Brick Gold
Gold Member
- Jan 30, 2022
- 1,234
- 362
- 208
The problem with industrial "art" is that it is equates the notion of what is visually pleasing as an automatic admission into what is considered art. And while a piece might possess all the qualities of a painting, and creative endeavor, it is truly in the end, nothing but an excersize in geometry and mathematics, better left on an architects desk than an artists portfolio. Its there though and will always be, reminding us of what happens with soulless machine has the reigns of power.Like anything else, people are looking to make a massive profit out of it. So they buy things from "known artists" hoping that their investment will pay off in the future.
So, a man that can paint shapes pleasing to the eye with a good grasp of spatial and color skills can basically sell a fast food paper sack for millions a day after he painted it. Is that art?
The great lesson of 20th century artists is that you can sell anything as art so long as it is visually pleasing, even a mud splatter.
Last edited: