- Nov 10, 2019
- 52,749
- 33,527
- 2,490
- Moderator
- #21
If we have laws, we either have them or we don't. It may be a foreign concept to you, but it is up to people (including minors ) to not commit crimes that will send them to jail. It is not as if they had no concept of right vs wrong. It is, in fact their choice. Personally, I think parents of kids committing crimes, violent acts, destructive acts, etc should automatically face charges also, as parents are supposed to be responsible for their children until age of 18. It is permissiveness that encourages this behavior. Parents have a responsibility to teach their children how to live within the law and customary acceptable behavior in society. Your solution (and Bragg's) is to externalize the cost and hardships of the kid's actions and misdeed to the people (including the business owners, other adults and children) in the community. This idea only encourages the criminal acts, as they go unpunished, basically saying "OK, parents never taught them, so the community must accept the behavior, no matter the losses, placing the misdeeds of those kids above the law, and classifying as acceptable behavior.refer to post 17. This is not a joke. This is real. America should rethink how it deals minor with non violent crimes
Keeping People Out of Jail Keeps People Out of Jail
To reduce incarceration, some counties and cities have stopped automatically prosecuting minor nonviolent crimes — and crime overall has gone down. A wave of policy and policing reform has followed.
People like you are part of the problem, not part of the solution.