Although La Raza has changed its name to UnidosUS, its goals are clearly the same basis as those demanding freebies at the border. From:
Exclusive: The Truth About 'La Raza' | Human Events
1. Denounce the motto “For La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada,” as repugnant, racist, and totally incompatible with American society or citizenship.
2. Acknowledge the right of all Americans to live wherever they choose in the U.S. without segregation.
3. Commit to sponsorship of nationwide educational programs to combat racism and anti-Semitism in the Hispanic community.
4. Denounce and sever all ties with MEChA and any other organizations with which they have ever been associated which held to the racist doctrines held by MEChA.
5. Acknowledge the internationally recognized borders of the U.S., the right of the citizens of the U.S. to determine
immigration policy through the democratic process, and the right of the U.S. to undertake any and all necessary steps to effectively enforce immigration law and defend its border against unauthorized entry.
6. Repudiate all claims that current American territory rightfully belongs to Mexico.
The trouble is, UnidosUS is still racist. It helps only its own and their collaborators. They do not support equal opportunities for anybody else, and they entitle themselves to all assets earned by people they wouldn't give the time of day for any reason whatever, their hatred is so directed against this nation, based on the myth that they and not the American Indian tribes who lived and still live here ruled the southwestern plains into antiquity.
From here;
La Raza Has Changed Its Name But Don’t Be Fooled: It’s Still A SICK, RACIST Group "Juan Sanchez, a National Council of La Raza board member, is CEO of Southwest Key Programs.
KXAN of Austin reports that Southwest Key has received $995 million in federal funds since 2015 to house migrant children. Over a three-year period, Southwest Key had “more than 200 violations at its facilities,” including a resident failing to receive proper treatment for a sexually transmitted disease (STD)."
When did this nation grant to its social security payers a billion bucks for our grandchildren's educations? Last time I looked, we were responsible for paying for our own children's educations, and one retiree's share of forced annual contributions to schools alone is over four thousand dollars for public schools who live in my county. This comes from one-third that person's pension, completely and thoroughly expropriated by local officials who have to make sure every child in this border state county learns to read and write. Another third of that same person's pension is removed to pay local upkeep and gifts to keep greedy-for-welfare-benefits of nonworkers of able-bodied people between the ages of 18 - retirement. It pays not to own any property, just collect and scream "racial foul" if anybody objects.
When you elect entitlement-oriented politicians to public office, they use access to what should be private information as their personal piggy bank to lure nonworkers into scamming people's life savings. If you divide $300,000 by the 30 years a retiree hopes to live after retiring, that's only $10,000 a year,. and less if the stock market crashes. So they look at the lump sum and decide that with social security, they're entitled to plunder money from the thrifty person who paid taxes on that nest egg money for every day of their adult life. And they tap the education people to support the atheist agenda to have zero mercy on anyone who was able to save money and earn interest on it (or not) by supporting investment in America through the stock market. Since the stock market can be a gamble, probably 20% of investors put money on stocks that bust, and they lose everything.
I guess I don't make any sense to someone who retires and completely depends on social security because of either bad luck or the bad decision to spend money on drugs, booze and cigarettes, and therefore had nothing to save at the end of the day for old age.
There's always someone at city hall snooping people's savings accounts so they can get their hands on and grab all the money from people who live in the area who did save money for their own use, and entitle the city, county or state to all they can grab. And if it's there they grab like the unfair cheaters that they become when they adopt the give-a-mint policy of usurping other taxpayer's money. It's a never-ending quest to get re-elected by expropriating their loyal opposition's supporters.