Who says they are disingenuous? You and the media? That is not working and has little to do with honest debate. Your hate for Trump has warped your mind. You might need help.
How so? Are you a real Muslim? You won't say. You flee when asked.
Communists in the Soviet Union talked this way about anyone that did not support Marxism.
nationalinterest.org
No they didn't. The Soviet Union was a communist country. They were never known for free and fair election. There is just no getting around the fact, every body, including trump knows he lost and was told as much by trump insiders, the states, the courts, and even his own family members, even before he tried to get the electoral college overthrown on Jan. 6.Communists in the Soviet Union talked this way about anyone that did not support Marxism.
Anyone that did not support the party line, was persona non grata in the STATE, and thus, did not have a right to any economic, social or political existence in society.
I am already hearing stories of whistle blowers exposing corruption in the FBI. If the same could be true of places like the CIA, NSA, etc.? It would be naive to believe that everything that is put out by the government and MSM corporate press is necessarily true, and thus, such an attitude about, what is, "legitimate debate," sounds, very, VERY, eerily authoritarian to me.
Why would any real American want to support such an oppressive attitude toward society? DO you even know the difference between an open society and a closed society?
I assure you, it has nothing to do with George Soros' "open society foundation."
". . . In fact, he said, the view that some collective social entity—be it, for example, a city, a state, society, a nation, or a race—has needs that are prior and superior to the needs of actual living persons is a central ethical tenet of all totalitarian systems, whether ancient or modern. Nazis, for instance, emphasized the needs of the Aryan race to justify their brutal policies, whereas communists in the Soviet Union spoke of class aims and interests as the motor of history to which the individual must bend. The needs of the race or class superseded the needs of individuals. In contrast, Popper held, members of an open society see the state and other social institutions as human designed, subject to rational scrutiny, and always serving the interests of individuals—and never the other way around. True justice entails equal treatment of individuals rather than Plato’s organistic view, in which justice is identified as a well functioning state.. . . "
If you would deny a platform to your fellow Americans, simply because of their beliefs, then it would seem to me, your allegiance is more to the STATE, than to the interests of those individuals that need representation. THUS? You are like the Nazis, Communists, or, further back, the Spartans, a proponent of closed societies, believing that the individuals must be subservient to the needs of the STATE.
Popper's Return Engagement
The notion of a contrast between open and closed societies, which was introduced by Henri Bergson and made popular by Karl Popper, is now familiar even to people who have read neither the former’s The Two Sources of Morality and Religion (1932) nor the latter’s The Open Society and its Enemies...
And of course you are simply lying to the USMB forum again, as usual.
LOL.....It didn't take me but a couple of days after I joined to get shed of him/her.....I'm not much at suffering fools.
You are the big assed liar. Embarrassing, isn't it? I'll ask again, so answer my question... Are you a Muslim?And of course you are simply lying to the USMB forum again, as usual.
I challenge you to cite any one of my 28,000 posts where I refused to answer that question. You will flee away from that challenge because you are a pathetic cowardly liar.
Anytime anyone here directly asks me or otherwise brings up the subject here at USMB, I always straight up tell them that I'm not Muslim, I'm an atheist. And I have never claimed to be or in any way insinuated that I'm a Muslim, you disgusting lying piece of shit.
Why? Because unlike you, I don't lie when I post here at USMB. I have no reason to.
Unlike you and many other LWNJ moonbats here, I don't need to lie to myself or the USMB forum to back up any of my political opinions.
^
I'm soooo sorry. Get a life and be a man. If you can.
Based on what I'm seeing here in Arizona, the strategy is for Team China to buy up all of the TV commercial time and flood Arizonans with attack ads on Blake Masters and Kari Lake. Why risk a debate? Same thing going on with Uncle Fester and Dr. Oz in Pa. Uncle Fester is going to hide in the Addams' Family basement until election day.Why do you think that is? AZ. is leading the way in exposing the Democratic propaganda and lies.
Democrats Mark Kelly and Katie Hobbs running for statewide office in Arizona, are refusing to participate in the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections debate against their Trump-Endorsed Republican competitors.
Arizona Democrats REFUSE To Debate Trump-Endorsed Candidates: Senator Mark Kelly Has Not Responded To Debate Challenge from Blake Masters - Response Due FRIDAY | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson
Democrats Mark Kelly and Katie Hobbs running for statewide office in Arizona, are refusing to participate in the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections debate against their Trump-Endorsed Republican competitors.www.thegatewaypundit.com
No. And I've never claimed to be a Muslim. In fact, my screen name and avatar openly makes fun of extremist Muslims. It's right there for you to see, dumbass.
Who the hell is "we" and what does that have to do with the OP?Keep telling yourself that, maybe you will bleev it, one day. . . .
You want me to beg like you? Screw you.No. What part of the sentence "I'm an atheist" does your feeble mind fail to comprehend, you ******* unfathomably low IQ stupid kunt?
I think you missed the whole intent of my post.
Anyone that you name call and refuse to constructively engage? They are the champions.
Not "we" anymore. Got it.
