Asian American (and Immigrant) Success Completely Debunks Myth of 'Systemic Racism'

[sealybobo]

guess we have come a long since the Chinese Exclusion and Page Acts...View attachment 512287

Ummmm....YEAH - those were 1882 and 1875, respectively...OVER 100 YEARS AGO.

We've come a long way but still there is a pecking order in America. Whites at the top and asians know they are better than black Americans but they will never be equal to whites.

Remember that white rally Trump said good people on both sides? I bet you didn't see one asian on either side. They know to stay out of it.

Just look at all the attacks after Trump talked about the China Virus or Woohan Flu. What a dick. Couldn't just call it covid or corona?

 

[sealybobo]

Meanwhile Harvard is busying rigging their admissions program to admit less asians. Thanks for playing.

You mean Asian's from Asia? They pay out of state tuition. That's why colleges love foreign students.

 

[Crepitus]

‘INCONVENIENT MINORITY’

Asian American success in US debunks myth of 'systematic racism’​

'Asian Americans never needed politics to succeed in this country. They just want to be treated based on merit,'​

"Asian Americans are an "inconvenient minority" to the liberal media because as their community succeeds based on merit alone, they debunk the critical race theory narrative that opportunities of non-Whites are limited because of systematic racism in the United States.

"Asian-Americans prove that critical race theory is not true, cannot be true. Asian Americans never needed politics to succeed in this country. They just want to be treated based on merit."


"If America is still a systemically racist country for minorities, how come they have allowed Asian-Americans to overtake Whites in education level and socioeconomic status? Asians get higher test scores"

Asian Americans face plenty of problems but doesn't buy into CRT's theory that systemic racism limits opportunities for all non-White Americans.

"The whole idea of critical race theory is developed by saying, ‘Hey, our laws, our society, our structures are inherently stacked against people of color," Xu said. "Asian-Americans prove that, even in the face of whatever racial narratives that you're in, you still can succeed, that this country is the land of opportunity."


I love when Leftist Extremists', Liberal Progressive Socialist Democrats', and corrupt, America-hating Marxists' bogus ideology, agendas, and indoctrination attempts get shredded and completely debunked.

Despite all the evidence needed to debunk their crap being presented, Democrats and snowflakes still cling to their emotions and opinions, especially when it comes to calling others 'racist'.

Success of Asian Americans debunks critical race theory, ‘Inconvenient Minority’ author says

The author of a new book feels Asian Americans are an "inconvenient minority" to the liberal media because as their community succeeds based on merit alone, they debunk the critical race theory narrative.

www.foxnews.com

Ah, the "model minority" myth.

We've heard this one before.

 

[krichton]

Meanwhile Harvard is busying rigging their admissions program to admit less asians. Thanks for playing.

You mean Asian's from Asia? They pay out of state tuition. That's why colleges love foreign students.

No. I'm talking about american students who are asian. They have admitted that they are doing this.

 

[Unkotare]

Meanwhile Harvard is busying rigging their admissions program to admit less asians. Thanks for playing.

You mean Asian's from Asia? They pay out of state tuition. That's why colleges love foreign students.

No. I'm talking about american students who are asian. They have admitted that they are doing this.

Bobobrainless can't comprehend that notion.

 

[Quasar44]

easyt65
Black failure is their own illogical life style decisions
This will never change but many have risen up into the middle and upper class

 

[easyt65]

easyt65
Black failure is their own illogical life style decisions
This will never change but many have risen up into the middle and upper class

Charles Barkley said the same thing.

 

[Quasar44]

easyt65
I see them at work
Most are illiterate
Most have kids by 18
Most have zero conscious

 

[sealybobo]

Meanwhile Harvard is busying rigging their admissions program to admit less asians. Thanks for playing.

You mean Asian's from Asia? They pay out of state tuition. That's why colleges love foreign students.

No. I'm talking about american students who are asian. They have admitted that they are doing this.

Why? Because they are testing better or because they are minorities? If you need to get your diversity numbers up, I'd go with Asians too. They will do GREAT at Harvard.

