMDs when Bush took office.

Bush was warned and ignored it. Instead, he poked the hornets nest.

Moron thinks the 93 WTC bombing was because W invaded Iraq.

 

[dannyboys]

Bastille Day truck attack for dummies: Tour de France, Tom Brady and Deflategate
The Tour de France was the first major global sports events to be in fact terminated by the illuminati: all major champions were systematically falsely accused of doping and stripped.
But the key subliminal name in the cast of the "Bastille Day truck attack " is not Lance Armstrong.
It's Tom Brady and he's yet to be stipped, same as Obama and Bolt.

Jul 2016 - Two stages in the Tour de France before and after the Euro 2016 final, to:
- celebrate the destruction of the Tour de France
- pass two messages about the end of the show, each time literally fulfilling "order out of chaos" by including each time the CHAOS word in the headlines.

1. Jul 8, 2016 - "Chaos at Tour de France as flamme rouge deflates".
Goal: remind human cattle about the end of show and in particular the most extreme inversion of illuminnati scripts ever.
The end of show series "hero to zero" and "stripped of" are part of both setting the stage and celebrating that inversion.

2. July 14, 2016 - "On Bastille Day, storming fans spark chaos at Tour de France"
Goal: announce another satanic celebration for Bastille day, this time hours later, at Nice.
In other words: another fake blood episode setting the stage for the manhunt for muslims, arabs, non-whites and dissidents, which includes extending the "state of emergency" (it won't be lifted until the genocide is completed) .

Notes
Chaos at Tour de France in two stages
Jul 8, 2016 - Chaos at Tour de France as flamme rouge deflates
July 14, 2016 - Froome keeps the yellow jersey after dramatic tour stage

BASICS
"From hero to zero", "stripped of" and "first woman leading"
Transcript
All series at the end of the show mocking this:
Obama's staged arrest, stripped of titles and sentenced to death by SCOTUS, with Hillary Clinton proclaimed the real 44th president, successor of GW Bush.
Not only first woman president but also ensuring BushClinton as president since 1992.
All this before Hitlery would finally win a "legit election" from begin to end, with a result even more impossible than the 43-8 of Superbowl 48: her real polls are 2%.
Unlike some of the participants in the first and second series, probably none of the women in the third series was forced to appear in the cast.
As always each episode also advances specific agendas, from setting the stage for manhunt for non-whites to marketing the hoax "champions of natural sports dope".
Examples - From Politics to Sports, not to mention the named shows: business and reality.
From hero to zero
Sports: Peyton Manning Superbowl 2014, Tom Brady following the Superbowl 2015, Cam Newton Superbowl 2016.
Lance Armstrong, greatest cyclist ever. Coming: Usain Bolt, fastest man ever and forever; Lionel Messi, greatest football player ever.
Stripped of
Sports: Lance Armstrong, Tour de France seven times.
Coming: Usain Bolt, world records, titles.
Not only Tom Brady and the Patriots but also Peyton Manning and the Broncos from their Superbowl titles and beyond: the NFL books stripped from the Superbowl 2016.
Peyton Manning 2014 as loser part of "hero to zero" while 2016, as winner, part of the coming "stripped of".
On the other hand Tom Brady, both times related to 2015: first "hero to zero" alias "deflategate scandal" before the coming "stripped of".
Superbowl 2016, stripped from the books. The Seattle Seahawks will be declared the very last champions, winners not only in 2014 but also in 2015. In other words: the Superbowl 2016 will be declared a sCam, null and void,.
Simulated reality terminated NOW: From hero to zero, stripped of, first woman leading: END OF SHOW series

From Nice, France to Vice, USA
Manhunt from muslims to blacks: Undeniable evidence:
Miss Alabama and Trumpence on stage on a day Of Last Trumpets in the illuminati anti-bible: all predicted 2009
End Times Prophet: Manhunt for blacks: Miss Alabama and Trumpence on stage on a day Of Last Trumpets in tge abti.bible: all predicted 2009

I'm sorry. I thought I had already put you on PI. Apparently not.
This time for sure. You're mentally ill.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Condemnation comes from the heart, not a posting on a messageboard and certainly not a thread full of baiting.

You want condemnation? You can have it. I condemn terrorists - anyone who chooses to deliberately kill innocent people out some misbegotten ideology or perversion of religion or pissed off attitude. I think most liberals would say the same thing but things are so partisan no one listens. You'd think a tragedy would unite people.

