Ashkenazim and Germans

the territory of Germany itself was formerly Austrasia (Austria). Most modern "Germans" have nothing to do with Germans
 
images


first celts

04252e2af93cdd7a30d7d4e51d6cfcd8.png



germans-balts
 
The occupation of the Proto-Germans is also less clear. In particular, there is a reconstruction of the battle between the Fatyanovites and the Aryans of the Abashevo culture. The Fatyanovites organized a raid on the Aryan cows, and cut off the heads of several of shepherds. After that, the Aryan detachment arrived in time, which defeated them and returned the severed heads, they remained in the burials.
They hid in forest swampy places and made forays into the fields. Used stone axes


Soon after that, the Fatyanovites were completely destroyed, around 2000.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps part of the Rig Veda describes exactly this time and place, in verses where they talk about the killers of cows from the forest.
 
Approximately the same behavior is described by the strategist Mauritius, in relation to the "Slavs", but there it is about the forest dwellers, therefore it is probably about the Baltic-Germans.
 
In addition, it is apparently incorrect to assume that the Aryans came to the Danube valley, they have always been there, since this is part of their Eurasian steppe. Hallstadt culture was just a stage in their development
 
In fact, the native speakers of the Slavs are only the Huns ...

The Hungarians speak a Finno-Ugrian language - and not a German language nor a Slawic language. They are about 6000 years old and part of the "Uralian" language which is much older.

overview of the Uralic languages:

Uralic-Yukaghir.png

"Yukaghir" is not a clear candidate in this context.

And the language of the Avars is unknown!!! And the Bulgars speak a Slawic language. This has also nothing to do with the Hungarians.
 
Last edited:
The Hungarians speak a Finno-Ugrian language - and not a German language nor a Slawic language. They are about 6000 years old and part of the "Uralian" language which is much older.

overview of the Uralic languages:

Uralic-Yukaghir.png

"Yukaghir" is not a clear candidate in this context.
I mean Bulgaryans, Khazaryans and Avaryans

As for the "Finno-Ugrian hypothesis", this is another circus. The Ugrians have nothing to do with the Sami, and the real Finns are not Sami either, Finns are Veneti(feni, veni, venetsians).

By the way, the Hungarian writing is interesting in that it is the same writing that was found in Scandinavia among the Old Scandinavians, which they are trying to ascribe to the fabulous Germans "Vikings". The Bulgaryans also had these runes.
 
the territory of Germany itself was formerly Austrasia (Austria).

You <alwqas confuse "Austria" with "Austrien". Austria is an Eastern part of Bavaria - the so called "Ostmark" of Germany - which was seperated from Bavaria because the master dukedom (feudal dukedom) Bavaria became too mighty for the other German tribes. So Bavfra8us ws söpiteted into two parts.

Most modern "Germans" have nothing to do with Germans

Idiot.
 
The occupation of the Proto-Germans is also less clear. In particular, there is a reconstruction of the battle between the Fatyanovites and the Aryans of the Abashevo culture. The Fatyanovites organized a raid on the Aryan cows, and cut off the heads of several of shepherds. After that, the Aryan detachment arrived in time, which defeated them and returned the severed heads, they remained in the burials.
They hid in forest swampy places and made forays into the fields. Used stone axes


Soon after that, the Fatyanovites were completely destroyed, around 2000.

History of Aldebaran IV is always interesting for the star gate team 13½.
 
You <alwqas confuse "Austria" with "Austrien". Austria is an Eastern part of Bavaria - the so called "Ostmark" of Germany - which was seperated from Bavaria because the master dukedom (feudal dukedom) Bavaria became too mighty for the other German tribes. So Bavfra8us ws söpiteted into two parts.
It doesn't matter, it all relates to Austrasia. The Huns lived in Bavaria, there is an oriental type of appearance.

bp.jpeg
 
Approximately the same behavior is described by the strategist Mauritius, in relation to the "Slavs", but there it is about the forest dwellers, therefore it is probably about the Baltic-Germans.

I would suggest to you to change the word "slav" into the word "slaw" because indeed the word "slave" comes from this word. Specially the vikings sold many slavs = slaves in Byzantium = in the Orient. And the "Baltic-Germans" are just simple the Prussians. Or do you know any other "Baltic Germans"? The Prussians don't exist any longer. Same with the Silesians, the Bohemians and others.
 
I would suggest to you to change the word "slav" into the word "slaw" because indeed the word "slave" comes from this word.
Initially, this obviously came from the name of the Baltic or Finnish word sloven. This is not important, because there are still no Slavs as a people, this is a linguistic community. This name was most likely invented by the Prussians in the 18th century, this language is Old Bulgarian, and the Huns spoke it. Some of the Prussians were also Slavicized. But this is not their native language.
 
Or do you know any other "Baltic Germans"
Of course. Golindy (ancestors of Muscovites and Dutchmen), Melanchlens, Androphages, Krivichi, Litvin, Samogitians, Nadruvs, Skalvians, Mozovians, Kuevlians, Curonians and about a hundred more.

By the way, it turns out that the Prussians were called Estii differently, and modern Estonians are considered Sami. This is another forgery.
 
It doesn't matter, it all relates to Austrasia. The Huns lived in Bavaria, there is an oriental type of appearance. ...

Again:
(1) Austria had been in fromer times the Eastern part of the master dukedom Bavaria. It was seprated into two independent dukedoms. This is in the South of Germany.
(2) Austrasia - in German "Austrien" - had been the North-Eastern part of the Franconian empire. This is in the North of Germany.

"Austria" and "Austrasia" are two totally different things which have nothing to do wuth each other!!! Your mistake is as idiotic as if someone would say Australia and Austria are the same country and Germans are aboriginees with a black skin and blue eyes.
 

Forum List

Back
Top