You just said exactly the OPPOSITE of what she said. Because the KKK is a political organization (you realize the KKK is not a race, religion, ethnicity, gender, etc. - right?) it is not protected under Public Accommodation laws that restrict owners from discriminating based on race, religion, ethnicity, gender, etc.
As such a black business owner is free to turn down a catering job because they are a political organization, he is not free to turn them down because they are white.
Wrong. By her reasoning, if the Black forest turns down the KKK gig by stating it's because they're a WHITE supremacists group, that's illegal. That's what she said. Nothing about politics, but race...which is a protected class.
Point is there should be NO class protected over any other class, IMO.
Now if the KKK were to file a complaint with the appropriate agency, that agency will do an investigation. They will look at the group and they will look at the business - if the business. The business will say "No I didn't turn them down because they were white, here is a list of all my catering jobs over the last 2 years. As you will notice I routinly cater to white customers so that claim is false." Based on that evidence alone (that the owner supplies THE SAME catering service to white customers) the investigation would be closed and the case dismissed.
Sorry, the KKK thing is just stupid. You think businesses have records?
Doesn't matter. The proof is in the pudding. That Christian baker that was forced to service the gay wedding had done MANY gay events. Had PLENTY of gay customers...as their records showed. But when the gay wedding emerged, which conflicted with their protected status of religion, the PC police ruled in favor of the gay community.
Oh what a slippery slope.
."