 

[sealybobo]

Meanwhile Harvard is busying rigging their admissions program to admit less asians. Thanks for playing.

You mean Asian's from Asia? They pay out of state tuition. That's why colleges love foreign students.

No. I'm talking about american students who are asian. They have admitted that they are doing this.

Bobobrainless can't comprehend that notion.

There you go again talking about me not the subject. You have a hard on for me and Asian men.

 

[krichton]

Meanwhile Harvard is busying rigging their admissions program to admit less asians. Thanks for playing.

You mean Asian's from Asia? They pay out of state tuition. That's why colleges love foreign students.

No. I'm talking about american students who are asian. They have admitted that they are doing this.

Why? Because they are testing better or because they are minorities? If you need to get your diversity numbers up, I'd go with Asians too. They will do GREAT at Harvard.

Harvard has no problem with minorities, just asians. Clearly you haven't heard the story. Harvard has made it a requirement that Asians need to have higher SAT scores, than whites and other minorities in order to qualify for entry. This is because Harvard feels that all asians do not have the same "personal qualities traits" or personalities as whites do. This is why Harvard was sued. However the courts have decided that all asians in fact have bad personalities so will allow Harvard to continue their practice of discrimination.

Why The Asian American Students Lost Their Case Against Harvard (But Should Have Won)

A federal judge ruled in favor of Harvard in a discrimination suit brought by Asian American applicants. The Court acknowledged that Asian Americans face significant bias in getting admitted but that it is not Harvard's fault.

www.forbes.com

 

[IM2]

ALL RISE!
This mornings lesson:

Mari Matsuda: Critical Race Theory is not Anti-Asian

I understand yet another attack on Critical Race Theory (CRT) has surfaced, this time claiming CRT is anti-Asian. This kind of opportunism always trails along to disrupt progressive movements. It has been there from the start of CRT. Many built their careers attacking CRT, Trumpsters being the latest iteration on the Right. It is my practice to ignore critics who have not read the work and who are not interested in honest exchange. I will not read the latest entry in the annals of backlash, but I do want to say this for the record: Asian Americans are at the center of CRT analysis and have been from the start.

Neil Gotanda, Phil Nash, and I were at the founding CRT meeting in Wisconsin in the ‘80s. We came out of the Third World Liberation tradition. We were schooled by Nisei radicals, like Yuri Kochiyama, and in my case, my Mom, to know that alliance with Black and Brown folks was critical to fighting racism, militarism, imperialism, and colonialism. They taught us to see the through line from the Middle Passage to My Lai. Of course, we were ready to develop a theory of racism as the core of American legal liberalism.

Contrary to the experience of being “the Asian in the room” that had to bring our issues to the fore, we were part of an intellectual community in which Black participants understood that racism against Asian Americans was part of the legacy of U.S. white supremacy. It was Kimberlé Crenshaw who first brought up, at the Wisconsin meeting, the issue of particular forms of racialized misogyny deployed against Asian American women through media imagery. She was one of the first scholars, of any race, to push for an analysis of US immigration law in increasing Asian immigrant women’s vulnerability to intimate partner violence. Intersectionality theory came out of this crucible, with Asian women critical to the analysis. This was all back in the 80’s.

I participated in the first published symposium of Critical Race Theory scholarship, with an article (Looking to the Bottom, Harvard Civil Rights Civil Liberties Law Review) on reparations for Japanese Americans and Native Hawaiians. I co-authored the first CRT book, Words That Wound, centering analysis of hate crimes against Asian Americans. I used CRT analysis to write the first law review article on accent discrimination (Voices of America, Yale Law Review) based on case studies of Filipino and Native Hawaiian litigants. In We Won’t Go Back, written with Charles Lawrence, I used CRT to analyze Asian American responses to affirmative action. I have applied CRT to develop a course on Asian Americans and the law, first at UCLA and then at Georgetown. This work was foundational Critical Race Theory, developed by unpacking anti-Asian racism through a historical and structural analysis of US racism. All of it came out of struggle: real issues and real needs in Asian American communities. That is what Critical Race Theory is, and Asians have been at the center of it. If I start a citation list, it will go on for pages – many brilliant scholars using CRT to analyze anti-Asian racism. Suffice to say, Asian American thinkers were central in the development of CRT, and we were pushed and supported by our Black and Latinx colleagues.

