william the wie
Gold Member
- Nov 18, 2009
- 16,667
- 2,408
- 280
No, you are being intentionally obtuse (the term 'intentionally' giving you the benefit of the doubt). As I stated originally, economists agree that it takes a long time, usually years, for administration policies to affect the economy. As I said, in the beginning years, Obama was overcoming Bush's policies, which is why the economy didn't show much improvement. Today, economists say that it is too early to tell if Trump's policies have anything to do with improvements in the economy. The reality is that the economy was already improving had and been improving for a long time before Trump took office. It has merely continued on that upswing. Not to do with Trump or his policies as he has only been in office one year.And this proves my point.I think it is the reason why it was so slow in the beginning, because Obama had to overcome Bush policies.So the recovery under Obama was due to Bush policies...Economists say that the administration of a president and its policies do not have immediate effect on the economy, that it takes time, sometimes years, which is why people say that what is occuring in the economy now is down to Obama's policies. It is too soon to see the effects of Trump's policies on the economy.It is all a matter of perspective. The democrats will say that all the positive outcomes this year are due squarely to Obama's policies (while blaming all failures on Trump).
Claiming that they are un-American is no better or different than the left blindly calling so many on the right sexist, homophobic or racists. Both only serve to suppress open discussion through denigrating the other side.
You are attributing positive outcomes with the previous admin to the president in office but the current admin with the previous one.
True, Trump had so many gimmes handed to him by the stupidities of the Obama administration like Trans-Canada he has so far been able to cookbook his presidency.