No one can demonstrate another means by which one could prove they are of legal age to buy alcohol (or a gun, or whatever) without an ID.
I, however, have asked Voter ID proponents to provide just one case of actual voter fraud which could only have been prevented or stopped by an ID. They have never been able to do so.
Thus the idiocy of the "you need an ID to buy beer" argument.
That doesn't make any sense. How would you prove it if a person with no ID voted illegally but would have voted legally with one? It's common sense that no ID enables much more opportunity for fraud just like no lD requirement for alcohol would lead to more underage drinking.
Please provide just one case of actual voter fraud which could only have been prevented or stopped by an ID.
It's common sense that no ID enables much more opportunity for fraud just like no lD requirement for alcohol would lead to more underage drinking.
And so you have ZERO evidence to support Voter ID.
Just like I said. No one has ever been able to provide an actual case of voter fraud which could only have been prevented or stopped by Voter ID.
Thus the idiocy of the "you need an ID to buy beer" apples and oranges fallacy. It can be demonstrated that there is no other way to verify age than an ID. But you have failed to demonstrate there is no other way to prevent the types of voter fraud which occur.
you are setting up a false analogy.
Nope. The bozos with the "you need an ID to buy beer" are setting up the false analogy! Apples and oranges.
IF there is no other way to prove a person's age without ID , then likewise there is no other way to prove their identity without identity.
The fact that you here stating that you trust people to take their word when they say they are who they say they are but you don't trust them to tell you how old they really are seems mighty fishy to me and speaks of partisan stupidity.
I have a feeling you have never registered to vote and then voted.
I explained in very simple terms why your fantasy voter fraud does not match reality in an earlier post.
That's why I keep asking for ACTUAL voter fraud cases in which Voter ID,
and only Voter ID, could have stopped or prevented the fraud.
You have a feeling I have what?
Your analogy is stupid. You trust people to tell you who they are but not to tell you how old they are.
That tells me EVERYTHING I know about your "honesty" and your "debating skills"
I explained the fallacy of the "you need ID to buy beer" comparison in post 341. I cannot help you if you are too retarded to get it.
A lot of bloviation to cover up the fact you have no evidence. Nothing. Not one case of voter fraud which could only have been prevented or stopped by Voter ID.
All you have are imaginary fantasies and a shitload of logical fallacies to cover up that simple fact.
You didn't explain shit. It cracks me up when people think using big words makes them look smart.
Explain this
How do you trust people to tell you who they are
but
not trust them to tell you how old they are?
or how about this one
how do you justify requiring ID to exercise one right, but not the other
Or how about this dumb shit, can you PROVE that anyone has not been able to exercise their right to vote because of voter ID?
You are clearly a dumb ****, but if you would like me to run you all over the flagpole on this topic I will surely oblige you.