Mari Matsuda: Critical Race Theory is not Anti-Asian

By Guest Contributor: Mari Matsuda Editor’s Note: This piece is a response to “Asian Americans Emerging as a Strong Voice Against Critical Race Theory”, an op-ed published earlier this week on News…

reappropriate.co

 

[IM2]

Harvard has no problem with minorities, just asians. Clearly you haven't heard the story. Harvard has made it a requirement that Asians need to have higher SAT scores, than whites and other minorities in order to qualify for entry. This is because Harvard feels that all asians do not have the same "personal qualities traits" or personalities as whites do. This is why Harvard was sued. However the courts have decided that all asians in fact have bad personalities so will allow Harvard to continue their practice of discrimination.

Why The Asian American Students Lost Their Case Against Harvard (But Should Have Won)

A federal judge ruled in favor of Harvard in a discrimination suit brought by Asian American applicants. The Court acknowledged that Asian Americans face significant bias in getting admitted but that it is not Harvard's fault.

www.forbes.com

This is a lie.

Move on.

 

[krichton]

This is a lie.

Move on.

What's a lie? State the lie, or move on.

 

[Snouter]

There is systemic anti-White racism. It is full blown now, but has been in the works for a long time.

 

[IM2]

What's a lie? State the lie, or move on.

The entire OP. Asians helped write Critical Race Theory.

 

[Decus]

The entire OP. Asians helped write Critical Race Theory.

The OP is not arguing CRT but saying that Asians face the same difficulties as Blacks but are succeeding whereas Blacks are not.

.

 

[IM2]

Harvard has no problem with minorities, just asians. Clearly you haven't heard the story. Harvard has made it a requirement that Asians need to have higher SAT scores, than whites and other minorities in order to qualify for entry. This is because Harvard feels that all asians do not have the same "personal qualities traits" or personalities as whites do. This is why Harvard was sued. However the courts have decided that all asians in fact have bad personalities so will allow Harvard to continue their practice of discrimination.

Why The Asian American Students Lost Their Case Against Harvard (But Should Have Won)

A federal judge ruled in favor of Harvard in a discrimination suit brought by Asian American applicants. The Court acknowledged that Asian Americans face significant bias in getting admitted but that it is not Harvard's fault.

www.forbes.com

Again this is untrue. First off everybody is subjected to this same criteria, so Asians do not really have to get a higher SAT score. They might have to participate in more extracurricular social activities, but if they met this threshold and a lower SAT score, they get in. There is nothing new about this. Colleges all over base admissions on more than SAT scores and over 900 have made them either optional or not requirred.

Finally Asians are less than 10 percent of the US population but 21 percent of the undergrad students at Harvard. The only population with more are white students. They are 12 percent of the graduates. and there is a international category which probably adds to the number.

Harvard University Diversity: Racial Demographics & Other Stats

Explore Harvard University diversity statistics including racial demographics, ethnicity, gender ratio, undergrad enrollment, average ages of students and other Harvard student population stats.

www.collegefactual.com

 

[IM2]

The OP is not arguing CRT but saying that Asians face the same difficulties as Blacks but are succeeding whereas Blacks are not.

.

And the Asians who helped write CRT are saying Asians and blacks struggle the same.

 

[Juicin]

The entire OP. Asians helped write Critical Race Theory.

asians and latinos vote against affirmative action....Even in California

While i don't doubt there were people of all creeds (i was honestly surprised at the lack of jews i suspect lies lol) behind this shit.

Don't seem like they think much of applying CRT to anything

The only ethnic group embracing this shit with any gusto is black America. And maybe the jews, until they get counted as their own group and get quotas too anyway, hahahahha