WaitingFor2020
Gold Member
- Banned
- #21
This is what's wrong with liberal brains.
Thanks for sharing your MRI with us.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This is what's wrong with liberal brains.
Drump is the ogre that lives in the liberal peabrain. He steps on their toy trains and hides in their closets at night.You spelled "Drumpf" wrong.This is the type of article ConTrolls cut and paste and say it has to do with liberals and Democrats, it's written from a psychological perspective:
A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters’ brains
I think the article has a point in that Trump influences people by playing on their fears, but I completely disagree about point 4. I don't think his speeches are that interesting, and sometimes really bore me. I'm not talking about agreeing with the content, he just often rambles on for a very long time. Of course, the shocking things can keep someone's attention, but in my opinion he rambles on more than he says shocking things, plus the way he talks is more annoying than captivating.
Hillary is running on NOTHING but fear.
Your neuroscientist is a partisan hack.
Who's Drumpf, and what is he running for?
You have a much greater chance of dying in a car accident than in a terrorist attack. Why isn't Trump supporting a ban on cars?There are real issues with our poor immigration policy.
Terrorism is a real problem. Just ask the gays in Orlando. Or the Hague for that matter.
Drump is the ogre that lives in the liberal peabrain. He steps on their toy trains and hides in their closets at night.You spelled "Drumpf" wrong.This is the type of article ConTrolls cut and paste and say it has to do with liberals and Democrats, it's written from a psychological perspective:
A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters’ brains
I think the article has a point in that Trump influences people by playing on their fears, but I completely disagree about point 4. I don't think his speeches are that interesting, and sometimes really bore me. I'm not talking about agreeing with the content, he just often rambles on for a very long time. Of course, the shocking things can keep someone's attention, but in my opinion he rambles on more than he says shocking things, plus the way he talks is more annoying than captivating.
Hillary is running on NOTHING but fear.
Your neuroscientist is a partisan hack.
Who's Drumpf, and what is he running for?
Spoken like a true veggie.This is what's wrong with liberal brains.
Thanks for sharing your MRI with us.
Liar. You've never listened to one of his speeches. Thanks for proving what lefties are.This is the type of article ConTrolls cut and paste and say it has to do with liberals and Democrats, it's written from a psychological perspective:
A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters’ brains
I think the article has a point in that Trump influences people by playing on their fears, but I completely disagree about point 4. I don't think his speeches are that interesting, and sometimes really bore me. I'm not talking about agreeing with the content, he just often rambles on for a very long time. Of course, the shocking things can keep someone's attention, but in my opinion he rambles on more than he says shocking things, plus the way he talks is more annoying than captivating.
There's no content to his speeches. It's all about performance and presentation and shock value.
you give em too much credit.This is what's wrong with liberal brains.
This is the type of article ConTrolls cut and paste and say it has to do with liberals and Democrats, it's written from a psychological perspective:
A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters’ brains
I think the article has a point in that Trump influences people by playing on their fears, but I completely disagree about point 4. I don't think his speeches are that interesting, and sometimes really bore me. I'm not talking about agreeing with the content, he just often rambles on for a very long time. Of course, the shocking things can keep someone's attention, but in my opinion he rambles on more than he says shocking things, plus the way he talks is more annoying than captivating.
Liar. You've never listened to one of his speeches. Thanks for proving what lefties are.This is the type of article ConTrolls cut and paste and say it has to do with liberals and Democrats, it's written from a psychological perspective:
A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters’ brains
I think the article has a point in that Trump influences people by playing on their fears, but I completely disagree about point 4. I don't think his speeches are that interesting, and sometimes really bore me. I'm not talking about agreeing with the content, he just often rambles on for a very long time. Of course, the shocking things can keep someone's attention, but in my opinion he rambles on more than he says shocking things, plus the way he talks is more annoying than captivating.
There's no content to his speeches. It's all about performance and presentation and shock value.
Like I said, you're a liar. If you had listened to his rallies you would know he speaks on substance, the things that matter to ordinary Americans. That's why he has had massive crowds, from day one. What the media covers is not his rallies but what they think of them.Liar. You've never listened to one of his speeches. Thanks for proving what lefties are.This is the type of article ConTrolls cut and paste and say it has to do with liberals and Democrats, it's written from a psychological perspective:
A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters’ brains
I think the article has a point in that Trump influences people by playing on their fears, but I completely disagree about point 4. I don't think his speeches are that interesting, and sometimes really bore me. I'm not talking about agreeing with the content, he just often rambles on for a very long time. Of course, the shocking things can keep someone's attention, but in my opinion he rambles on more than he says shocking things, plus the way he talks is more annoying than captivating.
There's no content to his speeches. It's all about performance and presentation and shock value.
I've listened to most of them. He's been given more air time than anyone in the last 20 years.
No offense, and I realize you didn't vouch for it. Perhaps there really are people who like threats or whatever who support Trump. But, Trump is pointing out a TRUTH. Neither the dem or gop parties actually promote the benefit of families making 100-200K.
The problem, imo, of Trump's candidacy is that he's mixed that with anti-immigrant hysteria, irrationally overstate fear of terrorists, flat out racism against blacks, misogynist statements that were not so offensive back when he pretty much was libertarian in is views of choice and harassment. The article tries to make sense of all that. Imo it's a disservice to Trump voters. They accept all the dross for the central truth.
This is the type of article ConTrolls cut and paste and say it has to do with liberals and Democrats, it's written from a psychological perspective:
A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters’ brains
I think the article has a point in that Trump influences people by playing on their fears, but I completely disagree about point 4. I don't think his speeches are that interesting, and sometimes really bore me. I'm not talking about agreeing with the content, he just often rambles on for a very long time. Of course, the shocking things can keep someone's attention, but in my opinion he rambles on more than he says shocking things, plus the way he talks is more annoying than captivating.
There's no content to his speeches. It's all about performance and presentation and shock value.
You have a much greater chance of dying in a car accident than in a terrorist attack. Why isn't Trump supporting a ban on cars?There are real issues with our poor immigration policy.
Terrorism is a real problem. Just ask the gays in Orlando. Or the Hague for that matter.
You are much more likely to get shot by someone who is not a Muslim than you are to get killed by gun or bomb or other in a Muslim terrorist attack. Should you ban guns then?