Still, you share their goals and support their aims, if not their methods.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[
Moron thinks the 93 WTC bombing was because W invaded Iraq.

Not only that, the extinction of the dinosaurs as well.

 

[depotoo]

I grew up Presbyterian and have never known of this Jewish hatred you portray by them.

Sure they do. They are just too dumb to learn.

How many surviving gays in Orlando are going to vote for HIllary, to bring more Muslims to America?

Good point.

My reference to them never suffering consequences was aimed at progressive politicians.

I would say any homosexual voting for Clinton, has to have their head examined. But, then look at the Jewish vote. They continue to vote D...so it is hard to understand, other than it is just insanity.

Jews due to their history do not trust Christians...even Evangelicals who are the strongest supporters of Israel.

Yes and it is most nonsensical.

It is a good example of how propaganda dupes people. Jews have been told that Nazis were Christians, when clearly they were not. The Nazis were leftists and yet, Jews side with the left.

Well lots of Nazis were catholic...even hitler.... Jews did mistakenly believe Catholics were Christian...one can hardly blame them...living in europe for hundreds of years at the mercy of these so called Christians aka Roman Catholics.

Even today in America a lot of so called Christians aka Presbyterians and other left wing protestants are very full of Jew Hatred.

Jews associate liberals with socialists and communists...and they much prefer a Russian Communist over a Christian Fascist. They view Russia for the most part very favorably crediting them with coming in and destroying nazism and wrecking vengance on those who murdered jews in a mechanical method of mass murder. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

 

[Rocko]

The conservatives on this board cannot use reason, their entire worldview is based on hysterical emotion. A bubble that fact cannot penetrate.

The moment after terrorists blew up a marine barracks in Beirut in 1982 Ronald Reagan tucked tail and ran, and pulled the marines out. The current president authorizes countless airstrikes by the airforce and drone strikes against thousands of targets and is very successful in these efforts, but these cons view these facts opposite of what the reality is, they revere Reagan and think Obama isn't doing anything.

It is a bubble of ignorance that cannot be penetrated. It's one thing to point out your political enemy's faults, but to outrights ignore reality betrays a deep-seated hatred psychosis.

You derps are not worth the time as your reasoning ability has atrophied beyond repair. Enjoy your vomit.

Let me ask you this - how come there hasn't been a single liberal on this board that has condemned this atc?

Condemnation comes from the heart, not a posting on a messageboard and certainly not a thread full of baiting.

You want condemnation? You can have it. I condemn terrorists - anyone who chooses to deliberately kill innocent people out some misbegotten ideology or perversion of religion or pissed off attitude. I think most liberals would say the same thing but things are so partisan no one listens. You'd think a tragedy would unite people.

It was only a matter of time before you came here to defend terrorists...

 

[Coyote]

The conservatives on this board cannot use reason, their entire worldview is based on hysterical emotion. A bubble that fact cannot penetrate.

The moment after terrorists blew up a marine barracks in Beirut in 1982 Ronald Reagan tucked tail and ran, and pulled the marines out. The current president authorizes countless airstrikes by the airforce and drone strikes against thousands of targets and is very successful in these efforts, but these cons view these facts opposite of what the reality is, they revere Reagan and think Obama isn't doing anything.

It is a bubble of ignorance that cannot be penetrated. It's one thing to point out your political enemy's faults, but to outrights ignore reality betrays a deep-seated hatred psychosis.

You derps are not worth the time as your reasoning ability has atrophied beyond repair. Enjoy your vomit.

Let me ask you this - how come there hasn't been a single liberal on this board that has condemned this atc?

Condemnation comes from the heart, not a posting on a messageboard and certainly not a thread full of baiting.

You want condemnation? You can have it. I condemn terrorists - anyone who chooses to deliberately kill innocent people out some misbegotten ideology or perversion of religion or pissed off attitude. I think most liberals would say the same thing but things are so partisan no one listens. You'd think a tragedy would unite people.

It was only a matter of time before you came here to defend terrorists...

Where have I defended terrorists? Link?

Oh wait...I haven't

 

[Coyote]

Condemnation comes from the heart, not a posting on a messageboard and certainly not a thread full of baiting.

