Guess it shows:
1- Begging Big Business to locate in your city
2- Allowing your city to thrive under the jobs/money Big Business brings in
Is dangerous, because once Big Business finds a more profitable place to locate, they'll jump ship and say "**** you all" to the city that originally welcomed them.
Then be a city that just makes it profitable for businesses in general.
Well, Detroit was that. New York and LA are that.
Right or wrong, the problem is that when major industry moves in, the population obviously grows, as does the housing market. And thus, more roads, schools, cops, firemen are needed.
And like business, when there is a need, you have to pay for what you get. So, cities want to be competitive in their labor market, so they offer employees enough to attract them away from OTHER government agencies.
You cant have major growth in business, housing, etc, and not provide better/more roads, schools, police. That ends up looking like Mexico City.
But then, the big industry fleas, and leaves the host city stuck with the situation that it built up in part to help support those businesses.
Its a nasty cycle. But, the business can literally move. The city cant. So when the environment is great for profits, big business moves in. But when the city responds to build itself up to support what that business boom creates.......the business can either stay, or, flee to a more profitable area. Some are loyal and stay. Others flee.