Body Art

Having body art (tattoos) is obviously a personal choice. I wonder if placement isn't a turn off for men when they find it on a woman. For instance, who is this tattoo for? She won't even see it most of the time however anyone (probably a man) will see it when taking her from behind. Is that really something most men would like to see on a potential life partner?

View attachment 1216564
Not me but I’m sure there are
 
My father’s only tattoo was one he had of my mother that he got on their 40th wedding anniversary.
 
My daughter got her name tattooed as a tramp stamp when she was an adult, so I had no say. I told her that it made it easy if I was ever called to identify her body, I would have to say show me her ass so I can check the name!
 
"Do you have any scars or distinguishing marks on your body?" No.
 
I'm almost 80. I've never gotten a tattoo, and never will. A few small tattoos might be OK on people, but when they start doing the larger and all over the body, it's gross.

When I was a kid in the 40s & 50s, a lot of World War 2 vets had tattoos only on their arms, of army, navy, etc logos, or eagles, or American flags. Those I thought highly of. I still do.
I couldn't agree more on all counts. :salute:
 
Tattoos used to be a little intimidating. You knew you were dealing with someone who was potentially volatile. That was a couple of generations ago.
Now they are the epitome of sheep-think. About as stupid as driving an EV.
They mostly look like permanent bruises. Unattractive and revealing.
You must be the guy drooling over Skin & Ink magazine.
 
Back
Top Bottom