You want condemnation? You can have it. I condemn terrorists - anyone who chooses to deliberately kill innocent people out some misbegotten ideology or perversion of religion or pissed off attitude. I think most liberals would say the same thing but things are so partisan no one listens. You'd think a tragedy would unite people.

Still, you share their goals and support their aims, if not their methods.

Link?

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

The conservatives on this board cannot use reason, their entire worldview is based on hysterical emotion. A bubble that fact cannot penetrate.

The moment after terrorists blew up a marine barracks in Beirut in 1982 Ronald Reagan tucked tail and ran, and pulled the marines out. The current president authorizes countless airstrikes by the airforce and drone strikes against thousands of targets and is very successful in these efforts, but these cons view these facts opposite of what the reality is, they revere Reagan and think Obama isn't doing anything.

It is a bubble of ignorance that cannot be penetrated. It's one thing to point out your political enemy's faults, but to outrights ignore reality betrays a deep-seated hatred psychosis.

You derps are not worth the time as your reasoning ability has atrophied beyond repair. Enjoy your vomit.

Let me ask you this - how come there hasn't been a single liberal on this board that has condemned this atc?

Condemnation comes from the heart, not a posting on a messageboard and certainly not a thread full of baiting.

You want condemnation? You can have it. I condemn terrorists - anyone who chooses to deliberately kill innocent people out some misbegotten ideology or perversion of religion or pissed off attitude. I think most liberals would say the same thing but things are so partisan no one listens. You'd think a tragedy would unite people.

It was only a matter of time before you came here to defend terrorists...

I can see questioning his sincerity; but how was he defending terrorists?

 

[Rocko]

The conservatives on this board cannot use reason, their entire worldview is based on hysterical emotion. A bubble that fact cannot penetrate.

The moment after terrorists blew up a marine barracks in Beirut in 1982 Ronald Reagan tucked tail and ran, and pulled the marines out. The current president authorizes countless airstrikes by the airforce and drone strikes against thousands of targets and is very successful in these efforts, but these cons view these facts opposite of what the reality is, they revere Reagan and think Obama isn't doing anything.

It is a bubble of ignorance that cannot be penetrated. It's one thing to point out your political enemy's faults, but to outrights ignore reality betrays a deep-seated hatred psychosis.

You derps are not worth the time as your reasoning ability has atrophied beyond repair. Enjoy your vomit.

Let me ask you this - how come there hasn't been a single liberal on this board that has condemned this atc?

Condemnation comes from the heart, not a posting on a messageboard and certainly not a thread full of baiting.

You want condemnation? You can have it. I condemn terrorists - anyone who chooses to deliberately kill innocent people out some misbegotten ideology or perversion of religion or pissed off attitude. I think most liberals would say the same thing but things are so partisan no one listens. You'd think a tragedy would unite people.

It was only a matter of time before you came here to defend terrorists...

I can see questioning his sincerity; but how was he defending terrorists?

Not in that particular post, but it is his MO.

 

[Coyote]

The conservatives on this board cannot use reason, their entire worldview is based on hysterical emotion. A bubble that fact cannot penetrate.

The moment after terrorists blew up a marine barracks in Beirut in 1982 Ronald Reagan tucked tail and ran, and pulled the marines out. The current president authorizes countless airstrikes by the airforce and drone strikes against thousands of targets and is very successful in these efforts, but these cons view these facts opposite of what the reality is, they revere Reagan and think Obama isn't doing anything.

It is a bubble of ignorance that cannot be penetrated. It's one thing to point out your political enemy's faults, but to outrights ignore reality betrays a deep-seated hatred psychosis.

You derps are not worth the time as your reasoning ability has atrophied beyond repair. Enjoy your vomit.

Let me ask you this - how come there hasn't been a single liberal on this board that has condemned this atc?

Condemnation comes from the heart, not a posting on a messageboard and certainly not a thread full of baiting.

You want condemnation? You can have it. I condemn terrorists - anyone who chooses to deliberately kill innocent people out some misbegotten ideology or perversion of religion or pissed off attitude. I think most liberals would say the same thing but things are so partisan no one listens. You'd think a tragedy would unite people.

It was only a matter of time before you came here to defend terrorists...

I can see questioning his sincerity; but how was he defending terrorists?

Not in that particular post, but it is his MO.

Then you should be able to link to somewhere I defended terrorists or terrorism. Strangely enough, when ever I ask.....silence. Surely you can find something?